Anonymous Aristotle

There was a news report I heard yesterday that reported over 5 million illegals were found to have voted during the election that seated BH Obama. Current policies president Trump is pursuing with Ukraine make it difficult to argue Putin and his bunch are in league with Trump. Or were before the election. On the other hand, unlike Donald Trump who's never met Putin, the Clinton's have known him for years. If Russia interfered at all it is more reasonable to presume it was to insure HR Clinton's election. Because her ethics are more inclined to side with Russia and other countries that would buy her influence based on her track record of selling out America prior to the election.

Oh, good! More money for that program that checks the rectal temperature of Grizzly in Alaska.

Good for the court. People have a right to know these things.Maybe some mother contemplating abortion will re-think her choice learning how "tissues" are handled after the procedure and by PP.

God be with the officer and their family. A 12 inch knife in presumably check-on baggage? How is it those bags aren't x-rayed before loading aboard a plane in the belly storage compartment? Imagine an explosive loaded on a full commercial airliner.

You mean they won't have to pass it in order to find out what's in it? As long as Obamacare is repealed with a workable plan I think many American's would agree they can be patient till that day comes.

It is about time. Long overdue in fact. Prayerfully this measure does pass into law. There are some countries that in order to immigrate a person has to have a viable skill so they can start working. They don't get to enter and then live off other peoples hard work. That should have been the case in America for decades by now.

Very good news that a Republican took this seat.

Thank you for taking the time to explain.

I think Ms. Pelosi should pay this attention when members of her own party notice something. I agree and would like to see her step down and retire completely.

You pray for him, you love him. In the name of the precious savior he shares in his faith with you as a brother in Christ, and a son of God. And a member of the church of God in Christ. What is it then when you speak of him as you do in threads?

How does someone despise a person first, and respect what love is suppose to mean to them and be in their own life, and then say they love the person they first despise?

Thank you for your kind understanding and gracious acceptance of my contrition.

It is bad enough this thread has been derailed to assail Trump. Please don't derail further with irrelevant referrals to Bill Clinton or Bush 43. People opine about what transpired at the NATO gathering. That the PM wasn't offended puts an end to the judgment against president Trump from the standpoint of the PM.Who is the only one that actually is entitled to feel something about president Trump's encounter with him. Everyone else just shares an opinion that changes nothing about the long past reality. If "Jerk" is a classification for bad behavior, there isn't a president that I can recall that wouldn't qualify for the label. Might makes right is reflected in the entire old testament of the bible and as a Godly principle. The Gospel overcoming the world of sin where Satan rules, is the principle afforded in the idiomatic meaning itself. And it is absolutely reflected by example in the U.S military.

Praise God in that perhaps that will be the buffer that precludes the LGBTQS lobby , and what is already leanings of SPLC, in their efforts to call the bible hate speech as pertains to scripture concerning homosexuality. Yes, silence is deadly in this age for the church.

Amen! Well said.

My sincere apologies. I just looked at that thread and I was mistaken. It wasn't you that made the comment about not using the F word. I apologize again and accept what you've implied in this thread. That you do curse but not here because of the rules.

Sad isn't it? We are to love. Even our enemies. So why is it our president in the eyes of some Christians in this world is exempt from that commandment? "No one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God abides in us and his love is perfected in us." 1 John 4:12

I had to give it a shot. Obama is speeching around the world about Populism for the USA. And that's a philosophy that would destroy the USA if followed. I guess Obama's ill intentions for America isn't a concern. Trump hate takes priority?

Oh yes, and by the way, this thread is about Obama's speech. Not president Trump. Can we all get back to that please?

FRIDAY, MAY 26, 2017 Montenegro’s prime minister didn’t mind President Trump’s shove seen round the world Being president means that you can shove another world leader and they'll let you get away with it

Why would you be offended at what transpired between the PM and president Donald Trump when the Prime Minister wasn't offended? And he was there.

Just because that is how you read it doesn't mean that is what I did. I saw your remark here implying you'd use foul language but the rules prohibit it. When in the F word thread you claimed you'd left that kind of talk behind when you grew up. There's an inconsistency there. That's not a personal attack in the slightest. That is making the observation of a personal discrepancy on your part in being consistent when describing your ideology concerning foul language. That's your opinion and nothing more. Just as is the case with my own. That the party involved with president Trump, PM Markovic, was not offended is all that actually matters. How he saw it. What he felt about president Trump moving past him, is all that matters. You're defending your right to opine that Trump was wrong. That's not surprising here. As anyone who's read your posts can attest. The only thing that matters at all is what transpired between the two men. President Trump and PM Markovic. And PM Markovic praised Donald Trump after this engagement. I bet that really burns The Resistance.

That isn't the image you put forth in the F word thread. PM Markovic wasn't offended, praised Trump, and stated what everyone who's ever seen the NATO summit photo knows. That the United States president is always in the front row. And you disrespect PM's own statement concerning how he actually felt about president Trump moving past him, by insisting in your own way that PM Markovic's isn't of a character wherein he would speak honestly about the incident. But would defer to being what you believe qualifies as a "true statesman"; someone who lies about being offended, and then lies when they later praise their offender. And you do all this to defend the offense you believe PM Markovic suffered from president Donald Trump. That's a special kind of reality you've got going there. You impugn the integrity and honesty of the PM, just to assail Trump's actions on his behalf. Contrary to what Markovic feels about the whole thing . And he was there! That's so cute. In a, man! How desperate is The Resistance? Oh! That desperate! Kind of way. Don't worry. Less than four years now and TR can let it all go and get back to working on being tolerant of a free democratic Constitutional Republic and its elections.

All of them! Hey, it's pizza. Just not with anchovies. Did you ever once see those old Jacques Cousteau programs? Did he ever once narrate saying, and here we have the magnificent school of stinky-fish anchovies, the brilliant swimming slivers of the sea? Noooooo.

It's in the perspective of the viewer of the event. We don't know what transpired before president Trump arrived. He could have been hanging back and someone informed him of what the Prime Minister later said. That the president of the USA is always in front. Perhaps a reasonable presumption in watching this news coverage or the video at YT is, look how president Trump deferred to all the other members. Because he was well back from the front of the group. And perhaps someone informed him, being this was his first photo shoot with the members, that he was to be in the foremost position for the shot. And so president Trump rushed to find his place. Besides that, the crowd was gathered. They were not lined up for the picture itself. They were in a bunch talking among themselves. Further, there is of course as we know in America a resistance faction that will never approve anything president Trump does. Ever. They can be understood as disruptor's, dividers, of a nation because they gather in a bunch under the umbrella term of The Resistance. Or, Never Trumpers. And that is much like those five year olds you mention in the behavior demonstrated by them is one of whining. "Wahhh! we don't like him!" And they take their toys and walk away. Then they turn and chuck them at Trump. And plan to for four long years. Imagine the size of their arms with all that exercise. And lastly, our opinions are just that. When the so called aggrieved party, the Prime Minister, was not offended at all, as he said in a statement when asked about this, that's what counts. What is ignored by those Resistance "five year olds", is that not only did the Prime Minister inform us he was not offended, but that president Trump was suppose to be at the front of the group in the picture, that says it all. Because the PM some are defending on his behalf of being offended, wasn't! In fact, the PM also in that same interview praised president Trump. That too is ignored by president Trump's detractors. Really, being the PM went on the record long ago when this was new news, it for everyone else is a non-issue. Always was. What we're witnessing now is, per your judgment, who are the real five year olds acting out about this.