Anne

Hi I'm Anne from Northern Ireland,

Been a member of Worthy since 2004(I think) and okay I don't pop in here much, but really that

I do and struggle with it. The people at my old church didn't understand and were frustrated with me. I was a leader at one point but my illness got in the way of my attendance. I have attempted suicide. I am depressed. I have and continue to seek earthly medicine but am also trying to get my spiritual life straightened out.

Can anyone relate.

What was your illness?

nope i pretty sure i am for about 5 secs

Hi there,

I would like to ask you something about meaning of being submit to Husband. as There is some discussion that i have been talking with my husband about it so I need to be clear about this.

I told my perspective about being submit to Husband, work with husband as teamwork, and he said no it is not like he said it has to be control by husband and the wife have to do everything what he says.

I need your view of the concept of being submit to husband and the head of the house that the husband is supposed to love the wife just like Jesus love me. and he said that the husband (head of the house) is just being take care of everyone. I told him not that what the bible says i told him that the husband is supposed to love wife and be there for her etc. he disagreed with me. so I need the feedback what you think of "being submit to Husband" and being Head of the house

I am looking forward to hear what your feedbacks that will help me better understanding of this.

Thank you

DC

DC

I've read through the posts, i'm sorry to see than your problems continue, in respect of submitting to your husband......what are your thoughts on the matter?

always

LPT is last? Are you sure?

A bit late I know, Bro, but I hope you had a great birthday

I understood him just fine. And Jesus was fully man and fully God. So Joe was asking if "your Jesus" - the man - was evolved from "some beast" or did he "happen by dirt by water by chance." It's not that hard. If you believe in evolution, you must answer "yes" to these questions.

What a theologically awful way to frame a question. Yes, Christ's physical body was the product of evolutionary adaptations but that has nothing at all to do with his spirit or His divine nature which were so obviously a direct product of an intentional supernatural intervention. Just how much of that intervention was spiritual and how much was physical we don't know. You guys seem so anxious to jump on every tiny point of contention that you lose focus of even the most basic general concepts. I, for one, can't see how you're actually going to argue that the evolutionary history of the physical body of Christ in any way affects salvation from any biblical standpoint.

Lurker

i've read everything that's been posted, i dare say i'll probably reread after posting this, because i just can't see why we are trying to run circles around each other.

Do you want to discuss the creation of man, the existence of God, or are we just trying to prove we are smarter than the other?

whichever i'm listening and happy to talk

I'm open to discussing any of the above topics though at the moment in this thread I'm just trying to make sure that Christians aren't trying to attack evolution using lies about the life of Charles Darwin.

Lurker

Still listening IL, still willing to talk. However, i'm sure you understand, that I much prefer to stand in defence of Jesus.

There is still one thing you haven't covered in your presentation, if you scroll back i'm sure you'll see, however if you don't choose to look back, let me make it easy.... I asked you where the realm of human emotion was contained within evolution?

Anne

So far as I am aware "you tube" links are not allowed here. Due to the fact that there is a whole lot of misinformation on it.

*this is my opinion, not the official opinion of Worthy*

"the blood of Jesus Christ, His son, cleanseth us from all sin"

I'm not perfect, I don't pretend to be, but I know that I belong to God and He is mine.

The thing I wanted to point out is, "from all sin" you were not saved from the sin you committed right before you asked for forgiveness, you were not saved from the sins you were committing at that moment you asked for forgiveness and you were not saved from the sins you will commit tomorrow.

You were saved from all sin.

Now,

don't be mistaking for scripture says "If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth."

Just my thought

Anne

hi stephen

welcome to worthy

rofl hey pear

what happened the last time

Evolution without application is useless

This simple mind fails to understand

why the kind of man, the whim of his heart

cannot be explained within a spark

There is oh so much more

to the heart that is behind

the greatest of our nations minds

So i fail to understand

if you've failed to grasped the verse afore

why you continually lean to this lie

Like I said before

I'm willing to listen

i'm happy to be ignored

Anne

Sorry guys

i've read everything that's been posted, i dare say i'll probably reread after posting this, because i just can't see why we are trying to run circles around each other.

Do you want to discuss the creation of man, the existence of God, or are we just trying to prove we are smarter than the other?

whichever i'm listening and happy to talk

I'm open to discussing any of the above topics though at the moment in this thread I'm just trying to make sure that Christians aren't trying to attack evolution using lies about the life of Charles Darwin.

Lurker

okay then where do we start?

A big hug to you too pear pass it on

So far we have

• Saddam Hussein
  
• the pope
  
• Obama
  
• Bush
  
• Hitler
  
• Bob Hope
  
• Wayne Gretzki
  
• The Iranian Dude
  
• The North Korean dude
  
• Abbas
  
• John Wayne
  
• Tiger Woods
  
• Mel Blanche
  
• and Homer Simpson
  

Perhaps the question is "Who is not the anti-christ?"

Prince Charles drinks tea and grows organic cucumbers. I think the opposition is going to be a bit stiffer than that

okay you settle down

Are we seriously considering prince charles as the antichrist? Perhaps so, perhaps he is not, but i think it is silly to speculate without more than hearsay

pfftt, i think not for there are still stoogies around

Darwin by the way he left College to hitch a ride as rich English Toff on a Sail Boat. All he did was read other peoples books (I believe a geologists book in particular) and observed nature as they stopped here and there. He didn't even properly tag and label his findings. He had to do most of that when he got home (remember he was away for five years). So who knows if his specimens are actually properly identified he wasn't an onthologist or had training in any other arm of biology.

You know this is probably ironic but Darwin was studying to be a minister when he left College to travel the world.

Apparently Darwins only scientific skills is that he was a butterfly collector when he was a boy. A wonderful English pass time of the rich during his day.

Your account of Darwin's education is atrocious. Let's try again.

"Darwin spent the summer of 1825 as an apprentice doctor, helping his father treat the poor of Shropshire, before going with Erasmus to the University of Edinburgh. He found lectures dull and surgery distressing, so neglected his medical studies. He learned taxidermy from John Edmonstone, a freed black slave. . .

"In Darwin

Hey lostman

Hey Joe, could not have said it better myself

"He that believeth on the Son of God hath the Witness in himself"

sorry

My upbringing was pretty similar, but I still love daddy

Though I do remember a time when I was not in fear of daddy, mummy or anyone for that matter..........my lack of fear, caused a lack of respect, and an increase in breaking of rules and boundaries, I guess you could say my lack of fear allowed a rebellious nature to evolve.