nebula Posted September 18, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.75 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.94 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Author Share Posted September 18, 2012 Yes...it is cheaper than what nasa can spend . Maybe nasa needs to buy one of those. Going back to this - One thing you need to consider is scale. Those craeors you see are a whole lot bigger than you think. Example: the large crater in the 2nd image, Plato, is 109 km (67.7 mi) wide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.03b9a592ab3fbf402fba028ca0d40a97.thumb.jpg.2258d605d3ad1f34b6effde23d20e7d7.jpg)
Recommended Posts