dotcom

Hi MK202002. Yes, that's what I'm suggesting, a 3 1/2 year tribulation period. The interpretation of the "one week" in Daniel 9: 27 is the only place I know of in Scripture, that created (misinterpreted?) the 7 year scenario. Here are more Scriptures to support a 3 1/2 year view: But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. Revelation 11:2 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. Revelation 13:5 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth Revelation 11:3 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. Revelation 12:6 (3

Hi KatyAnn, Very interesting! You see, I was linking verse 27 to 24. 27and he shall confirm the covenent with many for ONE WEEK. That very much being potentially apart of the 70 WEEKS in verse 24Seventy WEEKS are determined...... Yes, Jesus said "it is finished" on the Cross........and I oh, so look foward to His return!

Hi KatyAnn, Thanks for the excellent Scripture references! I am prone to think that verse 25 in speaking of "Jacob's trouble", and the completion of that fulfillment will be immediately preceding Lord Jesus' return. And I agree with you, Jesus Messiah's fulfilled the "Sacrifice". Did Jesus stop the Temple Sacrifice because of that fulfillment? (during the Church Age) I don't think that is one in the same as the Abomination Desolation.

Hi KatyAnn, As I said, the return of Lord Jesus is yet to be fulfilled. Can we get back on topic?....Thanks!.....(Daniel 9: 24-27)....

Hi KatyAnn, I will refer back to Marnie's reply, of what Marnie described as the "law of dual fulfillment". Often times Bible prophecy applied to the day it was written, but also looked ahead to the future. These Scriptures that are quoted from Revelation may or may not have applied to Jerusalem's sacking in 70 AD. (I don't recall any 42 month scenarios in the Bible, in regard to this time period.) I believe the Book of Revelation of Jesus Christ is very explicite in speaking of endtime events, and the return of our LORD and Savior. (there is in abundance of unfulfilled prophecy there, including the return of Jesus!)

Hi jckduboise, Here are some Scriptures that point out the 3 1/2 years (42 months). In my humble opinion we're fast approaching that time, but not there yet. ******************************************************************************** **** But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. Revelation 11:2 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. Revelation 13:5 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth Revelation 11:3 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. Revelation 12:6 ******************************************************************************** ******

Hi Cymba22, Yes, that take is from the Book, "The Coming Prince" by Sir Robert Anderson (1841-1918) that established ALL future teaching. I'm just questioning if he was correct.......when the Scripture stands alone, there is no mention of King, "he" in verse 27 is to be interpreted, and "prince" in verse 26 is also to be interpreted. (not to be confused with "Messiah the Prince" in verse 25) I'm just wondering where it describes a false peace?? Help!

Can we take another look at Daniel 9: 24-27? More or less, the most popular teaching, from Sir Robert Anderson, explains that Satan is given the 70th Week. At the onset, antichrist signs an agreement with Israel, and midway, after 42 months, the Abomination Desolation occurs, then Israel heads for the hills, and all hell breaks loose as the Tribulation. What troubles me about this interpretation is that it just seems incomprehensible that God would give His Son, Jesus, 42 months on this earth for His Ministry, and then give Satan twice that long???? (and as stated clearly in Revelation, Satan is given 42 months, not 84 months) I am very concerned that if this popular teaching that has become so INGRAINED in our thinking, and if the Church is wrong in this teaching, what a mighty tool Satan has to deceive many. I am suggesting that Jesus has ownership of ALL of the 70th Week of Daniel. The first 42 months are Jesus

Thanks for all your service folks!! Back to Hal Lindsey........I recently thumbed through "The Late Great Planet Earth"........and was AMAZED to think it was written 30 yrs ago, because it so timely for today!! (Written pre-techno boom....about 8 channels on TV....no cell phones, no PC's, no microwave ovens, no debit card machines, NWO was not a lexicon, and the suggestion of the Euro would have sounded impossible!......) What made this book ring so true, is that Lindsey has studied prophecy! This man is something like 75 yrs old, has spent his life serving the Lord.......and by grace, overcoming an extreme attack right now. We don't have to agree with every word coming from any Bible Prophecy teacher....but let's not major in the minors. Let's hold in up in prayer....... Your friend in Christ, dotcom

Greetings, Although I should think it should be a very BIG story....you're all very right in saying this thing will probably "go away". Have you noticed how cozy the Clinton's and Bush's have become? Hillary for 8 years, then either Chelsea or one of the twins? We can have a dynasty!! Lord, Come Quickly!! Your friend in Christ, dotcom

nice post, katyann!!

Greetings Refuge, I appreciate your post that conspiracy theories has the potential of getting out of hand. I have offered information....and I ask questions. And I have congradulated those in our government willing to route out information. And I've kept any possible "theories" to myself.........as there is just not enough info to draw any conclusions. I am hopeful you don't think it's so out of line to discuss Gorelick, or Berger and their actions....as these people bare-out some puzzle pieces of truth on Able Danger. Able Danger may well turn out to be bigger than Watergate when it's said and done. Your friend in Christ, dotcom

Greetings M45510gic, The only Truth I know is the Word of the Lord. Thousands of our citizens died during the destruction of the Twin Towers..... A declararation of War on the Infidel. I can speak of what little information is made available on Able Danger, the 9-11 Commission, and the awful terrorists attack. These are but a few pieces of the puzzle. Please enlighten me with information as to make a picture out of this puzzle. This would alay my speculation that people have done/are doing things in secret to their own end. (That's what a conspiracy theory is) Perhaps we can discuss these things now, to seek out the truth, and be thankful there are some in our government willing to press toward the truth of "what happened". If nothing else, is because we SHOULD care. Your friend in Christ, dotcom

Greetings Jacob, Thanks for bringing the subject of Able Danger to light. I too have been wondering why the Media finds non-news like Cindy Sheehan more important than real news such as Able Danger. Is this to keep our eyes off the real news? It brings more questions than answers... Would the documents that Sandy Burglar stuffed down his pants shed light on the 9-11 Commission? What went wrong with Intelligence on the terrorists? And who was the Burglar protecting? (Burglar's sentence was a $50,000 fine, and banned from classified documents for 3 years.......slap on the wrist, shall we say?......) Why was Jaime Gorelick on the 9-11 Commission? It doesn't take on rocket scientist to recognize the conflict of interest that she, herself was directly involved (during the Clinton Administration) TO SET UP THE BARRIERS SO THE FBI, CIA, MILITARY ET AL COULD NOT SHARE INFORMATION. Who else was she protecting, beside herself? During the hearings, she looked like the cat that just swallowed the canary...really pulling one over on us, do you suppose? The military destroyed many documents relating to Able Danger in the spring of 2000 or 2001. (I can't remember which) Who were they protecting? Rumsfeld spoke out yesterday that those involved in Able Danger were not permitted to testify in this investigation because of national security. Again, I wonder who he (they) are protecting? I am left with conspiracy theories......but glad there are a few that are willing to keep digging........ Your friend in Christ, dotcom

Greetings, The Lord never left Job during all his suffering. Job's relationship with the Lord GREW during his trials......afterwhich he said (to paraphrase)....."I once heard, but now I SEE"..... The Lord can turn devastating events for the GOOD in our lives. Can anyone say our nation doesn't deserve judgement?......collectively as a nation?...............our sins are great?..........most grieviously our betrayal of Israel?........Are these things true? I pray the Lord's people are drawn to Him........that through these crisis', HIS people recognize their dependence on Him.......repent and surrender their hearts to the care of LORD JESUS. Jesus told us to not let our hearts be troubled "when we see these things"..........but to comfort one another because JESUS IS COMING BACK SOON!! Take comfort, friends. YOur friend in Christ, dotcom