It's been an enlightening discussion. One turning point for me was years ago when I was listening to Dave Moore on the radio. He mentioned Lucy and some of the facts surrounding the discovery. I'd been lead to believe Darwinism was only rejected religious grounds. Realizing that there were indeed good reasons to at least doubt it as a missing link was a big turning point. It lead me to examine what I believed and I read books like Darwin's Black Box, Buried Alive, etc. And as you've shown here, the facts surrounding the origin of 60+ de novo genes, SRGAP2B/C/D and HAR1f genes puts a substantial burden of proof on the neo-darwinists. I've noticed there are a few recent peer reviewed articles challenging the Neo-Darwinism view. To appear there would have been unthinkable a few decades ago. Like you said it's a worldview, which is fine if people buy into it, I have no problem with them.
Thanks for your words of encouragement! From what I've seen here (and on the other forum) you're a very skilled debater!
Blessings!
-Dave