Why Is The Torah Important?

[Guest yod]

pointer seems to be pointless.

Can't answer any objections...only offers opinions without explaining where they come from.

[pointer]

No, you answered in mockery saying "black is white, too."

Mockery? What was I mocking, shiloh?

[Guest shiloh357]

No, you answered in mockery saying "black is white, too."

Mockery? What was I mocking, shiloh?

I said that the verse you provided did not support your definition of "flesh." You responded with "black is white too." It was mocking answer meant to belittle my response. At least that is how it comes across. You could have responded by explaining and supporting your position instead you respond with silly nonsense. When you want to provide an intelligent, thoughtful and respectable answer as would be expected from a thinking person let me know. Otherwise your nonsensical silliness will be ignored.

[pointer]

No, you answered in mockery saying "black is white, too."

Mockery? What was I mocking, shiloh?

I said that the verse you provided did not support your definition of "flesh." You responded with "black is white too." It was mocking answer meant to belittle my response.

Please answer the question. What was there about your response to belittle?

[Guest shiloh357]

No, you answered in mockery saying "black is white, too."

Mockery? What was I mocking, shiloh?

I said that the verse you provided did not support your definition of "flesh." You responded with "black is white too." It was mocking answer meant to belittle my response.

Please answer the question. What was there about your response to belittle?

I have answered your question. It came across as belittlement because I said your answer did not support your definition of flesh. And your response came across as if you were making fun of my answer. Now either demonstrate that the verse provided does support your assertion, and thus we can get back on topic, or drop it.

[pointer]

No, you answered in mockery saying "black is white, too."

Mockery? What was I mocking, shiloh?

I said that the verse you provided did not support your definition of "flesh." You responded with "black is white too." It was mocking answer meant to belittle my response.

Please answer the question. What was there about your response to belittle?

I have answered your question.

Not at all.

It came across as belittlement because I said your answer did not support your definition of flesh.

That is not a reason. For the third time, what is there to belittle about that?

[Guest shiloh357]

No, you answered in mockery saying "black is white, too."

Mockery? What was I mocking, shiloh?

I said that the verse you provided did not support your definition of "flesh." You responded with "black is white too." It was mocking answer meant to belittle my response.

Please answer the question. What was there about your response to belittle?

I have answered your question.

Not at all.

It came across as belittlement because I said your answer did not support your definition of flesh.

That is not a reason. For the third time, what is there to belittle about that?

You tell me. You are the one who said that "black is white, too." Tell me how that was an adequate response to my point that the verse you cited did not prove your definition of "flesh

[pointer]

No, you answered in mockery saying "black is white, too."

Mockery? What was I mocking, shiloh?

I said that the verse you provided did not support your definition of "flesh." You responded with "black is white too." It was mocking answer meant to belittle my response.

Please answer the question. What was there about your response to belittle?

I have answered your question.

Not at all.

It came across as belittlement because I said your answer did not support your definition of flesh.

That is not a reason. For the third time, what is there to belittle about that?

You are the one who said that "black is white, too."

You are the one who said that there was mockery or belittlement. I take this third refusal to answer as admission that there was no just reason for this accusation.

[Guest shiloh357]

You are the one who said that there was mockery or belittlement. I take this third refusal to answer as admission that there was no just reason for this accusation.

I said it came across as mockery. Whether you mean it it that way or not, that is what came across in your response. Again, why did you feel it it was adequate? Or are you just trying to avoid having to answer the question?

[pointer]

You are the one who said that there was mockery or belittlement. I take this third refusal to answer as admission that there was no just reason for this accusation.

I said it came across as mockery.

Of course you did. That does not make it true.

Making a statement is one thing, shiloh; proving it is something quite different.