Jump to content


Royal Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

8,195 Excellent


About OakWood

  • Rank
    Royal Member
  • Birthday 04/28/1964

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    South Coast, Great Britain
  • Interests
    Archery, painting, plants and animals, Medieval history

Recent Profile Visitors

4,823 profile views
  1. OakWood

    As a Man Thinketh . . .

    I love this YouTube channel.
  2. OakWood

    How old is the book of Job? (pre-flood)

    Thanks for your input. I'll consider what you have said in your post.
  3. OakWood

    How old is the book of Job? (pre-flood)

    Actually, there's no evidence of any major ice age (apart from the one that Evolutionists tell us happened 10,000 years ago, which predates Moses anyway), so I don't understand how you come to the conclusion that dinosaurs lived after the great flood until the Ice Age. Job's references to ice, don't necessary refer to an Ice Age and if they do, which one is it? Is it one that we've never heard of, that neither Creationist nor Evolutionists have ever mentioned or envisaged? As for your theory about the King James translation of 'giant':- well if you read the Book of Job then it's clear that he is referring to a giant, as in - a very, very large person. The words 'mighty' and 'warrior' make no sense in the context of which he is talking about. Job 7 may refer to his affliction occurring only a few months, but he was still suffering his affliction during this time. However, you have made some compelling points about Job's lifespan. I'm not defending the position of an antediluvian book, just thinking about it and whether there is any evidence or not. In fact, since reading the book again, I've found more evidence that suggests that Job is NOT a pre-flood book, but I'm still keeping an open mind. Thanks for your input.
  4. There are a number of YouTube videos on this subject, but they are too long to post in the video section. Could the Book of Job have been written before the great flood? Was it brought across on Noah's ark, so that it could be preserved for future generations? I refer to three chapters in particular. Job 1 refers to Job's lineage and background - he has a lot of sons and a lot of land. People lived a lot longer before the flood. It takes time to produce children and generate wealth, especially when most didn't even marry then until they were around 50 years old.. Job 40 refers to the Behometh, possibly a large reptile (or dinosaur) which sounds like a pre-flood animal. (verse 15 onwards) Job 16 mentions a giant. After the flood the giants were fewer in number and God was concerned with wiping out the remnants of such races, but Job 16 mentions them as if they were something that Job would be familiar with in the world that he lived in. The time of Job's terrible trial and tribulation appears to be a very long one, lasting many years - only appropriate to someone with a very long lifetime. If we look at another verse: Job 42:16 Job lived another hundred and forty years - after his long trial and suffering, and after having even more children. Other facts: Nobody in the Book of Job is mentioned in the post-flood table of nations. Although certain post-flood peoples are mentioned in the Book of Job, these could be duplicates. Many peoples were renamed after people before them. One example is Job's friend Eliphaz. Here's another verse: Jog 15:10 This refers to living gray-haired men much older even than Job's father. If Job is old, then how old are these guys? The Book of Job does refer to a flood that happened before - but there is also another great flood before the flood of Noah! At the moment I'm sitting on the fence on this one, but I would appreciate more input on this discussion.
  5. OakWood

    The myth of Pagan roots of Christianity

    Well, the story of Mithras, for example, was completely different to Jesus at one time, but later writers changed it and claimed that Mithras was born of a virgin. There are other examples that I can't think of off the top of my head. The point I'm trying to make is that Atheists used the revised versions of these myths, not the original versions of these myths, to claim similarities between the Bible and Paganism. But also as you have already stated, the Jesus story was changed too, to match Pagan myths. This has caused confusion among people who haven't bothered to check their history.
  6. OakWood

    The myth of Pagan roots of Christianity

    The problem is that Satan tries to reverse history and claims that the Pagan myths came first and Jesus came afterwards.But the reality is that Jesus came before the Pagan myths - or rather, Jesus came before the Pagan myths were rewritten and adapted to copy the story of Jesus. So, for example - there may be a Pagan god who was worshipped long before Jesus came, but his story was originally completely different. After Jesus came the Pagan god's story was re-written to roughly match the story of Jesus. This causes people to believe that the story of Jesus was copied from a Pagan myth because the Pagan god was being worshipped before Jesus arrived. The problem with Atheists and other mockers of Christianity is that they don't research their history - they just believe what they have been told by other Atheists. In fact, most Atheists and other scoffers are guilty of doing the very things they accuse Christians of doing. Atheists accuse Christian of being stupid, superstitious idiots who believe everything they are told without testing it, but in reality most Christians examine the evidence and use discernment. It is the Atheists who believe what they are told without testing it. They believe in Evolution, they believe in the Big-Bang, and they believe in false science. They are either too lazy or too afraid to test such claims. They believe in such nonsense because men in white coats with lots of letters after their names tell them that such a reality is so. In other words, Atheism is nothing other than a religion, because Atheists believe what the high priests of scientism tell them; and they believe it obediently and without question!
  7. Atheists and other Christian-bashers love to claim that the story of Jesus was stolen from Pagan religions, but nothing could be further from the truth. It is more likely that Pagan myths were later twisted to form a counterfeit of Christianity:
  8. OakWood

    Three Facts Those Promoting Transgenderism Ignore

    I agree with you. It is wrong for adults; but to set a bad example to children is one thing - to coerce or manipulate children into such depravity is quite another. I am reminded of Luke 17:2.
  9. This is probably coming next. Satan never stops sowing the seeds of depravity, and as we approach the End Times things are going to get worse. We must protect children from this evil.
  10. OakWood

    Three Facts Those Promoting Transgenderism Ignore

    You're right Shiloh, it's not. But at least an adult is old enough to be accountable for the fruits of their sins. To inflict such confusion upon children is a gross abomination worthy of severe judgement, and is far... far worse!
  11. OakWood

    North Star Never Moves.

    Shiloh, you're talking nonsense. Your pride is driving you to blasphemy against the Lord. You've contradicted yourself in similar posts so many times that I'm beginning to fear for your soul. The Bible does not support a globe earth - PERIOD! Stop rejecting scripture and stop rejecting the Holy Spirit. You said yourself that the Bible is meant to be taken literally unless it says otherwise. Nothing gives support that the Biblical references to our earth are anything other than literal. The earth does NOT move. The Bible tells us that. Simple empirical scientific experiments prove that the earth does not move. This is irrefutable. You clearly know nothing about real science that is based on testability, observation and duplication. This is REAL science based on the scientific method. Not one single verse in the Bible tells us that the earth moves around the Sun. Stop calling God a liar!! Ancient peoples believed the earth was flat. They knew it was flat. You have provided no evidence to suggest otherwise. I can provide lots of evidence to show that the Ancients believed in a flat earth. Why do you persist in defending the satanic globe? What can you possibly gain from defending wickedness? As for your claim about NASA employees, well that's just naive. Do you not realise that most NASA employees are ground-based. They haven't a clue about their employer's deceptions any more than you have. It takes a lot of money. technology and effort to fly even above 100, oo0 feet. Most people have never been higher. Most NASA employees are not aware of the hoax. Instead of preaching 'critical thinking' to others, why not apply some critical thinking yourself? And as for your claim that people who believe in a flat earth have abandoned intelligent thinking, well that's disgusting. You're in for a nasty shock. Instead of being stubborn and arrogant, why don't you humble yourself and pray to God to tell you whether the flat earth is a lie or not, if you're so worried that it is just a false conspiracy? Pray to Jesus that you are not deceived. He will reveal to you whether the globe is true or not. Ask God to reveal the truth to you, and avoid yourself some great shame and embarrassment at a later date!
  12. OakWood


    The reason that their lifestyle has been given so much focus, and that they have gained so much power in the last few decades is because the elites that run this world have brainwashed most of society into accepting the 'gay' lifestyle. Don't forget that the 'elite' control the press, TV, Hollywood, and the music industry. Homosexuals are fooling themselves if they think they are on the verge of some future 'gay' utopia. They are 'useful idiots' that are being used to destroy Western society which was developed on Judeo-Christian morals. Once a one-world government is established, homosexuals will be among the first to be lined up against the wall and shot. The long-term plan of the Illuminati is to usher in the reign of the Anti-Christ, but they can only do this by destroying our current civilizations and making us submit to their rule. The plan was developed a long time ago. Its first goal was to use Cultural Marxism to reprogram everyone. One aim was to destroy the concept of the traditional family, and make children dependent upon the state. This has been achieved by rewarding fornication by encouraging single-parent families. There is so much divorce today. Another has been by the use of homosexuality which is being used to create the idea of alternative types of family by encouraging gay marriage and gay adoptions. The second goal of the 'elite' is a massive reduction in world population because they cannot enslave seven billion people - they want to reduce the world's population to a billion or less. They will achieve this through wars, diseases and famines but in the meantime they want everybody to get used to the idea of depopulation by making everyone think that there are too many of us on the planet already. They have already been successful to some extent by use of the environmental movement which uses the man-made global warming lie to fool everyone into thinking that human beings are parasites that are damaging the earth. This is in direct contrast to God's command to 'go forth and multiply'. Homosexuality is also a useful tool to help depopulation because they don't normally reproduce (new life cannot be created through homosexual sex). Once depopulation has been achieved, then reproduction will continue as normal in order to maintain the population status quo and replenish the world with a constant supply of slaves, but all children will be brainwashed by the state and effectively be wards of the state. They will be 'educated' from an early age by a state schooling system and be taught to love 'big brother'. They will report to the authorities anybody who is seen as being an enemy of the state including their own parents who will have been little more than 'baby-making machines'. The elites will live in luxury and the rest of the world will work for slave wages to cater for the privileged few. Dissent will not be tolerated. The gulags and the death camps will await anybody who dares to protest against the state. Christianity will be abolished and the last remaining Christians persecuted and murdered in the thousands, if not millions. There is nothing we can do to stop this, but Jesus will return and he will destroy the Illuminati and put an end to their world rule. At the very highest levels the elite Illuminati families are all Luciferans. They worship Satan, and they look down at the rest of us, seeing us as nothing more than 'useless eaters'.
  13. OakWood


    BECAUSE.... Thieves do not demand equal rights for thieves Adulterers do not go on 'Adultery pride' marches.... Liars do not lobby government to call for extra privileges for those who tell lies. To my knowledge, homosexual practice is the only sin that declares itself not to be a sin, and in some cases even declares itself to be righteous! Perhaps you should think about this, and then you will understand why there is so much Christian focus on homosexuality.
  14. OakWood

    North Star Never Moves.

    There is absolutely no Common Sense whatsoever in a globe Earth, so I find it astonishing that you brandish the words "Common Sense" as if you are some sort of expert on it - when it is clear that you are not. If you take a commercial airline at 30,00 feet then it is true that you will see a curved edge but then again any 7-year-old will tell you that a flat disk also has a curved edge. The difference is whether the curve is 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional. A 3-dimensional curve is NEVER seen from any airplane. THAT'S A FACT! What you see when you look out of a plane is merely the horizon (which is the limit of your vision because the naked eye can only see so far), but the horizon is visible in all directions if you turn around, and therefore it will appear as a 360 degree circle. If the Earth was a globe or a sphere then it would also curve downwards - which it never does. This is so astonishingly simple to grasp that I am surprised that you have not yet done so. As for empirical evidence, well I suggest that you buy yourself a dictionary and discover what the word 'empirical' actually means. Every single scientific experiment WITHOUT EXCEPTION has proven that the earth does not move, including the famous Michelson-Morley experiment which has never been debunked but instead has been deliberately ignored by modern academia. We don't even need scientific experiments to tell us that the earth does not move. Our own Common Sense tells us that. If the earth was moving then every time that I jumped up and down, I would never land on the same spot as the ground would be moving beneath my feet. And don't try to tell me that the atmosphere pushes me along, as the 'official scientific explanation' claims. Are you telling me that the air can push me along at 1,000 mph, yet even a butterfly can resist it by flying in any direction it chooses? And if the air can easily push me along then why do I have no trouble walking when I choose to walk in the opposite direction that the earth rotates? Why I am not impeded by a 1,000 mp0h wind? And what exactly is it that holds the earth's atmosphere in place and stops it diffusing into Outer Space? Oh yes, I remember; it's gravity - a force strong enough to make the atmosphere stick fast to the earth and move along with it, but by amazing coincidence is not strong enough to stop a balloon from rising or a paper plane from soaring without plummeting to earth like a brick. I studied chemistry at university and I can tell you that all this rubbish about the earth's atmosphere being held to earth by gravity is nonsense. It's a known fact that any body of high pressure will rapidly move to a body of lower pressure; so what is it that is stopping the earth's atmosphere from disappearing into the zero-pressure vacuum of Outer Space? Gravity is not strong enough - it can't even stop a bumble bee from flying upwards, nor can it stop me from pointing my face towards the sky and blowing air upwards out of my mouth. We live in an enclosed system, a terrarium sealed by the dome of the firmament. Nothing can get in and nothing can get out (unless God allows it). There is no 'open' exit to a heavenly vacuum, instead there is a ceiling above us just as the Bible tells us, and the earth does not spin around. Rational thinking tells us that. The only so-called evidence that we have of a moving globe earth is from the photo-shopped fake photographs of NASA and other space agencies, and from the ramblings of theoretical physicists (which have proven nothing, but merely make insubstantial claims based on false teachings). The earth DOES NOT MOVE and the Lord himself tells us that. (1 Samuel 2:8, 2 Samuel 22:8, Psalm 104L5, plus a number of other verses). He has never mentioned the existence of other planets, despite being kind enough to give us an overview of creation as documented in Genesis 1. Nor does he mention that the earth revolves around the Sun (because it does not). Nor does he ever mention the existence of an imaginary vacuum known as 'Outer Space', instead he clearly tells us that there is a firmament above us - with stars in the firmament - and water above it. Now I realize that God does not give us every detail, but if the earth really did revolve around the Sun then he would have missed out a pretty major fact by not telling us that. Stop adding extra things to scripture, and instead stick to the word of God. Heliocentrism is a lie that dates back thousands of years, and is linked to the Paganistic idea of Sun worship, where the Sun was placed at the centre of everything. 1/ There is a firmament above us... 2/ The stars are in the firmament (not above it) 3/ Waters are above the firmament (therefore the waters are ABOVE the stars.) These three points are clearly confirmed by reading Genesis 1!!
  15. OakWood


    The word vicar is derived from Latin, as is 'vicarious' which means 'substitute' or 'in place of another'. So 'vicar of christ' means more or less the same thing as 'Antichrist'. The RCC did not form until the 4th Century AD (over two hundred years after Peter's death), and was really just a make-over of the Roman government - until then zealous persecutors of Christians. So Peter and his followers were persecuted by Rome until Rome decided (somewhat dubiously) to adopt Christianity. How can the RCC be the 'true Church' if it had been persecuting Christians for nearly three hundred years? Did the true Church at one time persecute itself? Despite the Vatican's persecution, torture and murder of those who refused to follow the doctrines of Rome, Christianity refused to die out, and that is why we still have the word of God today.. This is what Jesus meant when he said to Peter: "That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Catholics cannot use the claim that this sort of persecution no longer exists, because that's not the point. All the decrees to torture, burn and kill were done by Popes and Popes are meant to be infallible in matters of the word of God. If it is now acknowledged that those decrees were wrong (and in contravention of the Ten Commandments) then there is no such thing as infallibility of the Pope. In fact if just one Pope can be proven to have made a mistake in spiritual matters then the entire doctrine of infallibility comes crashing down like a house of cards, and there is absolutely no sound reason, (never mind a divine one) to trust without question the word of one single Pope. If one Pope is wrong, they could all be wrong! From the teachings of Catholics themselves (so they have no excuse by blaming these accusations on non-Catholic sources): Roman Catholics use Mary and other 'saints' to intercede with Jesus. This is clearly in contravention of scripture. 1 Timothy 2:5 tells us that there is "one God, and one mediator BETWEEN God and men, the man Christ Jesus". How many Gods are there? ONE. How many mediators are there? ONE. It baffles me how often Catholics fail to understand the meaning of the word 'one.' The Pope is called 'father'. Even lowly priests are called 'father'. This is in contravention of Matthew 23:9. I could go on, but I'll save it all for another time.