neil_

The post above is for JDavis. I don't know what happens with quotation system. I tried to correct it, but it didn't work. I apologize.

Nothing said? Buddy, it was you who claimed trips to the Moon use heliocentric calculations. I just woke you up to reality. Now, are there other things you’d like to know, or you’ll just prefer to keep your head in the sand and pretend the reality is how you say it is? By the way, where exactly did you learn physics? Because I can tell you right now you can safely throw your diplomas away: they are no good to you. And please don’t call this a personal attack. On the contrary, I’d like for you to get a real education. I am sure not even you know exactly what you are. So far I only see you making personal attacks. Prior to me coming here you looked very convinced that your universe (the big bang universe) exists. Now, instead of defending your universe (that would be scientific, wouldn’t it?), you make instead personal attacks. Which speaks loudly about both your credentials and your character. It’s no surprise to me that you don’t actually know what science is. Buddy, it’s not that you’re allowed to make any claim you want and the others have to disprove it, on the contrary, you have to prove each and every of your claims. Now, once you prove your claim, don’t worry, it will be very easy for me (guaranteed) to disprove it.

That happens, you know, when one uses his or her own mind, instead of blindly believing whatever they were fed in pseudo-schools. I’m not sure how many times I have to tell you that evolution has nothing to do with science. Neither of its forms. Regardless if billions of people on Earth emptily claim it has, this doesn’t mean that it has. Instead, it only shows the “quality” of education lately. That’s why I’m sorry but it’s not much of an effort to prove your beliefs wrong. Really… Which speaks loudly about the “quality” of “science” in things that you believe in.

Then I strongly suggest you change your buddies. You have nothing to learn from them. Regardless, now you are privileged to have met me. I am quite amused each time I meet evolutionists. Because they never ever really know what they believe in - they are simply too busy believing. Buddy, for your information, what EACH AND EVERY launch (into either local orbit or space) uses are 2 references frames. Both of them are geo-centric. One of them is fully geo-centric (i.e. including geo-static). They are called ECEF and ECI. The ‘E’ stands for Earth – just in case you wouldn’t know… I strongly suggest you go find a proper education before talking about things that you don’t know. This time, a real education – one that isn’t too busy indoctrinating people with false beliefs such as evolution. Oh, and just for the fun of it, could you tell me the size of your universe? You know, the big bang universe. Trust me, I know what you’re going to say, and it’s wrong. Ironically, not wrong according to my standards (regardless that according to me the universe is much smaller), but according to yours (or should I say theirs). But I’m waiting for you to specify the size, to prove you wrong. It will be my pleasure, as always, to correct evolutionists in what THEY believe…

Thank you. What are they? Common, it’s not that hard: accelerated expansion. I’m a YEC. So I’m not sure if you can use “fellow” in there, since you eagerly believe what they indoctrinated you in schools with. Nothing other than it’s false. And it takes me just one word to prove it false. Would you dare to guess? That’s really strange, since the conversation (the entire thread actually) is about big bang. Today doesn’t exist in your universe. Would you like to know why, or you can take it from here? For one, biological evolution is not science because it’s not observable, testable and repeatable. For the rest (falsifiability), read Popper. Then, it involves a huge amount of faith (even more: blind faith). Unlike Creationism, which is immensely more logical and requires immensely less faith.

Actually, his most important opera is about the Bible. By far. And in regard to his cosmologic endeavours, he was wrong.

Discovered? Perhaps you meant promoted it. Because, to this day, it’s no certainty at all. First, it’s Kepler. Then, those laws are wrong, so don’t bother getting the name right. You have the wrong heroes. Certainly Kepler went a long way AGAINST the Bible. Also, Galileo not only did not have any proof for the idea that he supported (really none – a situation falsely taught otherwise in today’s schools), but the situation has stayed the same to this day (i.e. there is still no proof for heliocentrism).

It’s not even true… And by the way, there are multiple theories of gravity, not just Einstein’s (and obviously not including Newton). I can tell you one thing about gravity which is true: it doesn’t work. Do you want me to tell you why, or you can do your own research?

How interesting that the famous spacetime doesn’t actually exist. So simple to prove - only three words… It’s amusing how evolutionists (cosmic evolutionists in this case) must invoke other universes each time this universe proves them wrong.

Actually, big bang is wrong. And it’s so simple to prove that. Literally, it would only take 2 words… Good. Then you don’t believe in evolution. But then why exactly would you believe in cosmic evolution (aka big bang)? You’re contradicting yourself. Big bang cosmology covers the entire time (except the very beginning) – including today. Which by the way, in your universe doesn’t exist. Evolution and science clearly don’t belong in the same sentence (unless you use one to negate the other). Popper clearly proved that in regard to both big bang cosmology and biological evolution. If you believe so dearly in what evolutionists promote with their godless agendas, then how exactly did you miss terms like “cosmic evolution”, “geologic evolution”, “chemical evolution”?

Perhaps you meant “looking for more questions”, instead of answers. Perhaps you meant Hawking’s old proposal. Indeed, the most important exists outside time. The rest will soon get to pass, together with time itself. Absolutely. I’ll leave others here to provide such evidence in regard to biological evolution. In regard to cosmology however, if you’re asking me you’re asking the right person. Correct. This once again proves the Bible right (the world has never wanted God). You obviously mean prestigious EVOLUTIONARY journals. Which never include Creationist science. So there’s your answer.