omega2xx

There are no transitional fossils. Evolutionists have named some out of necessity, to try and keep the lie alive. This is especially true in whale evolution. Especially since you can't explain, genetically of course, how a leg became a fin and a nose became a blowhole. If evolution was true, the great majority of fossils would be transitional. If it takes 5 steps, and that is verify conservative, for an "A" to become a "B", 80% of the fossils would be transitionals, You can't show 5 steps between pakicetus and whales.

If you think you can keep the law good enough to get to heaven, you are listening to Satan, not to God. Phil 1:6 - I am confident of this very thing, that He who began a good work in you will PERFECT it until the day of Christ Jesus 1 Pet 1:23 - For you have been born again not of seed which is perishable, but imperishable, that is the through living and abiding word of God. I Jn 5:13 - These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God that you may know that you have eternal life. Love, peace, joy

You are calling it how you were taught and what you were taught is wrong. I checked your list and you could not prove any of them. Some one who understood genetics could prove what they say or admit they can't.

Correct theology is to give Christians assurance of their salvation, which can' be lost.

It's true. Theology doesn't save. Trusting Jesus, and doing what He asks of you, is what you need to do. That is legalism and it will not save anyone. All one needs to do is make Jesus your Savior. Phil 1:6 - God started it and He will perfect it.

No it wouldn't. He does not even know the basic of proven Genetic truths, and neither do you. I am prepared for another snotty remark. I hope you make it better than your last one. Love, peace, joy

Why?

Using the ancient texts is irrelevant. He made his comments based on the KJ, which is a faulty translation in the places he used to determine the truth. That can't be done. Love, peace, joy

All I know is thdt his comments came from the KJ.

I have not said he or the others used an English translation for their work,. Geisler did not translate a Bible, he interpreted it. Our discussion has been about his interpretation coming from the KJ. He says yom in Genesis 1 does not have definite articles. More accurate translations say they do, and I have give you an example. Love, peace, joy