i would like to respond to what Hazard said. although the Bible does say that the earth was created in 6 days and is only 6000 years old, this is clearly not entirely acurate. there are two points to back this up, for a start scientific evidence proves that the man has been active in the world for much more than 6000 years. for a start the Egyptians had created a very successful civilisation for a good while by this point, not to mention all that happened before this, for example the dinosaurs. if the earth was only 6000 years old why have we found evidence of dinosaurs, and geological evidence that the earths age is to be measured in millions rather than thousands of years? why would God plant evidence to suggest this if it were not true? to decieve us? i do not believe my God is a deceitful God. he wants the whole world to know he exists, to trust in him, and so why would he convince the world of one thing when it is not true?
surely the true explanation is that man at the time had no understanding of the world and used this story to explain the world around them. if we are to believe that the earth is only 6000 years old and took six days to create, do you also believe there are a finite number of places in heaven as the bible suggests, and that this quota has already been filled? do you believe Abraham was over 900 years old? no, these are numbers that either represent large periods of time of which humans were unsure of and created a large sounding number in its place. in the case of Abraham and Noah, their ages refer to obviously a different system of numbers that has been confused in calculation.
to believe that the world is only 6000 years old is madness, God would not deceive us, and man could surely not know the extent of the earths age at the time the bible is written. how could they understand the word of God when they had so little understanding of the world. it is foolish not to update this knowledge, when we have the power to find more, to then rely on evidence that is thousands of years old and has been translated many, many times. therefore the sentence in the "beginning" is merely a way to explain the world when man had so little knowledge of the world around him. it was not the beginning of God, merely the beginning of God's understanding.
TPB