OakWood Posted April 29, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 867 Topics Per Day: 0.24 Content Count: 7,331 Content Per Day: 2.00 Reputation: 2,860 Days Won: 31 Joined: 04/09/2014 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/28/1964 Share Posted April 29, 2015 Another fail here for the Evolutionists. Using accurate biological dating methods the ages of Adam and Eve are roughly Biblical, whereas using assumed methods they are much older, vary a lot according to the methods used and Adam and Eve didn't necessarily live at the same time. So it looks like accurate science claims that the first man and woman did live when the Bible tells us so but using methods assumed by links to apes and chimpanzees the dates are ten times older. The scientists using mutation rates based on what we know today rather than assumptions caused by evolution, are more consistent. In a nutshell - Adam and Eve are as old as the Bible says they are unless you are assuming things rather than using known facts. Who says that science and the Bible can't agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts