I caught a little blurb on TV the other day and in it Obama was talking about making coal clean. Now, you have to understand that I live in Western Ky where EVERYTHING that Obama says about coal is a very important topic. My husband commented that he thought Obama was trying to get rid of coal and I informed him that, no, Obama did not say that exactly. He just said he would institute such high emmission taxes that it would bankrupt the industry if they didn't "clean up their act", persay. Sorry, too lame . Now, this led us into the actual point of this thread...
My husband's made the valid point that there isn't a very efficient way to clean up coal, that it is, in and of itself, "dirty" and will burn that way. Very true. Now that begs the question...
If the earth has a set number of natural resources, and if using them up more rapidly also kills the earth itself, had our rabbit race into technology and worldly dependance on power, etc, actually shortened our time on this earth. Have we, in moving so far away from the lifestyle that the people of the bible lived, actually sped up the "end times"? I mean, think about it...a lot of the signs of the end times are weather related things that we ourselves have caused by what we have done on this earth. I guess what I really want to know is, does anyone think that God would have allowed the earth to exist longer if we would have kept life simpler? Did we set this ball into motion with our hunger for technology and industrial advances?