Claim: The UN Migration Pact IS legally binding and could be valid FOR ALL countries

[nebula]

If there is anyone here who is good at researching this sort of thing, this might be a good one to look into. Because if it is true, it's very, very bad.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

They lied: The UN Migration Pact IS legally binding and could be valid FOR ALL countries
 By LAURA CAT  15 December 2018

For months proponents of the UN Migration Pact  told us that the pact was non-binding. The response to the many citizens of nation states worldwide having signed country specific petitions was that it was non-binding so there was nothing to worry about, it was going to be good.

The immensely opposed and disastrous document declares unlimited migration to be treated as a human right, thereby deprecating the term ‘illegal migrants’, and criminalises any criticism of migration as hate speech.

<snip>

Now we know. In a frank exchange with Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Mr. Hebner of the AfD drew out an admission that it is, in fact, legally binding. As well, that it will be adopted as rule for all UN Member states once enacted.

Mr. Hebner asks: “You can see for yourself clearly that during the conference, the spokesperson for Morocco emphasised that the agreement was legally binding. He said clearly, in a literal sense, that there is a corresponding legal bond for all nations taking part as well as an obligation of implementation. You and your delegation did not raise a single word of objection to that statement but idly accepted it. I would like to emphasise that the parliamentary motion was not presented at the conference. “

Read full report here

Edited December 16, 2018 by nebula