jimc2

If the six days of creation are thousands or millions then 1]How long are the days in those years 2]How long is the sabbath day of rest 3]How long is it from sabbath to sabbath 4]How long are the six working days 5]How long are the 40 days of Noah"s Flood 6]How long are the 3 days Jesus was buried - for He is not yet risen and our faith is in vain - jimc

and nowhere or no how does an all knowing all seeing God via His word/s scriptures state that the earth is the center of the universe or that all things in the universe revolve around the earth. yes He does,go see geocentrism at - jimc

Unless we take human sharks into consideration as some others - a good deduction and question if considered seriously like the monkeys coming down from the trees instead of humans taking to the trees for safety - jimc

Have you read the book/s,before making such bold statements - write to the authors and fault the book/s - jimc That is what the cited articles were trying to demonstrate not just trying to but have perhaps,hence the shuffling of feet and the rattling of sabres and the lighting of faggots - jimc

it is important to note here that Adam used a term of personal endearment wife,the term" this is my woman" as wife,near one or dear is still in use today.Also note the second Adam referred to the second Eve as woman"Woman behold thy son" etc and here he was not referring to Himself as son - more on this later - jimc

Blien -who said anything about fallen Angels mating with women of the earth.Fossils seem to indicate that everything was huge once but has progressively got smaller- this is known as entropy.Have you not noticed that we grow and grow and suddenly stop growing.So in a life span of 80years we stop growing say half way at 40.Adam and others lived hundreds of years - more later - jimc

You have really not accomplished anything other than to speculate about devolution. Don't understand the point about the layers EricH - Sorry about that but it seems one needs a creationist or evolutionist view to appreciate or reject what is proposed here - jimc

so what"s so smart about brilliant Priests - there were two of them that postulated a Big Bang that never was and there was another so accepted that was up to monkey hoax,fraud etc as I read it in Piltdown man and there was one who was regarded as brilliant by one half of Christianity but not by the other half so to speak etc,etc - jimc

dude, evolution and heliocentrism have nothing to do with each other. what is next for you, are you going to tell us the earth is flat? people in general tend to believe the wise men of the day,so it seems it was the wise men who got it wrong and spread it about that the world was flat.Nowhere or no how does an all knowing all seeing God via His word/s scriptures state that the earth is flat,in fact He clearly states it is round so how come you missed it - see science and geocentrism at (edited by mod to remove catholic apologetics site) - jimc

wrong about what? Oh, I see...Galileo Was Wrong is a detailed and comprehensive treatise that demonstrates from the scientific evidence that heliocentrism (the concept that the Earth rotates on its axis and revolves around the sun) is an unproven scientific theory; and that geocentrism (the view that the Earth is in the center of the universe and does not move by either rotation or revolution) is not only supported by the scientific evidence but is admitted to be a logical and viable cosmology by many of the world's top scientists, including Albert Einstein, Ernst Mach, Edwin Hubble, Fred Hoyle and many more. (from Amazon.com) Is this a joke? it is not April 1st yet. sounds more like doomsday for pseudo evolutionary scientists imho - jimc

When Adam named the animals,who were created on the same day as he was.there were only a few kinds,as they had not yet increased and multiplied.What intrigues me is were dinosaurs and primates in the queue - if they were then they coexisted in harmony with humans as herbivores as stated in the Bible.and humans then did not evolve from Primates. If,however,they were not in the queue,then humans existed before dinosaurs and Primates and monkeys probably devolved from humans.I have just sunk evolution and it is no good appealing to the geological column since it only exists in text books or to the sedimentary rocks for fossil proof. The update is the bottom layers are more recent than the top layers.So again the Bible is right again and how could it be otherwise - jimc

It nows seems the Church and Scriptures were right all along and indeed how could it have been otherwise.Type in "Galileo was Wrong" in search box and click or go direct to and click on books in L/H margin,also try www.kolbecenter.org and read reviews on both websites. (edited by mod to remove Catholic apologetic site)

Red jungle fowl: http://www.gbwf.org/pheasants/junglefowl_red.html Grey jungle fowl: http://www.gbwf.org/pheasants/junglefowl_sonnerat.html Then there's this I just found: What are Junglefowl? Junglefowl are the common ancestors of all chickens. It used to be believed that modern poultry came from only one species of Junglefowl, the Red Junglefowl, but modern science has proven that assumption to be incorrect. It has been proven through genetic testing that all four species (Green, Grey, Ceylon, and Red) of Junglefowl played a role in molding our modern poultry. The four types of Junglefowl share the same genus classification (Gallus) but are considered different species. http://castironranch.com/redjunglefowl.aspx There is no evolution in species or varieties[this is micro evolution and not contested]what is contested is macro evolution or kinds evolving into different kinds - jimc

so these six legged insects are no longer insects but have evolved into hopping mad humans called evolutionists - out of a total of about 25 known dating methods 20 state young earth whilst the other five have been incorrectly calibrated - jimc

We sometimes infer tone from the type of text people use. You are correct that science and the Bible can work together. If it is good science. The idea that these scriptures somehow prove evolution seems lost to me. I can not see anything of evolution in this.Maybe you could explain. Then you can answer me one question; If carbon-14 dating proves the earth to be no more than 30,000 years old, (10,000 to be truthful) how does any of the science you speak of disagree with the Bible? The other winged 4 legged creatures would be bats or perhaps extinct dinosaurs of the time. if any insect developed six legs from four legs it developed but did not evolve - jimc

the egg came first according to scientists,and so I ask how can so called pseudo science be compatible with Christianity -meanwhile see www.truthinscience.org.uk - jimc

Which came first and why? - jimc

Scripture does in fact tell us that man was created very good in God"s eyes.Very God in God"s eyes must be very,very,very good in human eyes.That we are not now very very very good is pretty obvious - jimc2

The way I tend to see it is as fragmentation. Adam would have carried in his makeup the best of what different humans now possess.There have been and are giants and it seems before the Fall everything was on a much larger scale and the tendency after the Fall has been backward and downward to entropy etc - jimc

This to me in reading what has gone before says that only man is called by God to be priests and answerable to God for guiding or not guiding and being held responsible for their flock straying.I have also read that man carries both male and female genes whilst woman only carries female genes.So man rightly represents not just man but humans. A woman would just represent women[female]-make of that what you will - jimc