Guest shiloh357 Posted January 18, 2018 Share Posted January 18, 2018 1 hour ago, OldSchool2 said: If being overweight, not exercising, not sleeping well while eating fast food doesn't make one a candidate for an MI, then nothing does. Yeah, and if you go buy that logic then 99% of America is mentally ill. I am sorry, but that comment is just patently absurd. You really don't have a case for claiming that the president is unfit for office. You are fighting a losing battle because the facts are simply not on your side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmbld Posted January 18, 2018 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 48 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 2,491 Content Per Day: 0.55 Reputation: 1,457 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/23/2011 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/02/1971 Share Posted January 18, 2018 3 hours ago, OldSchool2 said: If being overweight, not exercising, not sleeping well while eating fast food doesn't make one a candidate for an MI, then nothing does. Sounds like an average American. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted January 19, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 19, 2018 19 hours ago, Steve_S said: You left out the underlined part, which includes mental status examination. It should specifically include... mental status examination, family history, personal history.... What part of "Minor modifications in the assessment format may be required depending on the kind of request" didn't you understand? And "should specifically include" is not "must specifically include." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted January 19, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 19, 2018 19 hours ago, shiloh357 said: .... You really don't have a case for claiming that the president is unfit for office. You are fighting a losing battle because the facts are simply not on your side. The claim for Prez Trump's unfitness for office is by Dr. Lee and 27 other mental health specialists, not me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted January 19, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 19, 2018 22 hours ago, Davida said: This picture is not a gotcha moment-it is old news.... ... but not "fake news," and 2005 is not that long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 3 hours ago, OldSchool2 said: The claim for Prez Trump's unfitness for office is by Dr. Lee and 27 other mental health specialists, not me. It is a claim that you agree with and are promoting, so at some level, it is coming from you, as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_S Posted January 19, 2018 Group: Servant Followers: 25 Topic Count: 275 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 5,208 Content Per Day: 1.00 Reputation: 1,893 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/02/2010 Status: Offline Share Posted January 19, 2018 3 hours ago, OldSchool2 said: What part of "Minor modifications in the assessment format may be required depending on the kind of request" didn't you understand? And "should specifically include" is not "must specifically include." Making a diagnosis based on having a small part of one simple criteria available is not reasonable. That's why their professional association forbids it. You cannot even make a full personality assessment based on public comments alone, because you are only seeing part of a person. This is the medical equivalent of an oncologist diagnosing cancer and starting chemotherapy after having a phone conversation with a person describing a few symptoms. It is absolutely absurd and 100 percent political. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted January 20, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 20, 2018 14 hours ago, Butero said: I personally find that Dr. Lee and anyone else that tries to diagnose mental illness based on nothing more than what we see on the nightly news and a person's tweets is unfit to practice psychiatry.... Yet Lee and her forensic colleagues still have their licenses to practice despite personal opinions to the contrary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted January 20, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 20, 2018 15 hours ago, Butero said: A lot of things have changed since 2005. After the messy election, that is an eternity. There is no chance Trump is friends with the Clintons anymore. Trump answered questions about his alliances during the campaign, about how he basically sucked up to politicians to get things done. He was coming from the point of view of a business man. We knew this when we entered the voting booth... ... so does John 9:41 apply? And just because Donald is no longer friends with Hill and Bill doesn't mean that they are not still "birds of a feather." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted January 20, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 20, 2018 18 hours ago, Steve_S said: Making a diagnosis based on having a small part of one simple criteria available is not reasonable. That's why their professional association forbids it. You cannot even make a full personality assessment based on public comments alone, because you are only seeing part of a person... After decades of his past printed in the NY papers, Donald Trump was hardly invisible to anyone with eyes to see. And was it reasonable for the highest legislative body in the land to host what you are calling an unprofessional act by Dr. Lee, who along with her Yale colleagues still have their respective licenses to practice forensic medicine? Why hasn't the American Psychiatric Association and the Connecticut state licensing board decisively intervened after Dr. Lee presented her published case before Congress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts