Jump to content
shiloh357

Media Should Fear Muslims and Leftists, Not Trump

Recommended Posts

Trump's criticism of the media “is contributing to a rise in threats against journalists and will lead to violence,” claims Artie Sulzberger, the latest scion of the New York Times dynasty. 

Artie, who got the chairman job because of his last name, earns $5 million a year. The only threat to him came from a shameless bootlicking Washington Post article praising his journalistic humility.

“Yeah, we get it, you don’t like us. Fine. But do you have to put our lives in danger?" MSNBC's Katy Tur whined. “He wants to endanger the lives of journalists,” columnist Connie Smith wailed at Trump.

How endangered is the modern media hack?

Reporters, pundits and other fake news media gobbers have been claiming that Trump is endangering them for a while now. 

"How long before someone is seriously hurt, or worse?" New York Times media columnist Jim Rutenberg demanded last August.

How long? It’s been over a year now. 

"Someone is going to do something awful to a journalist," Jeffrey Toobin claimed on CNN. And they have. They’ve mocked, ridiculed and humiliated the media for its hysterical fake news nonsense. 

The number of reporters shot by Trump supporters because of his attacks on the media currently stands at zero. And counting down. So the media has shifted gears of predicting that Trump’s criticism will cause reporters to die overseas. Sulzberger warned about the threat to the media overseas. "Trump slams CNN in potentially dangerous way," claims CNN. But agreed that the real threat is overseas.

Reporters are dying overseas. At the hands of Muslim terrorists.

The vast majority of massacres of reporters in recent years were carried out by Muslim terrorists. Of Reporters Without Borders’ own list of the deadliest attacks on the media in the last 10 years, including the most recent suicide bombing which killed 9 reporters in Afghanistan and the obscure Maguindanao massacre, dubbed the "single deadliest event for the press" since the Committee to Protect Journalists started keeping records, were carried out by Muslims.

The only non-Muslim attack on the list was carried out by a faction of the leftist FARC narcoterrorist group whose leadership was able to meet with John Kerry despite having a reward placed on their heads by the United States. As the media likes to mockingly sneer, “thanks Obama”.

In America, the single greatest death toll for media personnel in the last generation occurred on 9/11.

Maybe the media ought to reconsider its mindless ideological opposition to a terror state travel ban? 

The statistical evidence very clearly shows that media personnel are far more likely to be murdered by attackers shouting, “Allahu Akbar” than “Make America Great Again.” They’re also more likely to be hit by lightning than killed by a Trump supporter angry over the latest fake news smear of the president.

The media’s hysteria about the Trump threat is as baseless and groundless as the rest of its fake news.

There’s been no outbreak of violence against reporters in this country. Instead reporters have come more under physical threat from Black Lives Matter, Antifa and other leftists. 

Leftist doxer Taylor Lorenz, formerly of the Daily Beast and currently of The Atlantic, who doxed the daughters of a female counterjihad activist, exposing them to potential harm, was punched in the face in Charlottesville. But the puncher was a fellow leftist counterprotester inflicting collateral damage. He got off with a slap on the wrist, a suspended sentence, anger management and community service.

While the media blew up every incident where a reporter in Ferguson inhaled tear gas, actual physical attacks on reporters by Black Lives Matter racist thugs were mostly swept under the media’s dirty rug. 

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch's Paul Hampel was beaten bloody by Ferguson thugs. 

CNN devoted a fraction of the time to its own correspondent, Sara Sidner, being hit by rocks than it has to all the imaginary dangers of violence from Trump supporters.

A Milwaukee Journal Sentinel intern described a mob scene in which reporters were threatened and assaulted. 

“When they threw me to the ground, I reflexively curled up into a ball. Blows landed on my back, head and torso. 'Stop! He’s not white! He’s Asian!' I wasn’t sure who said it, or how they knew my race, but within seconds, the punches stopped." 

Then he blamed Asians for being insufficiently supportive of the racist black nationalist movement.

Despite all the media’s hysteria, the violent attacks on their ranks in this country aren’t coming from Trump supporters at rallies, but from their fellow leftists who are actually driving the violence.

And the media has covered up the scale of those attacks, especially after Ferguson, while refusing to address the ideological motives of the attackers. It’s made little to no effort to bring those attackers to justice or to challenge the culture of radical impunity that has led to physical attacks on the media.

If Trump supporters had assaulted a white reporter, beat him, and then let him go because he was white, we would never have heard the end of the story. There would already have been a bestselling book, a movie, a memorial and an annual award inspired by those events. And if Republicans were regularly beating reporters to a pulp, we would be hearing about it too. Non-stop. On every channel.

Instead the media wails about the hypothetical threat of one day being attacked by a Trump supporter.

Maybe overseas. 

The groups most likely to kill reporters overseas are Latin American drug cartels and Muslim terrorists. These are the two groups that benefit the most from the media’s leftist advocacy against border security and immigration security reform. 

Domestically, the media’s greatest violent threat comes from leftist activists. Overseas, its greatest threats come from the two types of migrants whom Trump wants to keep out and it wants to let in.

Trump isn’t threatening the media. He’s protecting it from the consequences of its own ideology. 

If the average media type had enough brains to fill a flash drive and enough common sense to stock a highlight reel, he would be thanking Trump for keeping the media safe from its own stupidity.

Instead the media can’t wait to get blown up, shot, beheaded and beaten by its own political allies. And once it’s through covering up the latest attack on it by Muslim terrorists, black nationalists, Marxist narcoterrorists or lefty thugs, it spreads dire warnings about the consequences of Trump’s rhetoric. 

The media’s shameless lying hacks can’t stop the fake news long enough to save their own lives.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/270948/media-should-fear-muslims-and-leftists-not-trump-daniel-greenfield

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the mainstream outlives its usefulness to the Islamic community, they will turn on the media like a pack of rabid wolves.  Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are not Islamic ideals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, other one said:

37893642_10216701984731929_2924392645721587712_n.jpg

Yep, that is the truth.   Churchill had a way with words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, other one said:

37893642_10216701984731929_2924392645721587712_n.jpg

5 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

Yep, that is the truth.   Churchill had a way with words.

1702092870_abequote.jpg.19c2b2884a87bb2ea00f293732e91f2b.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether Churchill said it or not, the sentiment is true.   Muslims are "peaceful" as long as their minority. Once they feel they are in a position of strength of numbers, they start imposing their vile ideology on their host country.   Of course, liberals are more than willing to help that along.   It wasn't until we got a Muslim sympathizer in the White House for eight years, that people were afraid to offend Muslims by saying, "Merry Christmas"  in stores.   No other ideology ever made it necessary for law enforcement to go through "sensitivity training."   This country would be far better off without the Muslims trying to insert their ideology into our way of life.   Either assimilate into the American way of life or get out of our country.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Churchill   on Islam from The Story of the Malakand Field Force:

That religion, which above all others was founded and propagated by the sword—the tenets and principles of which are instinct with incentives to slaughter and which in three continents has produced fighting breeds of men—stimulates a wild and merciless fanaticism. The love of plunder, always a characteristic of hill tribes, is fostered by the spectacle of opulence and luxury which, to their eyes, the cities and plains of the south display. A code of honour not less punctilious than that of old Spain is supported by vendettas as implacable as those of Corsica. …

Indeed it is evident that Christianity, however degraded and distorted by cruelty and intolerance, must always exert a modifying influence on men’s passions, and protect them from the more violent forms of fanatical fever, as we are protected from smallpox by vaccinations. But the Mohammaden religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since its votaries have been subject, above all the peoples of all other creeds, to this form of madness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Badjao33 said:

1702092870_abequote.jpg.19c2b2884a87bb2ea00f293732e91f2b.jpg

 

Lincoln did say this but about the newspaper industry.....    and the mime I posted is a columniation of several things Churchill wrote in three or four books books.

Edited by other one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

It wasn't until we got a Muslim sympathizer in the White House for eight years, people were afraid to offend Muslims by saying, "Merry Christmas"  in stores.  

Muslims offended by saying Merry Christmas? I've never met one. What source do you have for this? Muslims don't have a problem with Christmas. 

2004695770_muslimchristmas.jpg.4dbd3cd9e3256825e38f69dedb1f09c7.jpg

6 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

 No other ideology ever made it necessary for law enforcement to go through "sensitivity training."

Sensitivity training for minority groups is common in law enforcement and it is often requested by minority groups in communities. Here are some examples of sensitivity training for the Jewish community.

NYPD Special Victims Unit To Receive Sensitivity Training

As YWN had reported, a young girl was abducted on a Boro Park street two weeks ago. Following NYPD protocol, detectives from the NYPD Special Victims Unit were brought into the 66th Precinct  to interview the victim and conduct their investigation.

Following the investigation (which is still ongoing), many community Askanim, along with Brooklyn South Chief Fox felt that the same way that local precinct officers know all about Shabbos, Yomim Tovim and other Jewish laws and customs – the Special Victims Unit should be given sensitivity training as well.

Following the wishes of the concerned community leaders, Misaskim arranged a meeting at their state-of-the-art headquarters which was well attended by NYPD personnel including: Commanding Officer of the Special Victims Unit (Citywide) Tracy Shortell, Lieutenants of the same unit, Chief Banks (PBBS), Inspector Thursland (PBBS), 66th Precinct Commanding Officer Bill DeBlasio, Inspector the devoted men and woman of Brooklyn South’s Community Affairs Unit – including Lieutenant Jimmy Woods, Sergent Ira Jablonsky and members of the NYPD’s Commissioner Unit.

https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/general/22413/nypd-special-victims-unit-to-receive-sensitivity-training.html

2057411994_policejewish.jpg.902358a3edd71d7b893f8ede93ca6704.jpg

7 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

This country would be far better off without the Muslims trying to insert their ideology into our way of life.

Can you give an example of where Muslims have tried to "insert their ideology" into the American way of life? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Badjao33 said:

Muslims offended by saying Merry Christmas? I've never met one. What source do you have for this? Muslims don't have a problem with Christmas. 
 

Fortunately, for the rest of us, your the limited scope of your experience isn't what we go on.  Besides, if Muslims are offended by "Merry Christmas"  you would not admit it.   For the last several years before Trump was elected, the retail industry in most of the country instructed their employees to greet people with neutral holiday greetings.  Much of that was not to offend Muslims. 

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/muslims-successful-in-banning-christmas-in-maryland-schools-because-offensive/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340794/Christmas-evil-Muslim-group-launch-poster-campaign-festive-period.html

Quote

Sensitivity training for minority groups is common in law enforcement and it is often requested by minority groups in communities. Here are some examples of sensitivity training for the Jewish community.

Muslims are not a minority.   I am talking about sensitivity training for a particular ideology.   Law enforcement is required to show respect for all religions, but that is not the same thing as the special sensitivity training for Muslims.  In fact it was mandated by Obama who is likely a closet Muslim.  And even Home Depot got into the whole Muslim sensitivity training thing.  

Quote

Can you give an example of where Muslims have tried to "insert their ideology" into the American way of life? 

Linda Sarsour, who organized the DC women's march  wants to install Sharia law in the US and there is  Muslim support for that. 

According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”  When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).

More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.

These notions were powerfully rejected by the broader population according to the Center’s earlier national survey.  It found by a margin of 92%-2% that Muslims should be subject to the same courts as other citizens, rather than have their own courts and tribunals here in the U.S.

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

By contrast, the broader survey found that a 63% majority of those sampled said that “the freedom to engage in expression that offends Muslims or anybody else is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and cannot be restricted.”

Nearly one-fifth of Muslim respondents said that the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country.

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×