Ok i agree i may have used the wrong terms in the way i expressed my questioning. And yes i meant when jesus was created in the flesh. He was merely create as anything else on earth at the time. And thats what i mean, they denied him when he was right in front of them. He was there in the flesh and still they chose to not see him as he was. My point is, in many cases the argument is pointless due to people wanting ti find answers that line up with their own selfufiling ideals and logic. Not of what is doctrine. Maybe in generalising am am incorrect in my assumption of the argument been pointless. I do know many that also have been saved by the "proof" of the lords existence given in a theological proofing. But many just suck you into a further game of chess that they like to play. And i do also see and hear of many christians falling away as a cause of been sucked into that game of chess. Maybe not ALL the arguments used are not completely pointless, and yes i do agree in defending gods word. But when do we draw the line at it been futile in attempt? Why don't we just say it, and just pray for them as it says in the bible? Shouldn't we humble ourselves to these kinds of arguments? Give them the tools and then leave them ti make their own choices? Is the game of chess that they play, really worth playing back? Our logic in the end to many of them, will always be fallacy to many of them.