Jump to content
IGNORED

Hidden Agenda in Iraq?


ted

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  226
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/24/1945

Double Post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  226
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/24/1945

On that I have to agree with Ovedya.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  276
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  7,474
  • Content Per Day:  0.96
  • Reputation:   51
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/25/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/31/1966

ON politics unfortunately I am more in disagreement with Ted & Ovedya.

A sure sign that I'm correct then. :)

:):)

:)

t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  375
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  11,400
  • Content Per Day:  1.44
  • Reputation:   125
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/30/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1971

As long as we worship the same Lord, we'll be just fine. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  226
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/24/1945

Yeow!

Which means that we were lied to about the reason to go to war. It also mean the world community was lied to so we could go to war. Which mean the President would not have gotten permission from congress. All of which makes the war illegal which makes this administration criminals.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Most-High rightfully brings us back on topic.

The lies that have brought us into a war of preemption are beginning to be exposed.

First off we must remember "Preemptive War

Link to comment
Share on other sites

=Most High,Jun 23 2005, 05:36 PM

Which means that we were lied to about the reason to go to war. It also mean the world community was lied to so we could go to war. Which mean the President would not have gotten permission from congress. All of which makes the war illegal which makes this administration criminals.

bahhhloney.

WMDs was never the reason for the war. Where were all you folks when Bush gave that speech on television? The rest of us saw him give the reasons and WMD wasn't one of them.....yet you guys must have been on another planet that day?

WMD was only mentioned in relevance to the urgency of endless chatter from the UN.

The lies that have brought us into a war of preemption are beginning to be exposed.

First off we must remember "Preemptive War

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest charlie

Yod, you are a prime example of the danger of mixing religion and politics.

I bet I could look thru your posts and find many where you yourself were howling WMDs! WMDs!

At least you've dropped THAT pretense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  226
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/24/1945

Hello Yod!

Time to go to school! . And time for a reality check.

WMDs was never the reason for the war. Where were all you folks when Bush gave that speech on television? The rest of us saw him give the reasons and WMD wasn't one of them.....yet you guys must have been on another planet that day?

WMD was only mentioned in relevance to the urgency of endless chatter from the UN.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The original justification given by this administration was that Iraq had WMD in direct violation to the surrender agreement made after Desert Storm.

THAT WAS THE RATIONAL. THAT WAS THE OSTENSIBLE JUSTIFICATION

He has WMD in direct contradiction to UN agreement, We have legal right to invade.

FACT -- He did not. He opened and allowed to invasive inspection.

UN found no WMD - The Neocon administration went ahead with invasion.

From the

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  226
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/24/1945

And Again

It is obscenely vulgar to compare us to the Nazis. There is absolutely no comparison to be made between us and the aggressive blitzkriegs and subjugatoin of the populace that Hitler foisted on Europe and eastward.

If you really hate America that much then maybe you should check out Sudan? I hear land is cheap in the south.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This "You Hate America Line" is getting a bit tired.

It is a lame and personal attack. You should be able to do better than that Yod.

It is present criminal policy that I take umbrage with. Not "The United States of America."

In case you do not know,

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  226
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/24/1945

And Finally:

War Without Reason

The total collapse of Bush's arguments for invading Iraq.

By Fred Kaplan

Posted Friday, Oct. 8, 2004, at 2:17 PM PT

http://slate.msn.com/id/2108000#ContinueArticle

The official rationales for the war in Iraq now lie in tatters. Earlier in the week, the CIA and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld conceded that Saddam Hussein had no links to al-Qaida. Yesterday, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney accepted the findings of Charles Duelfer, their chief weapons inspector, that Saddam didn't have WMD after all.

The Duelfer report, President Bush said to reporters on the South Lawn, "confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there." Yet, he quickly added, going to war was still the right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...