barnabas

My wife has been hurt by her mean and cruel husband of 9 years. she has toendure all the affairs and all the unfaithfulness. she initially shut her heart from me, then was becoming more and more cold and even hostile. now she is having affairs with several men for revenge. now is the time to hurt me. This is my wife's position. The fact is i met her and i was a virgin at 31 years of age. for 9 years of our marriage i have not even looked at another woman. now that we are seperated i hurt a lot. i am still single and it hurts. i finally realised 2 weeks ago why she was so mad. She used to say if i ever was unfaithful she would sleep with men for revenge. i alwys hurt when she said that but passed it off as a stupid thing to say and forgot about it, because in my mind if i am faithful, then i have nothing to worry about. The problem is i am guilty in her mind. i have 3 kids 4,6, and 8. if she repents i'll take her back. i just don't know how to play this game. how can i prove innocence? on the other hand my wife says she has done no wrong and has never sinned againgst me. all of her adultery is not adultery - it is all my fault and it is real love - not the love i gave her. it hurts

Weather manipulation research reaches a new height

Weather manipulation research reaches a new height

Weather manipulation research reaches a new height

http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?fuse...essay_id=231274 The Wilson Quarterly (adress listed) is another good source of information. If you really investigate the facts you may be surprised. Check out BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3370211.stm other sites include http://www.gci.org.uk/science.html http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/n.../geoengineering International Environmental Law in United States Courts,� Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, vol. 7, pp. 57-62 (1998). "May We Engineer the Climate," Climatic Change, vol. 33, pp. 309-21 (1996). ABSTRACT. Not only is the science of climate engineering uncertain; the legal issues are also highly uncertain. Although existing international law does not specifically limit the freedom of states to undertake climate engineering, the international community would likely demand a say in whether to proceed should climate engineering move from the realm of speculation to concrete proposals. The experience of other environmental regimes, however, suggests that developing an international decision-making mechanism would be difficult, and that the international community might opt for a simple prohibition on climate engineering on grounds of "precaution."

Wall Street Journal online April 25, 2007, 5:59 pm Could Global Warming Be Halted by Controlling the Weather? Frustrated with the limits of public policy to tackle global warming, some scientists say the time has come to engineer a way to control the weather. The idea might seem appealing, says a science scholar, but it could have potentially harmful ramifications. Climate engineering has become a popular topic among a group of scientists who are skeptical of the potential other environmental remedies, from carbon taxes to alternative energy, James R. Fleming, a professor of science, technology and society at Colby College, writes in the Wilson Quarterly

WALL STREET JOURNAL is there a more credible newspaper?

WALL STREET JOURNAL REPORTS -- 1997 NEWS BRIEF: "Malaysia to Battle Smog With Cyclones", by Chen May Yee, Staff Reporter of the Wall Street Journal, The Wall Street Journal, Thursday, November 13, 1997, page A19. "KULA LUMPUR -- Malaysia's war on smog is about to get a new twist. The government wants to create man-made cyclones to scrub away the haze that has plagued Malaysia since July. 'We will use special technology to create an artificial cyclone to clean the air', said Datuk Law Hieng Ding, minister for science, technology and the environment. The plan calls for the use of new Russian technology to create cyclones -- the giant storms also known as typhoons and hurricanes -- to cause torrential rains, washing the smoke out of the air. The Malaysian cabinet and the finance minister have approved the plan, Datuk Law said. A Malaysian company, BioCure Sdn. Bhd., will sign a memorandum of understanding soon with a government-owned Russian party to produce the cyclone. "Datuk Law declined to disclose the size of the cyclone to be generated, or the mechanism. 'The details I don't have', he said. He did say, though, that the cyclone generated would be 'quite strong'. Datuk Law also declined to disclose the price of creating the cyclone." This article is written by the prestigious Wall Street Journal, and it reports, very matter of factly, that Malaysia is ordering a cyclone just as someone might order some lawn furniture from a catalog! We also learned that the Russians have the capability of creating such a huge storm for a fee. Also unsaid, but inferred, is that this cyclone could be steered or controlled so that it would come close enough to Malaysia to clear away the haze that was bedeviling that nation, but not so close it would cause any damage. Further, the nations close to Malaysia are not quoted as being overly concerned that this most powerful of storms might accidentally hit their shores. This news is quite stupendous, and it opens up all sorts of questions about our incredible and unprecedented hurricanes in the past 5 years. Were these hurricanes also caused by our scientists, or by the Russian scientists? If our scientists created them, then the Federal Government needs to be strung up and quartered for the pain, anguish, and death caused by these terrible storms. If the Russian scientists caused these storms, then they have just committed an act of war against the United States! Then, the Wall Street Journal, on October 2, 1992, reported that a Russian company called "Elate Intelligent Technologies, Inc.," sells weather control equipment by using the advertising slogan, "Weather Made to Order". This motto is even on their business cards! The commercial Director of Elate, Igor Pirogoff, stated that "Elate is capable of fine-tuning the weather patterns over a 200 square mile area for as little as $200 U.S. per day". Is it just coincidence that this 200 square mile effective range is the same range as our new GWEN towers? We will be discussing what GWEN towers are and how they work. Suffice it to say that GWEN towers are apparently being used in conjunction with HAARP towers to shoot enormous bursts of energy into the atmosphere to control our weather. This Wall Street Journal article also quoted Mr. Pirogoff as saying that Hurricane Andrew could have been decreased "into a wimpy little squall". This statement is so shocking as to border on being ridiculous! Hurricane Andrew was so powerful that it caused several billion dollars worth of damage, killed a number of people, and destroyed or altered the lives of tens of thousands. Now, we learn that American scientists could have turned Andrew into a little harmless squall. But, I suppose the real question is this: did our scientists create Andrew in the first place? NEWS BRIEF: "United States and Other World Powers Should Outlaw Tampering With Weather for Use as War Weapon", Editorial by Senator Claiborne Pell, D-Rhode Island, The Providence Journal Bulletin, 1975. "The U.S. and other world powers should sign a treaty to outlaw the tampering with weather as an instrument of war. It may seem farfetched to think of using weather as a weapon -- but I'm convinced that the U.S. did, in fact, use rainmaking techniques as a weapon of war in Southeast Asia." Let us stop right here and now and digest just what Senator Claiborne Pell has told us. He said that the United States used Weather as a Weapon during the Vietnam War. We fought the Vietnam War from 1965-74 in a large capacity. Using Weather Weapons in the early 1970's would fit the time frame with which we are familiar. The U.N. treaty we discussed above was passed one year after this article appeared quoting Senator Pell. Now, let us hear some more from Senator Pell. "We need a treaty now to prevent such actions -- before the military leaders of the world start directing storms, manipulating climates, and inducing earthquakes against their enemies. The basic idea of environmental warfare is simple -- if a nation can learn to trigger natural events it can inflict terrible damage on an enemy through rainfall, flooding, tidal waves, earthquakes, and even climate changes that could devastate an enemy nation's agriculture." [ibid.] In one single paragraph, Senator Pell has confirmed our contention, above, that weather control is a reality and that it can be used as a weapon against an enemy. At this point, we need to clarify a very necessary ingredient required for a capability to be transformed into an effective weapon -- the capability needs to be exactly controlled so it will strike the target precisely. Otherwise, the capability is worthless; therefore, weather weaponry must be able to be precisely controlled! NEWS BRIEF: "Weather Modification As A Future Weapon: The Military May Have Added The Weather To Its Arsenal", by Louise A. Purrett, Science News, April 15, 1972, Vol. 101, page 255. "Both intentionally and by accident, man has discovered ways to alter the weather ... In 1968, Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a geophysicist who is now a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality [President Nixon], described possible military applications of weather modification in a chapter of the book, 'Unless Peace Comes'. " Louise Purrett then lists some of the devastating weather that can be produced: 1. Heavy precipitation -- Of course, heavy precipitation causes flooding, just exactly what we have been experiencing lately, in the most fertile and productive agricultural land in the world, i.e., the American Midwest. Our own Government is using this Weather Warfare on us! Why? They want to move us into the New World Order, and change our system of Government. As we have stated so many times in the past, they are planning a severe series of crises to so panic us that we will allow our freedoms to be taken away. 2. Drought -- Today, July, 1998, the South, especially Texas, is experiencing the kind of drought that devastates farmers, and drives them into bankruptcy. How many straight days of record heat does it take to turn fertile farmland into useless wasteland? Remember, no civilization can survive if it loses its ability to feed its people. Since this current group of leaders is New Agers who hate our Industrial Civilization, we should be very concerned about their ability to control weather! 3. Steer Hurricanes toward targeted shores -- We should never, ever have to worry about a hurricane hitting our shores again! But, they continue to do so, don't they? Keep this in mind for our next article, Part 3. 4. Warm or cool the entire world's temperature -- I think it is now very clear that our scientists are causing Global Warming. Of course, such Global Warming serves the purposes of causing enough panic to allow a Global Government to be established. See NEWS1198 for more details. 5. Punching a hole in the Ozone layer over an enemy nation. Isn't it interesting to note that this phenomenon is precisely what is being alleged by New Age leaders? What is their solution? To totally change our lifestyle. We will speak more to what they really mean by this in Part 3. 6. Alter the Ice Caps, possibly even bringing on a new Ice Age. Therefore we know that these technology can be used to bring on either a warming or a cooling of the entire world, depending upon what the leaders want to do. It seems apparent that they have decided to warm the world.

this film seeks to de-glorify Christ Jesus, and place Mary upon the cross as co-redemptrix (co-saviour) used this "vision" of Anne Catherine Emmerich concerning the totality of horrific sufferings our Dear Lord Jesus Christ suffered in his work to save mankind. Her book is The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ Jesus prays in Gethsemene Bible references: Mt 26:36-46; Mk 14:32-42; Lk 22:39-46 In the movie but not the Bible: Satan watches as Jesus prays (Jesus' prayers are drawn from the Psalms); Satan tempts Jesus, saying "Do you really believe one man can carry this burden? ...saving their souls is too costly;" Satan sends a snake to bite Jesus; Jesus crushes the snake's head in an allusion to Genesis 3:15. Source: Many movie details relating to Satan are drawn from Sister Anne Emmerich's visions, recorded in "The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ." In "The Dolorous Passion," Satan says to Jesus, "Takest thou even this sin upon thyself? Art thou willing to bear its penalty? Art thou prepared to satisfy for all these sins?" Emmerich also envisioned "the serpent ...This odious reptile of gigantic size" in Gethsemane. Other considerations: "The Dolorous Passion" spends much time on Gethsemane and draws many Adam-Christ/Eve-Mary parallels. The book also refers to the serpent later in the narrative, when Jesus is near death and is entrusting Mary to John's care. "It did not appear to me in the least surprising that Jesus should call the Blessed Virgin

SEAL TWO: The Red Horse And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword. the "Sword of Allah" represents the "Holy War to convert the infidel". This could be the great sword SEAL THREE: The Black Horse And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand. And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine. The dark ages SEAL FOUR: The Pale Horse And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hades followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth. Could be World war 1 could be the black death and crusades

Revelation Chapter 6 SEAL ONE: The White Horse And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer. THIS SEAL is about dominion, the false lordship of a counterfeit christ; it is about an ideology that appeals to the senses but which ensnares the heart. Instead of the liberty and freedom of the Spirit, we see here a bondage to Lucifer, the false "light of this world". This rider and horse, bright and shining, victorious, crowned with the laurel of the victor rides out confidently "to conquer". The Greek word used for "conquer" is NIKAO - this is about lordship. It means "to subdue, overcome, prevail, get the victory". It is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew BAAL, Lord! After being converted to Christianity, Constantine put to death his wife, his son, a nephew and his wife, and had Licinius (his coemperor) and his son strangled after promising them their lives. Constantine, who had his innocent wife accused of adultery and punished with death for the same, had a mistress of his own. Philostorgius, besides declaring Fausta to be innocent, also wrote how Constantine's mistress had given him the three sons who succeeded him: Constantine the younger, Constantius II, and Constans. Philostorgius refers to her as an adulteress. She too was murdered:

So we should be vigilant. We should examine teachings and leadership just like the Bereans to see if it is in accordance with God's Word. Some leaders preach that Jesus was born again in Hell. Some leaders say that we should have faith in our own faith because we are a little god. The film passion of the Christ has lucifer as a woman with a demonic child. Where is that in the scriptures? The film also has lucifer in the garden of Gethsemene , but where is that in the Bible? Do we just take everything in becuase it is labelled Christian? Do we believe all leadership because they claim miracles. Let us be wise as serpants and harmless as doves.

Beware! Apostasy means to fall away from the truth. Therefore, an apostate is someone who has once believed and then rejected the truth of God. Apostasy is a rebellion against God because it is a rebellion against truth. In the Old Testament God warned the Jewish people about their idolatry and their lack of trust in Him. In the New Testament the epistles warn us about not falling away from the truth. Apostasy is a very real and dangerous threat. And where else should we first look but in our own house for the Bible tells us that judgment will begin in the house of the Lord (1 Peter 4:17) # Primary Essentials (Nature and work of Christ) - Cannot deny and be Christian since they are explicitly stated as required in scripture. 1. Jesus is both God and man (John 1:1,14;8:24; Col. 2:9; 1 John 4:1-4). 2. Jesus rose from the dead physically (John 2:19-21). 3. Salvation is by grace through faith (Rom. 5:1; Eph. 2:8-9; Gal. 5:1-5). 4. The gospel is the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus (1 Cor. 15:1-4; Gal. 1:8-9). 5. There is only one God (Exodus 20:1-3; Isaiah 43:10; 44:6,8) # Secondary Essentials - (Nature of God) Cannot deny and be Christian. 1. God exists as a Trinity of persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. (See Trinity) 2. Virgin Birth of Jesus - relates to incarnation of Christ as God and man. 2 Thess. 2:3 1 tim 1:3 1 Tim 6 3 Let us be like the Bereans - not like ostriches. The Truth shall set you free

From the TOS: Disrespectful or threatening comments toward governmental institutions and/or world leaders will not be tolerated. (1 Pet. 2:13-17) We are to submit to authority. Yes We are to respect authority. Yes We are to pray for leadership. Definitely. Are we not to examine as well? Do not voters have the right to discuss and examine leadership? Do we blindly accept claims by those in authority?

BUSH USES PROFANITY ABOUT REPORTER 9/4/00 George W. Bush made a disparaging remark Monday about a reporter from The New York Times that was picked up by a live microphone. As Bush stood on the podium waiting for music to finish, he turned to running mate Dick Cheney and used an obscenity to describe reporter Adam Clymer in the nearby press area. Cheney agreed with Bush's assessment. Both men thought their remarks were off-mike. The Washington Post 'Civil Unions' Should Be an Issue for States, Bush Says By Jody Brown October 27, 2004 (AgapePress) - The president's recent remarks favoring "civil unions" -- which some conservatives say is just another name for homosexual "marriage" -- have worried some conservatives. But representatives from the other side of the political spectrum see the comments merely as a political ploy to attract voters on the eve of the election. In an interview aired by ABC on October 26, President Bush dropped a bit of a shocker on conservatives when he told Charles Gibson on "Good Morning America" that while he remains opposed to homosexual marriage and supports a constitutional amendment that would prevent courts from imposing same-sex marriage on unwilling electorates, he is not so strongly opposed to civil unions. "I don't think we should deny people rights to a civil union, a legal arrangement, if that's what a state chooses to do," the president stated. "tates ought to be able to have the right to pass ... laws that enable people to, you know, be able to have rights, like others." BUSH TO NBC: "IT'S SO SECRET, WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT IT." 2/8/04 WASHINGTON (AFP) - US President George W. Bush discussed Iraq, the November elections and the war on terrorism in an interview but laughingly stonewalled a question about his university secret society. "It's so secret, we can't talk about it," he told NBC television when asked about the fact that both he and the Democratic frontrunner, Senator John Kerry, are members of Yale University's Skull and Bones. NOTE: The Skull & Bones Society is an unGodly organization (a cult) of which Bush has never repented of being a member. John Kerry is also a member. check out http://www.cuttingedge.org/news_updates/nz1086.htm for information What do you think now?