"Well, you named a few already. I spend a lot of time in the woods and there are predators in my area such as cougars and bears-and a rifle can be a burden if your hiking, especially if you have kids with you, a handgun is far less bulky and easier to control.
There are even a small group of hardcore hunters that use them to hunt.
They're great for shooting varmints on a ranch or farm if you don't feel like lugging a rifle with you. A .45 will eliminate a coyote just as fast as a 30-30.
And of course there's self defense."
4 out of 6 are for killing things. That is a creative way to start a fire I wouldn’t have thought of it.
Why is there often resistance when someone states that guns are meant to kill things? I am assuming that you don’t have an issue with killing things so why the scramble to claim guns are a multi tool? I am well aware that my Mossberg is good for shooting ducks and geese, maybe home defense, and I can use the slug barrel for deer but that’s about it. Although I suppose I have just learned to start a fire with it. And it also makes for a 12 pound club/paper weight.
"Believe it or not shooting handguns is a lot different then rifles, just because you can hit a target with a rifle doesn't mean you can with a handgun."
I am one of those people. I qualified on the M9 but it was ugly. That first round took some getting used to.