Walksonlegs

Funny how there is only 2 options for an omnipotent God. Its not commanded by God, but the price of abortion is a fine (Exodus 21:22-24). That still does not justify killings of 2 year olds.

The right to life is a priori true. I do think that there is a gray area regarding abortion, but I do believe that a line needs to be drawn, especially before a child turns 2.

While I respect your belief and even support the overturning of Roe v Wade back to the states, I disagree with it. So, I am able to place myself in your shoes and understand that you equate a fetus with a 2 year old. I hope that you can place yourself in my shoes and realize that I am not advocating the slaughter of 2 year olds.

Like many of Obama's decision, I don't support this. I don't think a fetus is a child. I believe that a decision must be made in order to protect the sanctity of life and I believe that there is a gray area of 1-3 months. After the first trimester, I become less forgiving and think people have to live with their bad choices. Again, supporting abortion for the first trimester is not the same as supporting the ordering the slaughter of 2 year olds. Only twisted reasoning would assume that.

I am able to demarcate a fetus/reproductive right from a 2 year old. Obviously, you can't and think that I support killing of 2 years olds. You are one dishonest individual.

Then why are you defending Samuel 15:3 if you think murder is wrong? I support wise judgments. I also believe that a women has the right to abort a fetus under the first trimester. While, I think it was caused by an erroneous judgment, I don't think I have the right to stand in here decision. I also believe that doctors have the right to not perform a non-threatening surgery and I also believe that abortions shouldn't be supported by taxes. Again, I fail to see how aborting a fetus is equal to killing a 2 year old.

The President of the United States supports such a thing. While I disagree with Obama's stance on abortion, when has Obama ordered the murdering of 2 year olds?

The only person who muddying the waters is you by claiming that abortion of a fetus is the same thing as killing a newborn baby. Again, I will ask you if killing defensive children is moral?

I never asserted that nothing existed. If you got proof of nothing existing, then show it. Otherwise, don't distort my arguments. I do believe that evolution is more plausible than being descendants of an incestuous relationship that went bunk due to a talking snake. I also have no problem showing you that a woman does not come from a rib. Just offer one up.

Abortion and killing newborns are 2 different subjects. I never heard of someone who supports abortion wanting to kill newborns while I am hearing plenty of arguments supporting killing of defenseless children by supposedly "pro-life" people

Be crystal clear, are you defending the slaughtering of newborns?

You have a right to believe that we are the offspring of 2 people who lived for 930 years, in which one was born from a rib who talked to snakes. I have the right to seek a natural explanation rather than believe in facts that are incongruous to reality.

You have no moral compass. Killing defenseless children is wrong and worthy of an explanation.

I don't advocate killing children and sucklings. Obviously, others defend it.

"Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." I personally find the slaughtering of innocent people and defenseless children repugnant, but present your case.