NConly

Where does Matt 4: 11-17 fit in your post ? thanks

I do not believe in the old law I am NC.

I agree these are good and about 20 more verses showing the same meaning. I am NC in case you are not sure.

Schumer should be saying this about someone else closer to him imo

I did like it however it is not what prefer. I am more of a Jack London, Louis L'Amour type

Stranger in a strange land was a very good sci-fi novel. I do not recall saying anyone has to change their beliefs I said I can not grasp How they believe it because in the several conversations I have had no one provided verses, I have not seen verses for both sides. I would like some one to show verses that say following only part of old law is ok mix old and new law is ok

There are a couple dozen verses that say the old law is done away with , not used , abolished. There are verses that state one must follow the whole law not a part they want to follow. And yet we have people saying they follow NC and the old law mixed. I can not grasp how people want to mix the old and new law when I see not one verse that says to mix them and not one verse that says pick the part of the old law you want to follow no need to follow whole law anymore. just saying

https://www.hli.org/resources/what-percentage-of-abortions-are-medically-necessary/Abortions performed to preserve the life or the health of the mother are so rare that they do not register statistically, according to Alan Guttmacher of Planned Parenthood, who did more to promote and spread abortion on demand throughout the world than any other individual. In 1967 he commented, “Today it is possible for almost any patient to be brought through pregnancy alive, unless she suffers from a fatal disease such as cancer or leukemia, and if so, abortion would be unlikely to prolong, much less save the life.” And more information at the link

what percentage would you say the above statement covers; 10% or closer to 90%

we were talking abortion get on subject.

people schedule visits to planned parent hood.

Texas needs to send a few bus's to Georgia.

All while politicians claim to be fighting hunger while not protecting farmers.

I would not say I am skeptical as you must think I am. Here is one subject I do not see being confusing to people but many are confused. I am of the opinion the Law was given to Israel period. The whole law was to be followed not parts of it. I do not see any verse saying Gentiles/Christians must follow the whole old law or part of the old law. Yet many mix old and new law. On the other hand you take the Rapture. There are roughly about 7-10 verses for each interpretation PreTrib, MidTrib, and PostTrib. So I see how someone could believe in any one of the three. Verses back all three. I as I said I do not see verses about the Old law still in use I see the opposite.

Tatoo's are a type of art. It comes in some very good art and some that is extremely liberal. One has to choose.

abortions are not emergencies

Now I realize that we may have some liberal Republicans that are guilty of these earmarks. In this video he only named Democrats as the pork barrel spenders.

Makes one wonder how so many core beliefs are different reading the same Bible? Some things we were not given enough information to fully understand and those differences are ok and not essential anyway.

Oh I see, sorry. Yes I am sure for men anyway ear rings have went in and out of fashion over the last several hundred years.

He does not have anything on his site about what he believes, it is odd he does not say

I am pretty sure I said two is ok. And one depends on the ear chosen

I went to his .org webpage he has nothing about what his beliefs are. Before I would listen to or follow even believe I would need to know what he believes in from the Bible. He reminds me of Benny Hinn

mental illness is where it belongs . And transition should be paid by the one who wants it not other employees or the public

Everyone in the group pays for what the insurance company decides it might spend, it is a shared cost across the board. kinda like paying county tax that goes to the school system those who have no kids have to pay to help the ones that have kids but get none of the advantages the husband gets.

if a person wants this it should not be covered by any insurance. Or a separate individual not group insurance.