Citizenship

No, it is an assumption made by evolutionists, so please don't assert something you cannot prove. If hands and feet can produce extra bones, tissues, skin and so on then so can the coccyx. If "genes for making stuff" were accidently being turned on after 20 million years or so then the entire animal kingdom would be riddled with such cases. As I said, there are no "genes for making tails". Instead there are plenty of abnormalities that evolutionists can use to pick and choose among in order to provide "evidence of evolution". Perhaps you think that the Indonesian "tree-man" has "genes for making a tree"? That would be quite a "throwback"!

No, that is not what we find. Why do people read what evolutionists believe, (or like to believe), and then present them as though they were verifiable facts? No human on the face of this planet has regulatory genes that are marked "these are genes for making a tail". These are the kind of ideas that evolutionists like to sow into the minds of the unsuspecting, simply because the lack of evidence for evolution makes such things necessary. You might as well say that people have "genes for making six fingers", or any other similar growth defect.