Jump to content
IGNORED

Creation using Evolution


pgardner2358

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  41,062
  • Content Per Day:  7.97
  • Reputation:   21,390
  • Days Won:  76
  • Joined:  03/13/2010
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/27/1957

11 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

Todd Wood has learned enough of the science to admit that "gobs and gobs" of evidence support evolution. He chooses to not accept the evidence at face value since it contradicts his interpretation of the Bible. I can respect that approach. But it is simply unproductive to argue anything to the effect of "science disproves evolution". That's all I'm saying at this point. I'm not really feeling the need to argue Biblical interpretation ?

Evolution is a game of fools... that's all I have to say about that :) 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.11
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, enoob57 said:

Evolution is a game of fools... that's all I have to say about that :) 

You are certainly entitled to your opinion. If you are interested in a real discussion, I can help you formulate a more educated opinion and therefore, a better argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  223
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/15/2018
  • Status:  Offline

Isn't there a new theory that says there was no big bang .. Always learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  41,062
  • Content Per Day:  7.97
  • Reputation:   21,390
  • Days Won:  76
  • Joined:  03/13/2010
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/27/1957

Just now, one.opinion said:

You are certainly entitled to your opinion. If you are interested in a real discussion, I can help you formulate a more educated opinion and therefore, a better argument.

I spoke directly to specifics: 
causality
entropy
mathematical probabilities
The Word of God
These categories alone support my assessment of creationism!
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.11
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

1 minute ago, enoob57 said:

I spoke directly to specifics: 
causality
entropy
mathematical probabilities
The Word of God
These categories alone support my assessment of creationism!

I don't feel much like playing games or participating in a verbal fight. Do you want to have a discussion in which I can help you let go of poor arguments, or would you rather not?

  • Loved it! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.11
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

6 minutes ago, brujaq said:

Isn't there a new theory that says there was no big bang .. Always learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth

I'm not much of a cosmologist, but I'm sure there are some hypotheses (but not theories) about the origin of the universe that differ from the big bang. I can carry out a much better conversation with biological evolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  41,062
  • Content Per Day:  7.97
  • Reputation:   21,390
  • Days Won:  76
  • Joined:  03/13/2010
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/27/1957

3 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

I don't feel much like playing games or participating in a verbal fight. Do you want to have a discussion in which I can help you let go of poor arguments, or would you rather not?

You are very humorous... and no I am settled in the study I've done! It is advanced enough to see it as God sees it :thumbsup:

Rom 1:20-32

20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
KJV
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.11
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

12 minutes ago, enoob57 said:

no I am settled in the study I've done!

Alright, God's grace and peace to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  35
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,788
  • Content Per Day:  1.19
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2015
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, one.opinion said:

 I can respect that approach.  ?

Can you?

:) siegi :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  35
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,788
  • Content Per Day:  1.19
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2015
  • Status:  Offline

46 minutes ago, enoob57 said:

I spoke directly to specifics: 
causality
entropy
mathematical probabilities
The Word of God
These categories alone support my assessment of creationism!
 

That is intriguing. I need to know more.

Let's neglect for a second the Word of God, which obviously supports creationism tautologically. Actually, it is not clear why you mentioned the others when you assume this, since it is a sufficient condition for creationism. Is it not?

But what about the others? For instance, how does entropy support creationism?

:) siegi :)

 

Edited by siegi91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...