Jump to content


Royal Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

12,003 Excellent


About nebula

  • Rank
    Royal Member
  • Birthday 11/19/1970

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Central Maryland
  • Interests
    Worshipping God
    Learning how to love

Recent Profile Visitors

21,809 profile views
  1. If there is anyone here who is good at researching this sort of thing, this might be a good one to look into. Because if it is true, it's very, very bad. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - They lied: The UN Migration Pact IS legally binding and could be valid FOR ALL countries By LAURA CAT 15 December 2018 For months proponents of the UN Migration Pact told us that the pact was non-binding. The response to the many citizens of nation states worldwide having signed country specific petitions was that it was non-binding so there was nothing to worry about, it was going to be good. The immensely opposed and disastrous document declares unlimited migration to be treated as a human right, thereby deprecating the term ‘illegal migrants’, and criminalises any criticism of migration as hate speech. <snip> Now we know. In a frank exchange with Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Mr. Hebner of the AfD drew out an admission that it is, in fact, legally binding. As well, that it will be adopted as rule for all UN Member states once enacted. Mr. Hebner asks: “You can see for yourself clearly that during the conference, the spokesperson for Morocco emphasised that the agreement was legally binding. He said clearly, in a literal sense, that there is a corresponding legal bond for all nations taking part as well as an obligation of implementation. You and your delegation did not raise a single word of objection to that statement but idly accepted it. I would like to emphasise that the parliamentary motion was not presented at the conference. “ Read full report here
  2. I just happened to stumble upon a trailer for "God's Not Dead: A Light in Darkness." I was puzzled that this film had not been advertised and circulated like the first two movies were. Why is that? So I'm wondering, has anyone else here heard of it? If so, have you seen it? I thought it had the most meaningful message of the three. https://godsnotdead.pureflix.com/
  3. https://saraacarter.com/financial-bounty-hunters-testify-clinton-foundation-operated-as-foreign-agent/?fbclid=IwAR0f7DfJvnirMXB4Hd_rL0fU0MC14oHEZdZdg0SspF9NfcbZ1Z1_y81vcgw#.XBLhqAEGkFY.facebook
  4. nebula

    Not buying....

    Good. Bring some popcorn. https://www.c-span.org/video/?455872-1/house-oversight-subcommittee-hearing-clinton-foundation&fbclid=IwAR3VpcCu2T-gdIBYPVyYiojEqPCEQtSFAY9iO8SdDQW9q1eSBV9mEKAGhCI
  5. nebula

    Not buying....

    Just don't be like the guy on the roof refusing to get on the boat as the flood rises because he's "trusting God."
  6. Clinton Whistleblowers: Thursday’s Public Hearing to Reveal “Explosive” Information By Sara Carter December 12, 2018 | 3:31 PM EST Rep. Meadows believes info being delivered for Thursday's hearing to be 'explosive' in nature and may help connect the dots A trove of documents on the Clinton Foundation alleging possible pay for play and tax evasion have been turned over to the FBI and IRS by several investigative whistleblowers, who will be testifying in an open hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Thursday, according to the committee and lawmakers. https://saraacarter.com/clinton-whistleblowers-thursdays-public-hearing-to-reveal-explosive-information/
  7. nebula

    Q as in Question

    You and everyone else!
  8. Feds received whistleblower evidence in 2017 alleging Clinton Foundation wrongdoing BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 12/06/18 04:30 PM EST When a House subcommittee chairman bangs his gavel next week to convene an unprecedented investigative hearing into the Clinton Foundation, two questions will linger as preeminent: Is the Clinton family charity really the international do-gooder that earned a perfect four-star rating from Charity Navigator, or does it suffer from corruption and illegalities as conservatives allege? And if it is the latter, how much evidence of wrongdoing does the government possess? The answer to the first question is that the foundation and its projects reported collecting about $2.5 billion to help global crises, from AIDS to earthquakes, even as its own auditors, lawyers and employees privately warned of problems over the years. The answer to the second question may reside in 6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI. ... https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation
  9. nebula

    Q as in Question

    It sounds like the wheels of justice are spinning. Whistleblowers coming forward on Clinton Foundation
  10. nebula

    Atheist Flat-Earth Myth Debunked

    If the earth was flat, cats would have knocked everything off of it by now. 😁
  11. With all the evidence that the Temple was in "The City of David" section of Jerusalem, and that the "Temple Mount" was actually the Roman garrison, I'm surprised they are still clinging to the old belief of the Temple's location.
  12. nebula

    Not buying....

    Why do you believe this is a distraction from Christ? Is your job a distraction from following or seeking Christ? Is reading a newspaper of watching the news a distraction from following Christ? Is talking about and debating subjects on a Conspiracy Theory forum a distraction from seeking Christ? Is voting for someone "putting trust in man?" Have you seen what's been going on in Paris? And I don't mean the media watered-down version; I mean the personal videos on the Twitter feeds. After Macron came out in the open about Globalism, the French people finally realized the deception they've been under. The gas price hike was only the last straw in a growing pile of frustrations. Would you tell the French that their fight for freedom is merely a distraction?
  13. nebula

    Not buying....

    Here's another link to the video. Q - The Plan to Save the World
  14. nebula

    Not buying....

    OK, by "represent" I meant to depict or to portray. In any event, if your goal is to represent Christ, why are you investing yourself in this thread and the other one for the sole purpose of tearing down Pres. Trump and debunking Q? I also find it interesting how you have been lumping the two together, even though you don't believe Q is real.