Jump to content
Heb 13:8

The context of 1 Thess 5:1

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

RM, Rachel and Joseph are dead. This has nothing to do with people that existed 2000 years ago. By doing this you are placing a 2000 year gap in between Rev 12:5 and Rev 12:6. That's false. If I remember correctly you are pre-trib, and Rev 12:5 harpazo confirms that belief so why you are fighting this is bizarre.

Its a CODE MAN not a Gap, just like the Rev. 17 Kings via 5 HAVE FALLEN and ONE IS and one is YET TO COME is not a 2000-2500 year Gap to the Prophecy because John couldn't PROPHECY about the past 5 KINGS or the King THAT WAS.........Those were JUST FACTS, not Prophetic uttering's. Likewise the CODE about the Woman (Israel) the male child Jesus and the Red Dragon (Satan) who tried to KILL Jesus also WAS NOT A Prophetic uttering, not could it be, it was PAST EVENTS, just like the Genesis 37:9 Code was also PAST EVENTS............the Prophetic uttering, just like I stated before, starts in Rev. 12:6 and runs through Rev. 12:17. Its about Israel Fleeing Judea and God protecting her for 1260 days. They had to encode it, John couldn't wrote down that Israel were going to be PROTECTED by God, the Romans had just subdued Israel/Jerusalem, that would have been see as SEDITION, so they wrote it in CODED LANGUAGE !! Why can't people understand the obvious here? ITS ENCODED for a reason.

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

A 2000 year gap is not biblical RM.

Quote

Its not a Gap, its a CODE !! The Prophecy starts in verse 6. 

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

4 times, wow. i'm surprised you didn't make it 5 or 6 times, lol. Rev 12:1-5 has only come to pass once on 9/23/17. Everything lining up plus Jupiter in the womb for 42 weeks has only occurred once.

Quote

That was just in the 1000 years that the Astronomer CHECKED to disprove the bunk, its got to be more. Its just Astrology. 

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

I guess poo pooing on astronomy is the thing now. Blessed is the one who hears it and takes it to heart, Rev 1:3

Quote

Its Astrology, astronomy would not call Planets STARS to start with. 

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

That's right, so he uses the sun, moon and stars which everyone can see instead of people who are dead and buried? 🙄

Quote

Read Genesis 37:9, God uses all kind of things when he gives DREAMS.......See the Statue of Daniel.

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

Rev 4-5 are describing the scene in heaven at rapture. The entire chapter of Rev 12 is describing the 70th week. You sound silly putting a 2000 year gap in between verses. Where is your faith RM?

Quote

Maybe verse 1 in chapter 4, but in Rev. ch. 5 they already have their White Raiment (Robes) on, thus they have already married the Lamb. Rev. 19 is a Parenthetical Citation, not a real time chapter/EVENT. Rev. 16 says IT IS DONE !!

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

And I suppose you would the deny the blood moon tetrad falling on Jewish Holidays in 2014-15? It's all part of the secret code man, the aliens are here. To much HBO for you.

You just dodged the lesson hey? That's OK, just remember where you learned that tid-bit at brother. I understand the possible blood moons and TETRADS, but I am afraid most people don't understand the SIGN until many years latter, if its a sign at all, like the 1492 sign would have been Spain casting out the Jews, no one would have understood it to be a sign at the time right ?  But it has nothing to do with the Rapture.

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

Oh I see, so if God uses the stars to guide us closer to the rapture and the 70th week that's astrology? Really? 

Quote

God never uses Astrology, he ENCODED Rev. 12 with Genesis 37:9.

2 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

Are you born again RM, are you covered under the blood of Christ? God bless.

I have been a preacher over 30 years...........Are you born again ? Kinda a silly question right?  Its what people do when they can't debate a point it seems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Revelation Man said:

Likewise the CODE about the Woman (Israel) the male child Jesus and the Red Dragon (Satan) who tried to KILL Jesus also WAS NOT A Prophetic uttering

RM, the word "teknon" is a reference to the church, not Jesus Christ.

Quote
Its Astrology, astronomy would not call Planets STARS to start with. 

Who is calling planets stars? 

Quote
I have been a preacher over 30 years...........Are you born again ? Kinda a silly question right?  Its what people do when they can't debate a point it seems.

Preaching for 90 years has nothing to do with understanding context. 🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Heb 13:8 said:

Hello iam. I have a different interpretation if you will. Since John used the words "huios" and "teknon" to describe the child, the child therefore can only be the body of Christ being born through rapture, via John is connecting the head with the body Col 1:18. The word "teknon" is never used to describe Jesus Christ alone, it's always used in the context of either the body of Christ or a believer himself.

Rev 12:1-5 is not using singular entities, rather it's describing corporate entities in the end times. Rev 12:6-17 is an entire description of the 70th week of Daniel.

1. Israel - The Woman
2. The Body of Christ - The Child
3. The Anti-Christ System - The Dragon (Rev 13)

God Bless.

teknon:  Strongs:  offspring, children

  1. child

    1. a male child, a son

Mat 2:18  In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her childrenG5043 and would not be comforted, because they are not.

Mat 7:11  If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your childrenG5043 how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?

It should be very obvious it is speaking of a normal child birthed from a normal woman.  To come up with the church here one must add imagination. KJV translated it as a child 77 times.  How then could anyone imagine this word is not used typically as a child?  

huios Strongs:

Translated as Son 85 times 

Translated as child or children 49 times. 

a son

  1. rarely used for the young of animals

  2. generally used of the offspring of men

  3. in a restricted sense, the male offspring (one born by a father and of a mother)

Again it should be very obvious it is speaking of a normal child birthed from a normal woman. But with the previous Greek word, it specifies a Male child.  How then could anyone imagine that is in reference to the church? In any translation a normal reading by a 5th grader would tell us it is speaking of a typical male child. 

Pulpit commentary:  And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron; a son, a male - the Greek υἱόν, ἄρσεν, renders it emphatic - who is to rule, as in the Revised Version; to rule, or to govern as a shepherd (cf. the verb in Matthew 2:6). This reference and Psalm 2:9 leave no doubt as to the identification of the man child. It is Christ who is intended. The same expression is used of him in Revelation 19, where he is definitely called the "Word of God." And her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. The sentence seems plainly to refer to the ascension of Christ and his subsequent abiding in heaven, from whence he rules all nations.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary:  rod of iron—A rod is for long-continued obstinacy until they submit themselves to obedience [Bengel]: Re 2:27; Ps 2:9, which passages prove the Lord Jesus to be meant. Any interpretation which ignores this must be wrong.

As I said, if someone imagines a secondary meaning, such as the church ruling the world with a rod of iron, I would not argue much. I would only say that the child Jesus is the primary meaning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Heb 13:8 said:

RM, the word "teknon" is a reference to the church, not Jesus Christ.

Who is calling planets stars? 

Preaching for 90 years has nothing to do with understanding context. 🙄

Amen to that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, iamlamad said:

teknon:  Strongs:  offspring, children

  1. child

    1. a male child, a son

How then could anyone imagine that is in reference to the church?

Because the entire context of Rev 12 is in reference to prophecy and the 70th week of Daniel, not Martha sitting on her back porch with her child drinking tea. The word "harpazo" in 1 Thess 4:17, Rev 12:5 is in reference to end times application. God bless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×