Still Alive Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,024 Content Per Day: 1.34 Reputation: 1,224 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/05/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: I have neer heard a KJV only advocate say that. Gipp said it in a video debate in the mid-90's. Yeah, It shocked me too. You can google it but here is an example: http://www.ruckmanism.org/danger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neighbor Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 18 Topic Count: 950 Topics Per Day: 0.35 Content Count: 13,526 Content Per Day: 5.02 Reputation: 9,027 Days Won: 6 Joined: 12/04/2016 Status: Online Birthday: 03/03/1885 Share Posted March 27, 2018 16 minutes ago, Davida said: Thank you Neighbor for giving a great example of a poorly disguised insult. Very tiresome. Aw I probably should have let it pass, but I just found it hit me as funny this AM. I read some of the stuff I write and also say to myself, oh my really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still Alive Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,024 Content Per Day: 1.34 Reputation: 1,224 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/05/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, Adstar said: Yes pride is a terrible thing.. It prevents one from admitting an error and apologizing and moving on... Thus they end the possibility of productive discussion.. So, you are debating the meaning of Ad-hominem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still Alive Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,024 Content Per Day: 1.34 Reputation: 1,224 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/05/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 27, 2018 12 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: I have neer heard a KJV only advocate say that. The KJV only position is that the KJV is the Word of God to English speaking people. They have not, to my knowledge argued that everyone in the world must learn English in order to get the only Word of God. The KJV only position isn't that shallow. Their position is that any translation in any language that is based on the same manuscript stream that the KJV comes from (Antiochan) is the Word of God that particular language. Yeah, I never had either. Then I started reading articles and watching videos. If you'll google it you will discover there is a lot of discussion out there on this very subject. I had no idea. I do now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adstar Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 75 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,399 Content Per Day: 0.43 Reputation: 1,307 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/01/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted March 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Still Alive said: So, you are debating the meaning of Ad-hominem? So you are digging your heels in and doubling down? Your choice.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still Alive Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,024 Content Per Day: 1.34 Reputation: 1,224 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/05/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 27, 2018 9 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: To a be a little more accurate, all I said was that the title is misleading if this is actually a debate about Sam Gipp's version of the KJV debate and the title needs to reflect that. It helps people decide if they want to engage in a thread if the title correctly reflects the substance of the thread. That's why I changed the title. You were right. Though I saw it as a good series on KJVO, it really was a discussion of the merits and weaknesses of Gipp's series, and should have been titled accordingly, which is why I took your advise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still Alive Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,024 Content Per Day: 1.34 Reputation: 1,224 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/05/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Adstar said: So you are digging your heels in and doubling down? Your choice.. It's kinda funny. I was listening to Jordan Peterson debate a transgender about gender pronouns and was thinking, Man, I know how he feels. Yes, I'm doubling down. I know the definition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adstar Posted March 27, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 75 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,399 Content Per Day: 0.43 Reputation: 1,307 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/01/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted March 27, 2018 Just now, Still Alive said: It's kinda funny. I was listening to Jordan Peterson debate a transgender about gender pronouns and was thinking, Man, I know how he feels. Yes, I'm doubling down. I know the definition. Yep pride to the max... Such a superior attitude you have.. I will let you have the final reply.. We all know how proud people must get the final reply in so they can feel they have ""Won"".. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Still Alive said: Yeah, I never had either. Then I started reading articles and watching videos. If you'll google it you will discover there is a lot of discussion out there on this very subject. I had no idea. I do now. Yes, but who were you listening to on those videos? Anyone can put out a video these days or post an article. That says nothing about their credibility on the topic. When someone is making over-the-top claims like saying that everyone has to learn English if they want to read the true Bible is probably not someone who has any real knowledge on the topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Still Alive said: Gipp said it in a video debate in the mid-90's. Yeah, It shocked me too. You can google it but here is an example: http://www.ruckmanism.org/danger Peter Ruckman was a quack and more or less, had a cult following. I am not sure Sam Gipp ever said that the KJV is the only true Bible in the world. I would have to have him on video record actually saying that before I would believe it. Edited to add: We also don't know if Gipp said, "yes" in jest and the rest of his answer is omitted. I know of a preacher that was being interviewed years ago for a local newspaper in my town and he made joke about something he was asked about, but the reporter either purposely or inadvertently related the pastor's words without the context of it being an attempt a humor. He caught a lot of grief over that. Edited March 27, 2018 by shiloh357 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts