Interesting. If Jesus said the children of this world marry but the children that are worthy of the resurrection do not, I tend to hold that higher than any one else's teachings that followed. I would also add that Jeremiah was forbidden to marry and if he had disobeyed and gotten married it would have been an offense to God, a sin, but Paul says those who marry have not sinned which leaves out the right for God's authority to call them to remain single. It seems, at times, by his own confession, that Paul's judgements are his own and not of the Lord, therefore, I am wary of his teaching always.
Luke 18:29 And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or WIFE, or children, for The Kingdom of God's sake,
18:30 Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come Life Everlasting.
Matthew 19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from [their] mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for The Kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive [it], let him receive [it].
Although I do not see Jesus expressly forbidding marriage, I do see him pointing to or hinting at the idea that those who will be chosen to be accounted worthy of the resurrection are those who remain unencumbered by a wife but I also realize I am not the one who decides on which men get the anointing. It does however make me suspicious of men who claim to have it yet who also engage in pleasures of the flesh. If the body is dead, that would be difficult to do without raising thoughts of lust in my opinion.