BeyondET

Fossils do provide evidence, I'll pick one like where the brain resides, earlier humans had smaller craniums. You presenting something that can happen under the right conditions isn't a reality check on counter evolution. I think you don't have anything to prove otherwise. Certainly not water creeping into a casket, creating a condition that doesn't normally happen.

It's likely the someone mentioned in Luke 9, was alone. 49 Master,” said John, “we saw someone driving out demons in Your name, and we tried to stop him, because he does not accompany us.” 50 “Do not stop him,” Jesus replied, “for whoever is not against you is for you.”

None of that shows evidence that counters evolution. People find petrified and fossilized items that are old. Lots of things can happen under the right conditions, certainly doesn't point to a 6,000 year old earth. There's tree colonies twice as old as that.

The process your describing is intervening to make it happen that's not a good comparison.

You can make coal too, what does amber have to do with the price of eggs. Bones, shells, stone imprints are all fossils. Satan could care less about fossils.

That was in the beginning, day four starts off with let there be lights in the expanse. Later the sun moon stars are placed in the expanse.

Lights in the expanse was before those.

In English, well sometimes slang like back in the day. Really there doesn't even need a time frame for each day, it's something no human was there and it's not salvation based. You believe earth is 6k I think it's much older. Actually according to scripture the lights is the expanse are for seasons, days, years, the sun hadn't even been created yet.

Actually you twisted the mathematics for your own opinion with the 1 in 10 to the 6,000th power. The only difference between one or the other. Is one hypothesis has one species giving rise in a couple of categories. Which still even computer models can't go back any farther than the rock impressions of ancient microfossils. The "best competing multiple ancestry hypothesis" has one species giving rise to bacteria and one giving rise to Archaea and eukaryotes, said Theobald, a biochemist at Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts. But, based on the new analysis, the odds of that are "just astronomically enormous," he said. "The number's so big, it's kind of silly to say it"—1 in 10 to the 2,680th power, or 1 followed by 2,680 zeros

A single ancestor still isn't saying just one animal or one plant. The ancestor single species can be comprised of billions. Reading the source provided about how far back man has gotten is only to microfossils and impressions in rocks of soft body organisms which isn't no where near the beginning of life on Earth. A clip from the link you posted. Fossils are important for estimating when various lineages developed in geologic time. As fossilization is an uncommon occurrence, usually requiring hard body parts and death near a site where sediments are being deposited, the fossil record only provides sparse and intermittent information about the evolution of life. Evidence of organisms prior to the development of hard body parts such as shells, bones and teeth is especially scarce, but exists in the form of ancient microfossils, as well as impressions of various soft-bodied organisms.

Man is the highest life form on earth though there's some slime that has higher designing skills than man. All of God's plan for His creations. God is supernatural but that doesn't mean that creation was instantly like making a clone earth to look old so no one can determine its age. Jesus in the flesh was a supernatural creation but it still took 9 months to be born. Dirt to man wasn't in a whirlwind creation or zap~man. Six days of evening(chaos and morning(order), thus in the day that God created the heavens and earth. It's not referring to 24 hour each. Genesis means "In the beginning".

I don't think there's any theory that has life starting with only one plant and animal.

Sure there was water in the beginning, and a earth that stood out from it no water, then in the water. After that God was hovering over the waters. 2 Peter 3 4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Water under the bridge my friend, I respect that, thank you. 😊

Indeed that was a total lack of discernment.

It wasn't recreated, restored

You will see me on judgment day we will stand side by side. Because I never said God is a lier.

You said the reason why it would be a waste of time to post sources for you. I could post a thousand and it wouldn't matter to you.

Can you explain that a bit more, earth has a reservation in fire it is stated in Revelation earth will be cast into fire. I don't get your point?

Microevolution over thousands of years ends up being macroevolution. You saying no one has seen a cat give birth to a dog is ignorant even on the knowledge of macroevolution which doesn't happen like that The idea of a young earth is ridiculous. It lacks any support in the Bible as well. And especially any support in the real science. There's never been any claims to a young earth by scientist.

The timeline of the verse I posted is a day. I think they were inspired to be added and for quite a few reasons not just simplicity.

That would be Genesis 1:31, Gen 2:4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made them.

So a animal that adapts, gains the ability to have protective shapes and colors that the parent's didn't have isn't evolution huh. That's exactly what you said, adapt to have protective shapes and colors and that certainly means the parent's didn't have protective shapes and colors. The animal with protective shape and color will then pass the genes on for its young to survive with the same shape and color. Then animal migrates to another area and the process repeats itself, adapting to the new environment creating new genes to survive. Your body creates new genetic cells often from scratch, when ever a different pathogen enters the body that's not known to the immune system. Your immune system will create new genetic cells evolved to fight the pathogen.

Verse 7 says but the heavens and earth which are now. Is saying there was a prior heavens and earth before the now heavens and earth.

The only text given on where man came from is dirt. Nothing says it was instant or each minute a whole process of evolvment happened which lead to man. The final purpose on earth.