Jump to content

Steve_S

Servant
  • Posts

    5,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Steve_S

  1. 2 hours ago, Teditis said:

    Your still wrong Pat, despite your length of words. AR simply does not designate a weapon as an ArmaLite weapon... it's for Army Regulated weapons.

    That's clear-cut in historical facts. It's a military designation... not a manufacturer designation. Learn your military SOP. ArmaLite did not

    rename the weapon after they improved it's design... they merely used the military's designator in further discussions.

    And again. I'm not going personal on you Pat... I simply don't have any feelings about your being wrong on this subject, I'm just passing time

    on the computer here. I just get irked a little bit at disinformation... like you're giving here. You try to pass yourself off as some sort of expert on

    guns... and you merely don't know as much as you think. See, I've dealt with AR-15 and M-16's first-hand... asked professionals questions about them.

    You have blogs off the internet... so much gossip, see? ArmaLite did not give the designator AR-15 to the weapon, the Gov't did. You see, it did not conform

    to Army rules and regulations until the Army deemed it so. This is all documented fact!!!

    So quit saying that I'm making it personal (attacks)… you always do that whenever someone disagrees with you. You slander people and should be reported for

    it all. (but I know that your Mod friends would just side with you because you're vociferous.) Quit slandering me when the document facts are all clear cut, please.

    In my opinion you're just trying to save face as the defacto Worthy gun expert regardless that documented facts fly in your face. You're not the only one who's

    handle weapons before... I'm secure in the knowledge that I have way more experience with guns than you'll ever have. They've been not only a part of my

    personal life, but my professional life as well. How do go against my professional knowledge of AR-15's with combat soldiers, where you have no such

    experience? See, I actually KNOW people that used them in combat situations… you again have internet blogs. Who do you think I'm going to trust given

    those two situations? You? HA! I give credit to where it's due... committed soldiers who used the AR-15 on the front-lines. They told me about it's inherent
    positive and negative aspects. So I have know doubts what-so-ever that you are simply misinformed.

    You're simply uninformed about the history of this weapon and that doesn't upset me... many people go through life devoid of understanding... it's a joke

    really that people have a platform to voice ignorance in a public forum like this, unchecked. But I guess that I need to get used to it.

    Removed form thread.

  2. On 10/15/2018 at 9:34 PM, Your closest friendnt said:

    We are not in a position to judge anyone who says I Believe...

    The flesh has and used to have it's own needs...

    The Devil likes your preaching...for a good reason...for a Satanic reason...he may deceive some who believe to convince to stop believing...on account of others critisism who demant a change that does not needed for redemption, ...

    The Devil takes the good and the bad who die withvthe denial and 

    Jesus takes everyone the good and the bad who die with the faith...

    ..

    Banned from thread.

  3. 2 hours ago, Blood Bought 1953 said:

     

    .....and what would that solid , “ Biblical “ instruction be? The same claptrap you were formerly famous for? In a nutshell, Jesus died for your sins until you sin again.That “Jesus will send you to Hell if you were not fortunate enough to have lucky, last minute repentance— any unrepentant sins left on your performance ledger that bad luck let you forget before you died.The TRUE GOSPEL in 1cor15:1-4 is a promise given by Jesus through Paul—- simply BELIEVE that Jesus died for your sins and that He rose from the dead and you will be saved.Add ANYTHING to the finished work of the Cross and you are “accursed”.You do not believe the Gospel and you refuse to believe Jesus died for your sins.Perilous ground.

    Removed from thread.

  4. On 4/16/2018 at 7:41 PM, Patrick Miron said:

    REALLY?

    Jesus Christ different have the same wounds?

    I'd be interested in discussing just WHY you abandoned Jesus Christ {the RCC and Orthodox Churches are the ONLY places you can find Jesus in Person} So you must have pretty good reason for doing so.

    Easter Blessings,

    Patrick 

     

    Removed from thread.

  5. 9 hours ago, 1sheep said:

    Dont presume I need to understand anything. . My opinion differs . I paid your father a compliment and you felt the need to share his downfall to a complete stranger and the entire world quite frankly!.  

    A thank you would have sufficed and certainly more appropriate. You backbit your own father.

    You don't get it. That's a shame. 

    Removed from thread for getting overly personal even after a warning from a moderator.

  6. On 10/10/2018 at 3:58 PM, frienduff thaylorde said:

    That only works on liberals my friend .    But be assured I am not political .    And the message it sends is ,   MARVEL NOT if the world hates you  .   Man we got to TOUGHEN UP .

    if words make us offended or fearful ,    WAIT TILL REAL PERSECUTION begins .     You know , the KIND that happens when you say REPENT and BELIEVE IN JESUS .

    OH ,   it is a stone of stumbling and rock of OFFENSE to those who reject .    AND if you were SO WORRIED about the forum ,  WHY DID YOU NOT RATHER private email one sheep  .

    WHY say it with hopes one will come along and REPORT IT .     YEAH .      YOU know WHY you said it .      You could have just spoken to one sheep in private .

    But no ,   you want one sheep banned . IF NOT ,   you would have told one sheep in private , NOT FOR ALL TO SEE .  

    Removed from thread.

  7. 10 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

    Just going off your own admittance that you are not actually making any disciples for Christ. 

    Yeah, and it is the same old statement that you can't save anyone.   No one is saying that you can or should save anyone.  So you can get off that hobby horse.  When you're not getting any results, none whatsoever, that might be an indication that a change is necessary. 

     

    Don't even try to put yourself in the same boat with those men.  They were pioneers and they went into  areas that had no exposure to the Gospel whatsoever and had to start with nothing.   You don't come close to sharing the stage with them. 

    It's not the number of converts at all.   But when there is no visible fruit, when there are no disciples being made, you can sit here and lecture us all day.  But it's like someone who is $100,000 in credit card debt trying to teach others about money management. 

    Perhaps you should tell the whole truth and not your edited version of the Gospel that leaves out a large portion of the truth about Hell, sin and repentance.

    Removed from thread.

  8. 22 hours ago, frienduff thaylorde said:

    Psst .   hey SIS  .  shhhhh,    its becoming quite plain badjoas evangelism came straight from men like warren and seeker friendly .    take a peep at another thread ,  you will see

    that UNCHURCHED word and more .     Shhh.      keep this our secrete .      OOOPS ,   I guess I forgot this can be seen by all.     

    Removing from thread.

  9. On 10/6/2018 at 3:54 PM, Cobalt1959 said:

    People have answered your questions here endlessly.  You are disingenuous and you have no credibility.  When you say something ill-advised you either avoid dealing with it, or claim you never said it, even when your own quotes are displayed to you.  Then you do as you are doing here.  Instead of actually dealing with what you yourself said, you try and turn the issue into something else.  You attempt to indict the people who challenge your false doctrine.

    You plainly stated that Jesus' gospel couldn't save anyone today.  That is the statement you now refuse to deal with.  The Gospel does not require baptism and it does not require this "Kingdom at hand" junk you keep dwelling on.  The reason you are sidetracking to those issues is because your impotent "gospel" ignores the consequences of rejecting the actual Gospel of Jesus.  You plainly display, over and over again that you have no concept of what the Gospel is.

    Removing from thread.

  10. 48 minutes ago, frienduff thaylorde said:

    YOU MIGHT wanna read corithians .     YOU worship the flesh pard .    I aint hearing JESUS  I am hearing JEW getting preached .  and ps ,   you aint of the tribe of Benjamin .

    and even if you were ,  what would it profit a man , LEST HE HAS CHRIST , due to the FLESH PROFITS NOTHING .

    YOU on a pedastool of grave danger .    But I hope what I said just kicked one leg of it out and as you fall from your great height , just remember , I done it cause I loved ya .

    WE NEED PREACH CHRIST .  and nothing else .  

    Banned from thread.

  11. 1 hour ago, 1sheep said:

    It is obvious you didnt really let what I posted SINK IN.

    Id be willing to bet you didnt even READ IT.

    You are kinda stiff necked. 

    It is you that needs to bring what you believe in alignment with GODS WORD! 

    What denomination are you? 

    Are you jewish?

     

    Banned from thread.

  12. 1 hour ago, jeremiah1five said:

    Wow. What name calling.

    Don't worry. I don't report Christians and hit the snitch-button. 

    I am not denominational. I am a Biblical Christian. 

    That's the ONLY kind of Christian in existence.

    If one's Christianity is not Biblical, then it is NOT Christianity.

    Bottom line.

    I am of Spanish-Mexican descent. There are clues that my mother's maiden name comes from a "Jewish" grotto/neighborhood in Spain. Remember, the children of Israel were scattered throughout the then known-world when they were exiled. Not everyone came back.

    Personally, I believe I am from the tribe of Benjamin.

    Covenant.

    And Biblical.

     

    Banned from thread.

  13. 15 hours ago, Oseas Ramos de Siqueira said:

    No, Retrobyter, you find not any errors in my interpretation, because there is not any error in my interpretation in Rev. 7:v.2.

    Having said this, whoever is completely wrong is you interpreting the Holy Scriptures by the letter, then you are spiritually dead like many similar to you. You can see that you are a mere materialist in interpreting the Scriptures.

    Removed from thread.

×
×
  • Create New...