All Activity

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Lol
  3. There is a story behind this. But I have told it and you have probably already heard it.
  4. Yes, missy
  5. Where did Shel go? Down the rabbit hole?
  6. Really?
  7. That reminds me of when I fell off a boyfriend's boat in the middle of the Columbia River
  8. That reminds me of someone.
  9. Yowm, Adam was not deceived? Hmmm. Let's look at the original sin together first: 6When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves. Back to spock: "she gave some to her husband who was with her...." It seems to me based on this passage, Adam is the bigger bonehead. He was right there. Could he have stopped Eve? If so, why didn't he? And then, if he couldn't, why did he eat it? Notice what Paul says in 1 Timothy 2: "woman was deceived and became a transgressor". Why is Paul not saying anything about Adam's wrongdoing here? Wasn't Adam at least equally at fault? So, how was Adam not deceived? If he wasn't deceived, what was he then? STUPID! MINDLESS! WHAT? Honestly, this passage creates more problems for me than not. I really don't know what point paul was making because it sounds like he was dumping that fateful moment in the garden on the woman!!!!!! Lastly, consider these words by Paul in 1 Cor 11: 11Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God.
  10. God uses both surely as a twofold witness. The living Word within born again believers (not in all men as some here contend) and the written Word. Though the written Word is God's Word, it's source is God Himself. (IMHO)
  11. Oh Kwik... that would be like me losing everything stored on both of my computers and all of our SD cards being destroyed. I do so understand. Pictures are so important for helping one hold on to precious memories. But thank God, at least they are not THEE most important thing.
  12. You're not 'accepting' a 'Natural Being' ?? Well that wasn't one of the choices, the 'Ontological Primitives' are: Nature (Unguided) vs God (Guided). "Vast Majority of Scientists" ? 1. Appeal to Popularity (Fallacy). 2. Begging The Question (Fallacy): Validate that each your appealing to is an actual "Scientist"...? 3. 'Vast Majority of Priests' will also work here. Good Question. Personally, Functional Sequence/Specified Complexity and Irreducible Complexity sealed the deal for me, initially; However INFORMATION by far10000--> renders any other explanation, Preposterous Ludicrousness Absurdity of the Highest Order. Yes, 'Nature" is. Uh oh, here we go with the clumsily contrived caricatures of my position... It's the exact opposite for me...and everything fit like a glove. Even if it was, Refute the Evidence...? We all have 'Biases'. This is tantamount to saying: "Any Fingers there I wonder ?" Yes, Is there another choice ?? Yes, of course. Ahh, No. You merely Asserted it, the 'Baseless' variety. Where'd you get: legs, pelvis remnants, and whales ...? 1. 'evolution' What's that...?? Define evolution...? 2. Post the *Scientific Theory* of evolution...? 3. Post the Formal Scientific Hypotheses then *Experiments* that concretized it into a *REAL* Scientific Theory...? 4. Highlight The Independent Variables used in Each TEST...? Post these disciplines, specifically...? Then I'll SHOW you whether they're Science or not and are worthy of being tossed out on their neck. Factually Incorrect. I tossed Einstein's sr/gr out on their respective necks, due to: 1. They were never "Scientific Theories" to begin with. 2. They have been "Scientifically" Falsified. 3. They've been Logically Falsified --- by 3rd Graders at Recess. 1. I never deal with peoples motives (Remember: "Acme of Foolishness"), and it's Fallacious... for the 6TH TIME!! 2. He died in 1955, I was born in 1963; Do the math. Well the Sun was made on Day 4... are you saying plants can't survive without the Sun for 24hrs ? Yes, he was 'Raptured'...(Elijah the other one); and Born Again Christians ('The Church') at any moment. That's Correct Yes. One correction: The Sun, Moon, and Stars are the 'Light Producing Objects'. Well it's quite clear that 'Erev and Boker' (Evening and Morning) have to do with Entropy and most likely became associated with evening and morning... in colloquial vernacular, at some later point. How do we know?? Well... There is no 'evening and morning' on the Seventh Day...i.e., God isn't reducing Entropy on the Seventh Day, HE'S Resting (That's not quite accurate, the language used there is denoting that HE'S giving the Creation a repose) This is quite Nonsensical, Why Would I ?? This is tantamount to saying: "I hope you won't attempt to treat Rib Eyes as Flowers". Rest Assured, I wont. Since Genesis week happened in the Un-Observable Past, how could I get to the First Step of The Scientific Method? Let alone form a Valid Formal Scientific Hypothesis then TEST (Hypothesis TEST) it? Thanks!! "Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: *YE MUST HAVE FAITH*. It is a quality which the scientist cannot dispense with." Max Planck (Nobel Prize, Physics): WHERE IS SCIENCE GOING?; translated by James Vincent Murphy (1932), p. 214 So either you're Right and Max Planck is wrong and/or You're Equivocating (Fallacy) with the word " FAITH ". Guess where My Bet's going... "ALL IN !!" ?? regards
  13. Praying, brother!!
  14. My dad put his dad's slides and a bunch of family photos on microSD cards, so we siblings have copies of them.
  15. Yesterday
  16. OO this is the one I thought was a salt water fish ??? never heard of a fresh water striped bass before. Awesome pics!
  17. I don't know. The Bible doesn't tell us everything we would like to know. There are a lot of nuts and bolts we will simply have to wait to find out about. We will know when it comes to pass and we are in the millennium.
  18. I take the 'we are all one In Christ' as referring to our standing before God in Christ. I'm not sure what other epistles Paul applauds women teachers unless they are teaching younger women or children. When Paul forbids a woman to exercise authority in teaching a man, he links his reason back to Adam and Eve thus transcending cultures. Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. (1Ti 2:11-14)
  19. You wrote that entire post! (Scratching my head) Who are you, brother? Can I join your blog? If so, let me have the info I need either on here or PM me.
  20. My righteousness already exceeds that of the Scribes and the Pharisees because Jesus is the one who made me righteous. I am justified by faith in the finished work of Jesus on the cross. I am not trying to make myself righteous and there is certainly no reason for me to listen the Scribes and Pharisees. They are in hell.
  21. Interesting that you say the main contribution of the Crusaders were their descendants, as if the Crusaders themselves from 1091-1295 were pretty useless. I agree. http://www.history.com/topics/crusades
  22. Hello Knower, Mixing the 2 is like saying I'll mix black & white, honey & chili they are completely opposed to each other, You will come up with a different flavor, , but not pure. You said yourself you may come up with a completely different movement, Jesus was very clear on the way to salvation there was no two roads. You also mentioned different truth which is a oxymoron. I hope you find your way God bless.
  23. Our sermon today was in Collassians with Ephesians. Great sermon!
  24. Indeed, my case in that blog post I wrote for my blog is that why would Paul say women can't teach and then applaud women teachers in other epistles and end with "there is no male or female, all are one in Christ." It stands to reason that Paul's rebuke to Corinth was on grounds of pythonesses. That it was for specific church, not all churches.
  25. Also praying.
  26. Amen brother.
  1. Load more activity