Jump to content
IGNORED

Burnt At The Stake


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  151
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  3,146
  • Content Per Day:  1.06
  • Reputation:   2,063
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/12/2016
  • Status:  Offline

When Mary became Queen of England, she worked to bring England back to the Roman Catholic Church. One of her first acts was to arrest Bishop Ridley, Bishop Latimer, and Archbishop Thomas Cranmer

When Ridley was asked if he believed the pope was heir to the authority of Peter as the foundation of the Church, he replied that the church was not built on any man but on the truth Peter confessed -- that Christ was the Son of God. Ridley said he could not honor the pope in Rome since the papacy was seeking its own glory, not the glory of God.

"Christ made one oblation and sacrifice for the sins of the whole world, and that a perfect sacrifice; neither needeth there to be, nor can there be, any other propitiatory sacrifice." These opinions were deeply offensive to Roman Catholic theologians.

 

https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/bishops-ridley-and-latimer-burned-11629990.html

Edited by existential mabel
  • Brilliant! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  48
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  839
  • Content Per Day:  0.45
  • Reputation:   634
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/12/2019
  • Status:  Offline

I think a lot of Christians were perscuated around that time they didn't give up on their faith

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,204
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,792
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

7 hours ago, existential mabel said:

When Mary became Queen of England, she worked to bring England back to the Roman Catholic Church. One of her first acts was to arrest Bishop Ridley, Bishop Latimer, and Archbishop Thomas Cranmer

When Ridley was asked if he believed the pope was heir to the authority of Peter as the foundation of the Church, he replied that the church was not built on any man but on the truth Peter confessed -- that Christ was the Son of God. Ridley said he could not honor the pope in Rome since the papacy was seeking its own glory, not the glory of God.

"Christ made one oblation and sacrifice for the sins of the whole world, and that a perfect sacrifice; neither needeth there to be, nor can there be, any other propitiatory sacrifice." These opinions were deeply offensive to Roman Catholic theologians.

 

https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/bishops-ridley-and-latimer-burned-11629990.html

"These opinions were deeply offensive to Roman Catholic theologians."
And still are......

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  17
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,272
  • Content Per Day:  1.73
  • Reputation:   1,677
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/27/2019
  • Status:  Offline

What needs to be remembered is that many in the 16th century thought that the RC church needed reforming.

There problem was they couldn't agree on what to base any reformation.

Luther's protest was about abuse's of indulgence's, something most accepted as a fact.

That the RC church could not control it's self lead to the reformation and violent attempts to repress it.

That biblical based theology is offensive to RC is seen in the declaration's that came out of the council of Trent.

Things like 'he who declares salvation is by faith is anathema!'

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Catholic
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  67
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   17
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/06/2019
  • Status:  Offline

Hi

not sure if this'll post on forum yet...i'm a newby

dreadful what happened back then

but Bloody Mary not only one guilty of savagery

Henry VIII murdered many, many (Catholic) Christians

simply because they wouldn't acknowledge HIS self appointed/supposed 'right' to rule Church

or acclaim his divorce

then Elizabeth I took her 'turn' at judicial murder based on denomination

time to put ALL that behind us

seem to remember Our Lord Jesus suffered at the hands of judicial murderers

AND told us to love and forgive, love and forgive, love and forgive...

as for doctrinal issues...if we love Jesus, that's all that really matters

when we stand before Him He won't quiz us on our theology

He will look for the love in our hearts

love (and forgive) one another (no exceptions) as I have loved (and forgiven) you

love to one and all : )

Pax Christi

 

 

  

  • Loved it! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  17
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,272
  • Content Per Day:  1.73
  • Reputation:   1,677
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/27/2019
  • Status:  Offline

4 minutes ago, stuart allen said:

Hi

not sure if this'll post on forum yet...i'm a newby

dreadful what happened back then

but Bloody Mary not only one guilty of savagery

Henry VIII murdered many, many (Catholic) Christians

simply because they wouldn't acknowledge HIS self appointed/supposed 'right' to rule Church

or acclaim his divorce

then Elizabeth I took her 'turn' at judicial murder based on denomination

time to put ALL that behind us

seem to remember Our Lord Jesus suffered at the hands of judicial murderers

 

Pax Christi

 

 

 

Henry VIII is a poor example as he excuted those who rejected his adoption oif vthe position of head of the Church in England, while also exceuting those who taught the Lords prayer in English./

 

Then they rightly knew that what one believed was very important, literally amatter of life or death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  52
  • Topic Count:  1,010
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  12,205
  • Content Per Day:  1.79
  • Reputation:   16,281
  • Days Won:  92
  • Joined:  07/19/2005
  • Status:  Offline

On 4/17/2019 at 1:04 PM, existential mabel said:

When Mary became Queen of England, she worked to bring England back to the Roman Catholic Church. One of her first acts was to arrest Bishop Ridley, Bishop Latimer, and Archbishop Thomas Cranmer

When Ridley was asked if he believed the pope was heir to the authority of Peter as the foundation of the Church, he replied that the church was not built on any man but on the truth Peter confessed -- that Christ was the Son of God. Ridley said he could not honor the pope in Rome since the papacy was seeking its own glory, not the glory of God.

"Christ made one oblation and sacrifice for the sins of the whole world, and that a perfect sacrifice; neither needeth there to be, nor can there be, any other propitiatory sacrifice." These opinions were deeply offensive to Roman Catholic theologians.

 

https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/bishops-ridley-and-latimer-burned-11629990.html

Thank you for posting the article.   Hadn't heard of these wonderful, godly men before.   Such a story....

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  208
  • Content Per Day:  0.11
  • Reputation:   41
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/29/2019
  • Status:  Offline

On 4/17/2019 at 9:04 PM, existential mabel said:

When Mary became Queen of England, she worked to bring England back to the Roman Catholic Church. One of her first acts was to arrest Bishop Ridley, Bishop Latimer, and Archbishop Thomas Cranmer

When Ridley was asked if he believed the pope was heir to the authority of Peter as the foundation of the Church, he replied that the church was not built on any man but on the truth Peter confessed -- that Christ was the Son of God. Ridley said he could not honor the pope in Rome since the papacy was seeking its own glory, not the glory of God.

"Christ made one oblation and sacrifice for the sins of the whole world, and that a perfect sacrifice; neither needeth there to be, nor can there be, any other propitiatory sacrifice." These opinions were deeply offensive to Roman Catholic theologians.

 

https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/bishops-ridley-and-latimer-burned-11629990.html

Questions to consider for all members on these forums:

Is England and United Kingdom Catholic Controlled Dominions? Is Protestantism disguised Catholicism?

 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/be/Flag_of_England.svg/320px-Flag_of_England.svg.png

 

Flag of England

The flag of England is derived from Saint George's Cross (heraldic blazon: Argent, a cross gules). The association of the red cross as an emblem of England can be traced back to the Middle Ages, and it was used as a component in the design of the Union Flag in 1606.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_England

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  17
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,272
  • Content Per Day:  1.73
  • Reputation:   1,677
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/27/2019
  • Status:  Offline

22 hours ago, Elihoenai said:

Questions to consider for all members on these forums:

Is England and United Kingdom Catholic Controlled Dominions? Is Protestantism disguised Catholicism?

 

As you haven't defined what you think is rc or protestant what sort of answer do you expect?

I'm interested to read your responce to my first poost on this tread. The last couple of lines were:-

Biblical bassed theology is offencive to catholism as is seen by the council of trents declaration that saving faith is anathema.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  208
  • Content Per Day:  0.11
  • Reputation:   41
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/29/2019
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, Who me said:

As you haven't defined what you think is rc or protestant what sort of answer do you expect?

I'm interested to read your responce to my first poost on this tread. The last couple of lines were:-

Biblical bassed theology is offencive to catholism as is seen by the council of trents declaration that saving faith is anathema.

 

We haven't given a Universal definition of what constitutes Roman Catholic or Protestant, as individual readers may have their own definitions. With the quote above we can construct Universal Definitions.

If we assume that Roman Catholic opposes the True teachings of Scripture and Protestant is resisting for the True teachings of Scripture, than the Universals are the following:

Roman Catholic - anything that Opposes (Devil/Satan) the True teachings of Scripture

Protestant - anything resisting for the True teachings of Scripture 

If you don't know the True teachings of Scripture for yourself, how is it possible to know what is Protestant?

 

Jude 3-4 King James Version (KJV)

3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

 

 

Edited by Elihoenai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...