WN: 'Money bomb': Ron Paul raises $6 million in 24-hour

[WorthyNewsBot]

Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, raised an astounding $6 million and change Sunday, his campaign said, almost certainly guaranteeing he'll outraise his rivals for the Republican nomination in the fourth quarter and likely will be able to fund a presence in many of the states that vote Feb. 5.

http://www.worthynews.com/news/usatoday-co...draising_N-htm/

[faith pleases God]

Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, raised an astounding $6 million and change Sunday, his campaign said, almost certainly guaranteeing he'll outraise his rivals for the Republican nomination in the fourth quarter and likely will be able to fund a presence in many of the states that vote Feb. 5.

http://www.worthynews.com/news/usatoday-co...draising_N-htm/

People don't like to believe that the privatized media has its own bias (and endorsements). They don't accept that information is both magnified and suppressed by a bias. But drive around and look. Everywhere Ron Paul signs (more than anyone else). Polls (I'm not sure how accurate?) are saying one thing. But follow the grass roots $ trail and you'll see what's happening. The media promotes Huckabee, Giuliani, Mccain, Clinton, etc. and the sheeple follow. The media says Ron Paul has no chance. Swaying peoples minds and demonstrating their influence over the sheeple. America is a dumbed down, easily manipulated and deceived society that is easily influenced in masses (and doesn't think they are). The only hope people have is Jesus Christ.

Edited December 18, 2007 by faith pleases God

[Burning_Ember]

I have a feeling it will come down to Fred Thompson or Ron Paul. If Fred THompson, the Republicans will lose. If ROn Paul, him and Obama would be one of the most bizzare match-ups that could possibly come out of it.

[Matthitjah]

Grace to you,

Ron Paul will not be the Republican nominee. The only problem with his Candidacy is that it will lead to a third party run. This will bleed off enough votes to leave us with a Liberal Progressive leading the Nation, no matter who the presumptive Democrat nominee is.

This would be a real bad time in our Nations History to have a Liberal Progressive running things.

Real change for our Nation doesn't begin with Politics, it begins with the Church and her repentance and returning to God.

Peace,

Dave

[faith pleases God]

Grace to you,

Ron Paul will not be the Republican nominee. The only problem with his Candidacy is that it will lead to a third party run. This will bleed off enough votes to leave us with a Liberal Progressive leading the Nation, no matter who the presumptive Democrat nominee is.

This would be a real bad time in our Nations History to have a Liberal Progressive running things.

Real change for our Nation doesn't begin with Politics, it begins with the Church and her repentance and returning to God.

Peace,

Dave

I believe that Ron Paul is the only republican canidate who stands a chance against democrats.

[The Lorax]

I believe that Ron Paul is the only republican canidate who stands a chance against democrats.

I completely agree. Ron Paul might not be terribly popular among Republicans but, out of the GOP candidates, he and he alone has enough bipartisan appeal to win a general election.

Anyway, I can't stand the current frontrunners on either side. Rudy and Hillary both make me want to hurl. They are probably more corrupt than anyone else in the bunch.

[O'Dannyboy]

For the time being Huckabee has my vote. I think Obama will be easy to beat if he wins the nomination, which I hope he does. I am not looking for any kind of "progressive" in the White house. The problem with many of these politicians is that they will say whatever will get them elected. The waffling of Clinton and Juliani are eveidence of this. I wan't someone like Huckabee who is willing to wear his faith(my faith) on his sleeve and put his trust in God.

I just looked at Ron Pauls position on Illegal immigration and I can see why he has such support. His website says he wishes to end "birthright citizenship". He seems to be say what everyone wants to hear only the press is ignoring him for a reason. I can't help but think that if the press is ignoring him he might be worth listening to. CHECK THIS OUT.

[The Lorax]

He seems to be say what everyone wants to hear

I disagree. He's called "Doctor No" for a reason--he's a strict Constitutionalist. Take a look at his Congressional voting record. He opposes pretty much anything not advocated by the Constitution. Immigration would be a gray area, though, since it's not covered therein. I didn't know he thought that way about immigration--thanks for letting me know.

the press is ignoring him for a reason. I can't help but think that if the press is ignoring him he might be worth listening to. CHECK THIS OUT.

[faith pleases God]

I wan't someone like Huckabee who is willing to wear his faith(my faith) on his sleeve and put his trust in God.

Yeah- like Bush (no disrespect only humor intended)

Seriously though, I believe that politicians can easily be a wolf in sheeps clothing when it comes to wearing the cross. Keep in mind "believing" wins votes, ask Bush (candidates are aware of this). He professes faith, but I disagree with his politics. And as far as the press goes, Do you realize newspapers endorse canidates? How can they report without bias when they have a bias? I suspect the polls are construed. I was reading the USA today and on 4A, in a sidenote, was the reporting of Ron Paul's record setting day. Also on 4A was a half page article on Hillary and McCain. Both candidates are endorsed by the Des Moines Register. The owner of the register also owns the USA Today (Gannet, Inc.). To gain our perspectives through the eyes of the mainstream media trusting that the reporting is fair and balanced is disillusional and detrimental to our knowledge if we don't understand underlying agendas exist.

Edited December 19, 2007 by faith pleases God

[O'Dannyboy]

I wan't someone like Huckabee who is willing to wear his faith(my faith) on his sleeve and put his trust in God.

Yeah- like Bush (no disrespect only humor intended)

Seriously though, I believe that politicians can easily be a wolf in sheeps clothing when it comes to wearing the cross. Keep in mind "believing" wins votes, ask Bush (candidates are aware of this). He professes faith, but I disagree with his politics. And as far as the press goes, Do you realize newspapers endorse canidates? How can they report without bias when they have a bias? I suspect the polls are construed. I was reading the USA today and on 4A, in a sidenote, was the reporting of Ron Paul's record setting day. Also on 4A was a half page article on Hillary and McCain. Both candidates are endorsed by the Des Moines Register. The owner of the register also owns the USA Today (Gannet, Inc.). To gain our perspectives through the eyes of the mainstream media trusting that the reporting is fair and balanced is disillusional and detrimental to our knowledge if we don't understand underlying agendas exist.

Bush has been a disappointment but I still am thankful that Kerry did not win. Bush was the lesser of two evils and thats the ONLY reason he got re-elected. There is nothing that anyone can say that would make me regret my choice. I hadn't even been saved yet when I voted for him. All I saw was Bush roll his sleeves up ready to get to work while Kerry was flying his hairdresser around to give him high dollar hair cuts while badmouthing the U.S. and talking about an immediate withdrawal of the troops from Iraq.