Mister Bill

Stay with God. He'll tell you what he wants you to do.

Thanks for your views everyone. While we're on the subject of proof I'll pass on something else. On the site where I got "definition", when the unbeliever demanded proof of God I nicely demanded proof that there wasn't one. The atheists came out of the woodwork and basically told me that a negative couldn't be proven. My question to them is that if non-existence of God can't be proven as they say why are they so willing to accept that? I'm not talking popular opinion or someone's idea. I'm talking the kind of proof they expect believers to provide. Seems to be a double standard. If anyone has a comment or thinks I'm wrong I'd be glad to read it.

Years ago someone posted this on a different site after someone demanded proof of God's existence. I liked it so much that I copied it so I could share it with others. - not only is there no proof, faith demands no proof. It is not science. Faith by nature and definition is destroyed by proof, for then it is something different: fact. So, in effect,you want a Christian to give you something he or she cannot if they are true to God or if they do, simply prove that they are not true to their God.-

It's a double standard. If someone on the right said this about someone on the left, there would be hell to pay.