Anonymous Aristotle

The great white shark in the great lakes is funny. In the latest fake news Anonymous Aristotle won the power ball lottery of over 400 million all to herself. It was delivered in cash by drone to her home. yeah, that is fake news. Drats.

Washington Supreme Court rules against florist in same-sex wedding case Last Updated Feb 16, 2017 (Sic)"...The court rejected several arguments put forth by Stutzman, including the assertion that since other florists were willing to serve the couple, no harm occurred. “As every other court to address the question has concluded, public accommodations laws do not simply guarantee access to goods or services. Instead, they serve a broader societal purpose: eradicating barriers to the equal treatment of all citizens in the commercial marketplace,” the court wrote. “Were we to carve out a patchwork of exceptions for ostensibly justified discrimination, that purpose would be fatally undermined.”"

Dear God, please help your sons and daughters in Eritrea. Amen.

Likely they've been raised on what has been called the Osteenification of Christianity. Very sad that these young people really don't know they're really not following the faith of God in Christ.

I'm not a fan but he must be doing something right. God bless.

I tried but I cannot look at those heartbreaking images. Thank God for this brave brave man, Dave Eubanks. Lord, keep him safe in your service. Amen.

From their lips to God's ears. Please let God's power and authority intercede in this matter. Amen.

Ah, yes, there is that.

‘Morning Joe’ Teases 7 A.M. Scarborough and Brzezinski Response to Trump’s Tweets BY: David Rutz June 30, 2017 6:20 am

Trump is good friends with the supposed aggrieved parties in this. I think there's a method behind it. We'll see.

Now if only this type investigation concerning collusion , meddling, slander, would turn toward the Democrats. Then they'd find people to prosecute for wrong doing.

This isn't really news. Many of us have known this since before he was sworn in. But at least there are numbers to back it up now. God protect our president from the evil that gleefully aligns against him. Amen.

And yet he's good friends with her and her fiancée. I believe there is a reason for this and they're all in on it.

Notice the timing wasn't to pursue this during Obama's term? I hope this fails. The obstructionist presence in Congress among the Liberals is obvious. But that there are some turn coat GOP's is concerning.

Excellent choice your honor!

Over a century of life lived. God bless him.

Yes, well, we'll just have to wait and see what SCOTUS decides.

Christians live their faith and live with their faith. However, this bakers religious moral objection wasn't demonstrated with consistency. He served homosexuals who were still an abomination to God due to their immoral sin, every day according to some. He had no problem at all making anything a homosexual customer wanted until they wanted a wedding cake. It is discrimination when he serves homosexuals but refuses to serve them a wedding cake.

It's a start.

I changed that first image link to the one that does work for people here and to the same image link as in the second posting. That way if someone see's that first post I made with the image link they can see the picture first thing and not have to find these other pages to do that. It's weird that some are getting such messages and no pic.

Yep.

Very strange because the link still works for me. No such error code found on my system.

I am not in error as to the definition and application of discrimination in this case. Furthermore, the baker isn't practicing his religion when he's a baker. He happens to be a baker who's religion is Christianity. Trick or Treaters are not a protected class of persons. The religious are. Homosexuals are. A number of persons are. He has a right not to offer a Halloween design cake. However, he cannot refuse to make a wedding cake for homosexual customers. And that is what he's doing here. Because unlike the Halloween cake, he couldn't even have a display of wedding cake styles that did not include something for homosexuals. Because there is no such thing as a homosexual wedding cake. There is only wedding cake styles offered by a baker in a bakery in their service to the secular public.

Where is discrimination permitted in the U.S Constitution? Would you link that article please?

I would say the SCOTUS will rule against the baker. If this baker was serving homosexuals before and regularly as you claim, then he has no religious discrimination argument, religious conviction argument, to refuse the wedding cake. Because he served homosexuals who are an abomination according to scriptures. Regularly, every day, as you claimed. Then he refused a wedding cake for them. Did you ever think the homosexuals who were being served regularly by this baker naturally thought he would have no issue with the cake order? If he served them regularly on other items for sale. But when a homosexual customer asked for a wedding cake the baker refused on religious grounds. The Bible says marriage is between one man and one woman. The new testament says Homosexuals will not see the kingdom of Heaven unless they repent. Sexual immorality is a sin. This baker served the sexually immoral that God condemned as an abomination on a regular daily basis. He had no religious moral objection to that being they were homosexual and buying something other than a wedding cake. But when they asked for a wedding cake, that is when he invoked his religious convictions and refused. His convictions were not consistent with scripture. He's going to lose this case. He has to. It isn't a first amendment case of free speech. It isn't a first amendment case of freedom of religion. 2007 St. Paul-Minneapolis Muslim Taxi Cab Drivers Refuse Service to People with Service Dogs and Alcohol