Never Alone

It would be truly a wonderful amazing thing if somehow the hearts and minds of the Palestinian people would be turned to accept and love their Jewish neighbors, if they would be a loving and caring neighbor to Israel and a friend to the good people of Israel but what will it take ? 1994, the United States has provided more than $ 5.2 billion in aid to Palestinians In 2005, - All Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip were completely dismantled and all Israeli settlers and all of the Israeli army evacuated from inside the Gaza Strip and gave the Palestinians complete freedom to live in peace and to form their own government and to have free elections we must keep in mind that Hamas fairly won the Palestinian legislative elections in January 2006 the majority of Palestinians voted for Hamas the election campaign message of Hamas in 2006 was promise to fulfill the destruction of Israel and destroy the Jews Hamas won a landslide victory in Palestinian elections - the majority of Palestinians voted for a government that promised work in violence and military force to destroy Israel. From the moment Palestinian Children are able to speak and communicate, they begin training to fight and kill Jews. Here is a - third grade recital that Palestinian children in the third grade are taught to remember and repeat together. National Education and Socialization, Grade 3, Vol. 1, 2016–17, p. 15–16. Activity 1: We listen and repeat: Warrior, warrior, warrior, Oh my land, the land of the ancestors Warrior, warrior, warrior, I have climbed the mountains and fought the struggle I have conquered the impossible, and smashed the bonds With the wind's resolve and the weapon's fire And the determination of my people to fight the struggle Palestine is my revenge and the land of steadfastness By the oath under the flag By my land and people, and the fire of pain I will live as a warrior, I will remain a warrior, I will die as a warrior—until my country returns. The Palestinian children are given activities around these types of national poems that narrates to them that the concept of “return” [into Israel] should be achieved by blood spilling and self-sacrifice. The following poem, “The Land of the Generous” by Hamid Mahmoud, is printed under a picture of Jerusalem, East and West. We sing and remember: The Land of the Generous I vow I shall sacrifice my blood, to saturate the land of the generous And will eliminate the usurper from my country, and will annihilate the remnants of the foreigners. Our Beautiful Language, Grade 3, Vol. 2, 2016–17, p 64. Palestinian children are expected to become martyrs; in other words, to be killed in conflicts with defensive Israeli security forces. Palestinian children are taught that they are called - “The Martyr.” Getting killed in clashes becomes part of the curriculum. When Palestinian children reach Grade 4 they are taught Our Beautiful Language, Vol. 1, 2016–17, pp. 32–35. While Layla is dreaming about the return to Palestine/Israel, in the following poem by Ibrahim Ali, two young members of Fatah, the lion cub boy and the flower girl, are ready to attack. The accompanying illustration shows the two, in uniform, against the background of a blood-spilled path leading to Jerusalem. They commit themselves to conquer Haifa, Jaffa and Jerusalem. The fact is, Palestinian children spend their entire lives training and learning how to make bombs and rockets and weapons of terrorism - from the moment they are able to communicate and receive instructions, they are taught how to kidnap Jews and their training puts them directly on the battlefield and in the line of fire. The Hamas government is a military force of about 20,000 - 25,000 members in a Palestinian region of almost 5 MILLION Palestinians yet the Palestinians do not resist their violence in fact the Palestinian voted for the the Hamas government and many have assisted the Hamas government in continual attacks against Israel 5 MILLION Palestinians are unable to stop 25,000 militants - - this means that for every single 1 member of Hamas - there are 200 Palestinians who sit by allowing these 25,000 militants to use 5 MILLION Palestinians as human shields Please I Beg Of You Palestinian Friends - Let's Come Together And Make Israel A Friend

freaking join with me I am a partial Italian / Canaanite / - ☞ european, canaanite persian arabian / european join with me and defend Isreal because the Jews are deserving of self - defense and a homeland as a partial Italian, myself - - - ok ? - I'm just asking you to help me in uniting Italians as myself to support the Jews and their literal homeland and defending the people who want freedom and PEACE in the Middle East - without being hunted and hurt as - "" SUB - HUMAN "" - animals euro - pian / ara - bianian - - - - - - euro-pianian - Arabian / Europian I demend we come together and support Isreal - - - -today - - - ♡ NOW

freaking join with me I am a partial Italian / Canaanite / - ☞ european, canaanite persian arabian / european join with me and defend Isreal because the Jews are deserving of self - defense and a homeland as a partial Italian, myself - - - ok ? - I'm just asking you to help me in uniting Italians as myself to support the Jews and their literal homeland and defending the people who want freedom and PEACE in the Middle East - without being hunted and hurt as - "" SUB - HUMAN "" - animals euro - pian / ara - bianian - - - - - - euro-pianian - Arabian / Europian I demend we come together and support Isreal - - - -today - - - ♡ NOW

I believe Christ would have wanted each person whom he loves to know about why I believe Christ would demand that each person whom he loves - to know ☞ today know ✦ understand ✦ comprehend the reasoning and purpose of the Quran / Islam / Mohammud what is Mohammud pronouncing condemnation in claiming the Old Testament has been corrupted because the Old Testament still today ︸ today ︸ _ ✒ the Old Testament holds, values, promotes ♡ upholds and demands and ✣ ENVELOPES ✣ PREVERVES PRESERVATION of it's ANCIENT " self - same " continual teachings about - animal sacrifices, circumcision, idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, sabbath, the oneness of God.. ☞ today just as yesterday 〘 this all seems proven to be simply a personal grievance, offence and resentment for the racial personality and distain - 〙 violent - rejection 〘 - for the existence of the Hebrew people who have preserved their scriptures perfectly why do Muslims claim that the Old Testament is corrupt and that the Jews are the very, very worst and lowest and most horrible of all creatures upon the earth - nothing is lower that a jew who follows his failed and corrupted Bible. What law from the Quran have the Jews broken ?

. i think my main point was that how the entire condemnation of the Jews from an - Old Testament perspective - is centered around differences and matters that are very trivial ✒ inconsequential ✒ microscopic ✒ nonessential ✒ and so small in consequence. all of the basic principles regarding animal sacrifices, circumcision, idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, sabbath, the oneness of God, even the simple basic moral obligations of justice and morals, all these basic important principles in Islam that the Quran teaches ☞ the Jews themselves also believed perfectly. yes, the Quran goes off the rails and perverts and alters these things in a very perverted and distorted way but the Jews did not disagree and dispute with Mohammud about the things that the Quran considered essential for so - called righteous Muslims. The main disputes were centered around the person of Mohammud himself and regarding his importance and personal significance and role in propagating a message and faith system that he claims already was written and well known in the New and Old Testament. Mohammud claims that all of his teachings were confirmed in the Bible that existed in the very time in which he lived - the 7 th century. The Old Testament still today holds the same teachings about - animal sacrifices, circumcision, idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, sabbath, the oneness of God. for example, the knowledge and future coming of the Lord Jesus Christ is not mentioned or made known in the OId Testament, it is described in 1Pe 1: 10 - 12 - saying :10 Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: :11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of The ANOINTING / CHRIST which was IN them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of the anointing / Christ, and the glory that should follow. :12 Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Spirit Holy sent down from heaven....................... this is explaining that the prophets did not receive the revelation of the Lord Jesus Christ - Jesus Christ the son of God was never revealed to them ✒ ☞ revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us - - - - they ministered the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Spirit Holy sent down from heaven meaning in the Old Testament manuscripts ︸ Christ / The Anointing was IN these Old Testament prophets as they suffered as prophets who were filled with Christ in them- the spirit of God anointing them and ..... their very suffering that they endured for the sake of the Anointing / Christ in them signified and declared and testified the future suffering of Christ / The Anointing - the Son Of God - to come in the future. 〘 this was not revealed to them as knowledge and understanding they understood - 〙 this was kept secret, hidden from them, unknown,. meaning = they are a testimony that the Anointing / Christ was in them - but they did not testify of the Son Of God, whom was born in the last days - but testified in their suffering the same suffering that the Spirit of God would also come to suffer as the Anointing, Jesus Christ to come in the future. I just don't see the reasoning and purpose of the Quran / Islam / Mohammud pronouncing condemnation in claiming the Old Testament has been corrupted because the Old Testament still today ︸ holds the same teachings about - animal sacrifices, circumcision, idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, sabbath, the oneness of God.. 〘 this all seems proven to be simply a personal grievance, offence and resentment for the racial personality and existence of the Hebrew people who have preserved their scriptures perfectly - and Mohammud is envious and filled with jealousy, resentment and personal conflict with the ☞ Jewish race and ☞ the very existence of Jews calling themselves Jews, - existing as a people with scriptures and faith ↩ independently ☞ existence of Jews living in their homeland, of Jews having preserved scriptures ☞ existence of Jews not being dependent upon his revelations and prophecies and spiritual claims all of this resentment, hatred and jealousy and anger is transmitted and projected into contradiction and complete inconsistency to decry, condemn, denounce, censure, discredit and vilify the Old Testament manuscripts as corruption - when the evidence shows that the Old Testament still today holds these same exact teachings about ☞ animal sacrifices, circumcision, idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, sabbath, the oneness of God. Islam wants to be important and uplifted as the missing piece of the puzzle that replaces everything - when the Old Testament has not changed its core teaching - Islam is built completely on false claims and contradiction simply because personal feelings of resentment, hatred and jealousy, anger and racism are all that matters in the very core of Islam. ↩

. What was Mohammud's Dispute With The Jews Around Him ? ‘’ Mohammad claims that Islamic Torah and Gospels were already there with him at his time - Mohammad claims that Islamic Torah and Gospels were there with him confirming his very exact message. ‘’ Yet we see the Muslims of his day running around frantically, in a frenzied reverence just to go about scratching and etching upon stones, bark, wood, and animal skins, just to etch and scrawl something down that was already written in the Torah and Gospels. All they had to do was go to a village or a city just a few miles away and make a copy and translate the scriptures. Yet, Islam goes through this entire process - of "" Re - Processing "" all of this information through another spiritual entity called " Gee - briel “ an angel “ and Mohammud is making the claim that all of this information was already written down and with them in the very same exact land where they lived. in Torah and Gospels - as an already existing written book and an existing faith that was vindicating Islam MOAHMMAUD HAD THE TORAH AND GOSPELS WITH HIM - all around him in the very land where he lived and yet, his followers go around scrawling and scratching and etching on leaves, bark, wood and sticks, and rocks and skins, something that was already supposed to be in the same area where they lived. In The Torah and Gospels. How is this something revelatory or prophetic as "" revelations, "" to repeat stories and passages of a book that already supposedly already exists and is well known and spread to hundreds of thousands or people - just a few miles away from Mohammud's very doorstep ? Surah 94: “ So, (O prophet,) EVEN IF YOU ARE IN DOUBT about what We have sent down to you, ASK THOSE WHO READ THE BOOK (revealed) before you. Surely, truth has come to you from your Lord, so NEVER BE AMONG THOSE who are suspicious.” Here, the Quran is commanding people to believe in the Torah and Gospels and take these books as God's word and as truth, and to not be among those - who are suspicious….. Yet, all the Muslims had to do was simply take a short journey and walk to a nearby city or ask among the passing caravans for a copy of the scriptures, yet they don’t do that…. instead they use Mohammad to contact some unknown, unseen spiritual identity - to tell them what a book says that already exists all around them - just a few miles from their doorstep. Mohammad claims to be going about reciting the Torah and Gospels and throughout his whole life, Muslims are depicted as to clinging to every single last word Mohammud is repeatedly continually demanding ! - - LOOK - CHECK - look CONFIRM - in the Torah and Gospels - this is my very message - my message is the same exact message that is also confirmed in the Torah and Gospels. - HOW DOES THIS PROCESS MAKE SOMEONE A PROPHET - with revelation - he is not even claiming or demonstrating to be prophesying and foretelling and revealing something that is unknown and showing people something that is unknown and needs to be revealed...... Mohammud's claim and very words in the Quran continually repeat the same message saying that " my very Islamic message - my message, is the same exact message that is also confirmed in the Torah and Gospels. " Is this process truly confirming something as prophecy and revelation and truth by taking the contents from one book that is available for everyone and then translating and copying them into another language. ? In conclusion - - I ask Muslims one question what was it about the faith and belief system of the Jews where Mohammud lived that was in disobedience and against the core teachings of the Quran ? I submit that there is not a single piece of any evidence that demonstrates that the Jews where Mohammud lived were in conflict nor disagreement with the core teachings of the Quran. in fact the Jews did not reject Mohammud’s core basic message about God’s laws, the jews did not disagree with Mohammud about the oneness of God = the jews did not disagree with anything regarding the moral code of God and his laws about idols and sin and the commandments of God. so - what was Mohammud’s big problem with the jews ? what was Mohammud upset with the jews about concerning their faith ? the jews around Mohammud believed that God was one single God - the jews did not worship idols and other God’ s – in fact the jews around Mohammud - they rejected that jesus was the son of God, the jews accepted every single last commandment that Mohammud concluded about basic critical laws of God. Mohammud mentions nothing about moral or law disagreements that he had with the jews, the jews around Mohammud - are not shown to have disagreed with Mohammuds moral code - every single commandment and every single critical core and basic law and ordinance of God that Mohammud eventually decided - the jews obeyed and believed. Yet - Mohammud - demands that the jews are the worst creatures that have ever existed on the planet. Can Muslims can produce a single example of where the jews around Mohammud disobeyed the quran - or - a single example - where that the jews around Mohammud failed to accept the laws of God or failed to believe and accept in the moral code of every single last thing in the quran. Can Muslims produce a single example of where the jews around Mohammud disobeyed the quran the Jews did not disagree with Mohammed upon basic principles regarding idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, Sabbath, the oneness of God, the moral obligations of a faith. in Fact - The Jews held to even a much stricter law and teaching about not divorcing your wife for no just cause or reason the jews accepted every single last core and basic commandment that Mohammud concluded about basic core laws of God in the Quran. - Mohammud mentions nothing about moral or law disagreements that he had with the jews. The jews around Mohammud - are not shown to have disagreed with Mohammuds moral code - every single commandment and every single critical core and basic law and ordinance of God that Mohammud eventually decided - the jews obeyed and believed. Yet, Mohammud - demands that the jews are the worst creatures that have ever existed on the planet. Can Muslims can produce a single example of where the jews around Mohammud disobeyed the quran - or - a single example - where that the jews around Mohammud failed to accept the laws of God within the Quran or failed to believe and accept in the core principles of moral code of every single last thing in the quran. Can Muslims produce a single example of where the jews around Mohammud disobeyed the quran ? the Jews did not disagree with Mohammed upon basic principles regarding idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, Sabbath, the oneness of God, the moral obligations of a faith was Mohamud's dispute with the Jews - because the Jews did not buy and sell slaves and participate in the slave trade ? was Mohamud's dispute with the Jews - because the Jews did not capture women and enslave them and and have sexual intercourse with these slaves without a condition of mutual love and and full agreement of marriage ? was Mohamud's dispute with the Jews because - the Jews did not practice temporary short term " MUTTAH " marriages just for a few hours or days of sexual gratification ? was Mohamud's dispute with the Jews - because the Jews did not teach that divorce for any reason was justified in the eyes of God ? was Mohamud's dispute with the Jews - because the Jews did not beat their wives when their wives disobeyed their husbands sexual demands and ? Quran 4:34) for those women on whose part ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, (and last) beat them. Then, if they obey you, seek not a way against them. the Jews did not disagree with Mohammed upon basic principles regarding idols, adultery, murder, theft, the trinity, Sabbath, the oneness of God, the moral obligations of ones faith - but yet Mohammud demands that the Jews are considered the most horrible and worst of all creatures upon the earth.

The Hebrew word for ROCK is - צוּר - Tsûr The Hebrew word for STONE is - אֶבֶן - 'Eben the more modern Greek brakes this into a pattern of understanding that Petros " is a shifting, rolling, or insecure stone - smaller pieces of a huge enormous rock - little PIECES particles - pebbles of a small stone or small rock " Petros " is simply another word for - pieces of grit - small nugget or pieces of gravel or pellets PETRA is the revelation a massive direct full meaning of - - πέτρα - petra - the MASS / BODY (mass of) rock - not the Peter, Pebble, Gravel, Pieces - but the full petra - revelation that the full BODY of masssive complete bulk, volume of the ROCK upon which--- The Assembly Of God Is Built Upon .

. my Catholic and Islamic friendly distant servants of Allah - children also - of Spiritual Father Mohammud's prophecy, revelation and spiritual claims..... my precocious innocent Trinitarian friends - please join me in transmitting the facts

to . to friend - IgnatioDeLoyola If Jesus would had used sign language or even a picture diagram to express to Peter his message - the Greek manuscripts transmit this message to the reader that Peter was described as a small stone to build upon the revelation Peter received and this revelation is the ROCK upon which--- The Assembly Of God Is Built Upon . Peter perfectly understood the message of Jesus to write in Greek - 1Pe 1:1 :1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, :5 You also, AS LIVING STONES, - YOU ALSO - are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood There is NOT a single shred of any evidence that the Roman Catholic can provide to ALSO show that Jesus or his followers spoke Aramaic IN FACT when Rome crucified Jesus, Pontius Pilate had a literal sign made and the sign he wrote the words " JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS " Pilot wanted every single last Jew, Greek and Italian to read, know and understand that he had sentenced to death THE KING OF THE JEWS Pilot did not write this message in ARAMAIC, it would have been meaningless and a waste of time, Aramaic was not a common language among any significant number of people near Jesus - Hebrew was the language they all understood Joh 19:20 This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in HEBREW, AND GREEK, AND LATIN. All of the evidence demonstrates that Jesus and his followers spoke HEBREW and that GREEK was a language of the educated Jews, When Paul addressed the crowd of HEBREW people mixed among foreigners who were Greeks and Romans he spoke directly to address the Hebrews in the mixed crowd - " IN THE HEBREW TONGUE " (Acts 21:40) :40 And when he had given him licence, Paul stood on the stairs, and beckoned with the hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, HE SPAKE UNTO THEM IN THE HEBREW TONGUE .. in the book of Act 26:14 we hear JESUS speaking to PAUL out of the heavens. Paul said I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying " IN THE HEBREW TONGUE E ", --- JESUS FROM HEAVEN SPOKE IN HEBREW In fact Aramaic was not the spoken language of the day. From the ancient world we have over 215 different variety of thousands of coins from the first century period, during the time of Yahashua, of all of these thousands of coins { OVER 215 different varieties of coins " " { thousands of coins } " " we know that only a single 1 of those coins is inscribed with ARAMAIC - And only one side of this single coin that was found - is in Aramaic As if this one single coin inscribed in ARAMAIC was introduce as practical joke because the Jews did not commonly speak ARAMAIC nor did they commonly use ARAMAIC in their writings nor upon anything that held any significance for public consumption - there are thousands of coins inscribed with ARAMAIC from the region of Arabia, it is most likely that of the 215 variety of thousands of coins inscribed with Hebrew - this single 1 coin in ARAMAIC was brought into Israel from the region of Arabian. Jews would have no reason to make coins inscribed with ARAMAIC - they spoke Hebrew Every single time throughout History when the Jews are forced to convert their coinage and money system over to who has conquered and defeated them they always find that Hebrew was the only language inscribed on their coins. Just look at the website. http://www.josephus.org/coins.htm Aramaic was never dominantly spoken as a language in Israel and Aramaic has NEVER ADVANCED INTO MODERN WORLD because it never was a part of the modern world at any time through history . Aramaic can be used as nothing more but as a bridge language to aid in different middle eastern dialects to understand one another - nothing more. We have the huge amount of dead sea scrolls 40,000 scrolls and fragments in the dead sea scrolls from the first century period. Of the 40,000 scrolls and fragments in the dead sea scrolls - HOW MANY DO YOU THINK WERE IN THE ARAMAIC. ONE SINGLE SOLITARY SCROLL AND JUST A FEW SMALL TINY FRAGMENTS - the other 39,999 dead sea scrolls are in Hebrew THE ARAMIAC HOAX - has been the PAGAN CATHOLIC / ISLAMIC attempt by Muslims, Catholics and even uneducated Trinitarians and the surrounding pagan nations of Israel trying to hijack and pervert the Hebrew language.. instead of trusting in God who wrote the scriptures in Hebrew,,, they pretend that a slang mockery called Aramaic for Jews is how that the Manuscripts are to be RE - interpreted and interpolated..... No one speaks Aramaic today and expects to communicate with anyone but a clown act on Lysergic Acid Diethylamide or someone trying to imitate someone who has a speech impediment. A Catholic or a Muslim or a uninformed innocent blessed Trinitarian will forever try to prop up a pitch and chuck out language with a pitch and chuck out religious theology with pitch and chuck translations. In fact any Jew speaking to one another in the heart of Israel in Aramaic as a daily language would have been the unfortunate product of a very poor education.

the Dead Sea Scrolls for review, need to know - who I am, where I live, what I believe and subscribe to - whom's organization I am associated with and ultimately - what I will say after receiving a program to view portions of scrolls are there any other brothers and sisters who also simply believe to be better off - by not distributing personal identity to the government agency agents need excuses - - without an cause or reason / excuse - the agent discovering things from untoward, off-path sources,. - can compromise the agent, if needed, this compromise can be also an agent transformed into - Deputy Agent } temp still, either way /\ we are the bugs who need environment

after 25 years of trying to fully view the online materials for the Dead Sea Scrolls I have found that one must be financially invested and academically associated with a n organization for studying and paying money be EDUCATED about topical and subjects and parts of the - Dead Sea Scrolls as a project for reviewing parts ( EDUCATIONAL SUBJECTS ) as historical educational classes and studies and involved in an educational program or associated with an affiliated organization - in order to see, review and have access to a specific limited range of photos - / limited - of the Dead Sea Scrolls. I still have been unable to review , study and view all of the Dead Sea Scrolls without giving my Identity, personal address or taking classes and studies involved in educational program - or associated with an affiliated organization approved by the business holdings of the Dead Sea Scroll holdings

35 % - of the Hebrew contained in the Dead Sea Scrolls match exactly identical with the Masoretic text but only about ( 0.5 to 1 % ) - of the Dead Sea Scroll fragments found in Greek - show support todays version of the Greek Septuagint, the remaining other 55 % of the other Dead Sea Scroll materials do not match or confirm any protestant bible version nor any other manuscripts that have been found for our Protestant Bible Manuscripts Over half - " 55 % " - of all Dead Sea Scroll materials discovered between 1947 and 1956 do not support or match any other manuscripts nor match up to any translation anywhere. - for our Protestant Bible Manuscripts In the dead sea scrolls there were found aprox 203 verses in the Greek language - for the Old Testament, however, there are an approximate 23,145 total verses that are contained in the entire Hebrew Old Testament Here are the aprox 203 Greek passages found in the Dead Sea Scrolls for the Old Testament that could be attributed to the Greek Septuagint verse - found in the Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q119 - Greek Septuagint. Leviticus. Chapter 26: 2 – 3 - 6 – 9 – 14 4Q120 - Greek Septuagint. Leviticus 1: 11 _ 2: 3 - 4 - 7 _ 3: 4 - 7 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 13 - 14 _ 4: 3 - 4 - 6 - 8 - 10 - 11 - 18 - 19 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 30 _ 5: 6 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 _ 6: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 4Q121 - Greek Septuagint. Numbers 3: 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 50 _ 4: 1 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 – 16 4Q122 - Greek Septuagint. Deuteronomy 11: - 4 7Q1 - Greek Septuagint. Exodus 28: 4 - 5 - 6 – 7 8HevXIIgr - Septuagint Jonah 1: - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 Jonah 2: -1 - 2 - 3 - 5 - 6 Jonah 3: - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 Jonah 4: - 1 - 2 - 5 Micah 1: - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 Micah 2: - 7 - 8 Micah 3: - 5 - 6 Micah 4: - 3 - 4 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 Micah 5: - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 Nahum 1: - 13 Nahum 2 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 12 - 13 Nahum 3: - 3 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 Habakkuk 1: - 6 - 7 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 15 - 16 – 17 Habakkuk 2: - 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 Habakkuk 3: - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 Zephaniah 1: - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 Zephaniah 2: - 9 - 10 Zephaniah 3: - 7 Zechariah 1: - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 12 - 13 – 21 Zechariah 2: - 3 - 4 - 5 - 7 - 8 - 12 Zechariah 3: - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 Zechariah 8: - 19 - 20 - 21 - 23 Zechariah 9: - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 there are about ( 0.5 to 1 % ) - of the Dead Sea Scroll fragments found in Greek - within the Dead Sea Scrolls - for the Old Testament. Could it be that just because people were making Greek translations of the Old Testament does not necessary provide evidence or proof to support a completed Greek Septuagint - especially when less that 1 % of Greek manuscripts exist - today - to show what existed as Old Testament Greek translation before the Lord Jesus Christ. also the remaining 55 % of Dead Sea Scrolls are materials that exist - are either not supporting the Bible Translations we have today or they are Apocryphal writings or materials not related to the Bible The DEAD SEA SCROLLS - - are are a body of ancient manuscript material that confirm roughly - 35 - 50 % of all that is known and accepted today by Protestants as - the Bible. -as Masoretic texts this includes confirmation _ for about 0.5 to 1 % of the Greek Septuagint - itself, as it exists today this includes confirmation _ for about ( 35 % ) of the Masoretic manuscripts - itself, as it exists today Dead Sea Scrolls also contained 5 copies of Tobit, 3 manuscripts of the Wisdom of Jesus ben Sirah (Ecclesiasticus), 1 manuscript of the Epistle of Jeremiah (not actually written by Jeremiah). 1 manuscript of The book of Enoch is represented in 12 copies from Qumran, and 13 manuscripts of Jubilees The DEAD SEA SCROLLS are very important - its not that the Dead Sea Scrolls contradict or prove the Protestant Bible to be wrong it's simply just that around 50 - 55 % of the DEAD SEA SCROLLS are missing or do not contain what is contained as the Protestant Bible as a completed Bible, this is not a problem - the DEAD SEA SCROLLS artifacts discovered - simply have around 25 - 35 % of what is considered as the Protestant Bible. and they are in agreement this is - what we can see - and perceive and what can be proven from all that I have found.

Heb 4:15 ου - Not γαρ that - εχομεν we have - αρχιερεα a high priest - μη without - δυναμενον ability to - συμπαθησαι sumpathēs - eh'-o have compassion - ταις these - ασθενειαις weakness - ημων of our - πεπειρασμενον temptations - δε also - κατα upon - παντα all things - καθ as - ομοιοτητα similar - χωρις without - αμαρτιας sin NOT THAT WE HAVE A HIGH PRIEST WITHOUT ABILITY TO HAVE COMPASSION THESE WEAKNESSES OF OUR TEMPTATION ALSO UPON ALL THINGS AS SIMILAR, WITHOUT SIN Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. " as we are, yet " is in italics - anyone know why ?

I have enjoyed meeting and knowing Catholic people who do show outwardly that they are filed with joy and happiness, also I made friends with wonderful Catholics and along the way they shared their faith in friendly conversations and discussions. I learned many years ago that one of the important things that many Catholics believe is that Mary was born without sin as if she was conceived without an earthly father. Over the years this seemed more and more confusing to me when I read from the scriptures. We know that the Eternal Spirit, Holy of God the creator and father has no flesh neither is it possible for his holy spirit to have sinful nature or be tempted or commit sin. Angels whom are evil spirits they do commit sin and disobey God - but when we get to Jesus, does not the scriptures teach that Jesus did have the fleshly nature of sinful man and that Jesus was capable of committing sin but was without sin and was perfect in all his ways ? we see that Jesus Christ was conceived by of the Spirit, Holy of God but he was also conceived in the flesh of man - of the seed of man. Roman Catholic ideology teaches the doctrine that being born without a physical earthly father somehow makes someone created without sinful fleshly nature but both Adam and Eve were born without the sex act, born without a human father nor even an earthly mother - yet this Immaculate Creation of Adam and Eve - this did not help them or prevent them from committing sin. This did nothing for them even though they were not born nor created from a sexual act. Adam and Eve even lived at a time where purity was at its most powerful and potent form and they both existed as the very best potential and perfect example possible, purity was at the strongest and most powerful and purest form that has ever existed for human kind And still their decision and temptation and weakness to commit immoral acts, to sin, to defile their bodies and disobey God’s commandment was not prevented But when we read the sacred scriptures we see that - Heb 4:15 … For we have NOT an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. What was the natural physical nature of the flesh of Jesus ? - was he not created or made of the seed of David according to the flesh.. Jesus was created in the flesh to be tempted in all points, to be enticed and “ attracted “ to tempting situations involving sinful nature Was not Jesus made, conceived in the likeness of his mother, Mary … … as reproduction of sinful flesh, in the likeness of sinful flesh - in the likeness of Mary 2co 5: 21 for he hath MADE HIM TO BE SIN for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. if Jesus was sent to the world to be fashioned, created and made in the image and similarity and likeness of sinful flesh being born of the seed of sinful man - ,, for sake of our sin he was made - he died unto sin God sent his own son - in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, We see that scriptures say that Jesus was made / created inside Mary as the seed DNA and genetic hereditary of her ancestors going back to king David Heb 9:13 ............ the blood of Christ, who through the eternal spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God Jesus did not offer himself through his very own "" bodily nature "" unto God - but, through the eternal spirit in him - he offered himself …… Act 2:30 God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; Jesus explains, I must submit and give up my own desires my own nature and my fleshly temptations I must deny. i cannot do anything, whatsoever - of my own, - saying that it is the father only, that does the miracles and the works. saying - why do you call me " good " ? - - " there is no one good but God alone " Joh 5:30 i can of mine own self do nothing: as i hear, i judge: and my judgment is just; because i seek not mine own will, but the will of the father which hath sent me. i am not relying upon the power of my own qualities passed down from my mother - ! not relying upon the status of being born or created - without an earthly father, i have no power but to deny my own personal will and submit to the will of the spirit of God. Does the Bible teach that Jesus could never be justified in the flesh alone: - but only through the eternal spirit - he was offered as a “ perfect “ holy sacrifice without spot to God, only through the eternal and not by his flesh and blood and his own will which was made in the likeness of sinful flesh Joh 6:63 it is the spirit that quickeneth; - the flesh profiteth nothing: - the words that i speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. If Jesus was made in the likeness of sinful flesh In scriptures - he was tempted in the flesh, he had weakness, infirmities, trials, he had to discover and LEARN obedience, Jesus had to be taught to obey God and had to be trained and submit himself, deny his own will and surrender his own will - Jesus existed bodily in the form of sinful flesh of man, - passed down from his earthly father David and Mother Mary. Heb 5: explains :1 For every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins: :2 Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way; for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity. :3 And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins. :4 And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron. :5 So,, also, Christ glorified NOT himself - to be made an high priest; - - meaning = { in bodily form ) Christ glorified NOT himself - to be made an high priest The scriptures clearly make this point - Rom 1:3 … … his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh.. Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son - IN THE LIKENESS OF SINFUL FLESH, AND FOR SIN, - condemned sin in the flesh: God sent his own Son - IN THE LIKENESS OF SINFUL FLESH - in the likeness of Mary … … reproduction of sinful flesh, Jesus was sent to the world for the VERY, VERY PURPOSE to be fashioned, created and made in the image and similarity and likeness of sinful flesh the seed of sinful man - ,, for sake of our sin he was made - he died unto sin NOT TAKING AUTHORITY TO BE EQUALLY GOD. BUT HIMSELF, EMPTY / VOID MORPH OF A SERVANT, RECEIVING IN THE LIKENESS OF MANKIND, HE BECAME. Rom 1:3 … … his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Joh 7:42 Hath not the scripture said, That Christ cometh of the seed of David 2Ti 2:8 …Jesus Christ of the seed of David . Is this not the total and complete opposite of what Catholicism teaches about both Jesus and his mother ? Can any Catholic please clarify this ? why the scriptures clearly repeat the message that - Jesus was sent to the world for the VERY, VERY PURPOSE to be fashioned, created and made in the image and similarity and likeness of sinful flesh, with temptation and weakness of the flesh born as the seed of sinful man and that by being born of Mary this is exactly how and why this VERY PURPOSE WAS ACOMPLISHED ? God sent his own Son - IN THE LIKENESS OF SINFUL FLESH - in the likeness of Mary, by being conceived in Mary with temptation and weakness in the likeness of sinful flesh born unto sin and condemnation Jesus did not offer himself through his very own "" bodily nature "" unto God - but, through the eternal spirit that was his very own spirit did he - offered himself …… . ? would not his flesh and blood been of no value and meaningless unless it was offered through the eternal spirit that was his very own spirit of the eternal ? Joh 6:63 it is the spirit that quickeneth; - the flesh profiteth nothing: - the words that i speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. was it not a battle for Jesus to fight, resist and deny his sinful flesh, impulses and temptation, and submit his sinful flesh to obey the spirit within him ?

The concept of " the term - Limbo " was debated for about 700 years by Roman Catholics from the 12th century to the 19 th century. However the concept dealing with the fate of unbaptized babies has been debated since St Augustine in the 4th century. Here is why Catholics are guided to dispel and remove - the term - " LIMBO " before this can be discussed. they prefer - please do not use the word Limbo As for the afterlife, the fate and eternal destiny of unbaptized babies / a baby who was not baptized into Roman Catholicism, their fate after death has been something that The Catholic scholars for centuries have debated. According to church catechisms or teachings related to the 4th century, father St. Augustine is seen as attempting in his writings to answer this question.... Do babies who were not Roman Catholic - that haven not been sprinkled with holy water carry the original sin The Catholic scholars have asked - will these babies who die be accepted in heaven and will these innocent beings, be sent to eternal hell fire. Upon the Vatican Website https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html we can find the following material relating to " CATHOLIC LIMBO " this Vatican website states that - - St. Augustine's thought and theories and doctrines regarding the fate of unbaptized infants were brought up or revived in the 16th century ..... The Vatican website goes on to state that this was brought up by a 16th century Sect or group following " who followed a theory called Augustinianism along with a mixture of Jansenism faiths. The Vatican website explains that - Catholic theologians of the Augustinian school, { the Jansenists } , greatly opposed the theory of Limbo. and that then Paul III, Benedict XIV and also Clement XIII) defended and upheld the right of Catholics to teach Augustine's views theories and doctrines regarding babies dying under original sin who ( these babies ) are condemned and to punished with the eternal torment of the fire in hell BUT the baby would only suffer forever in eternity feeling a very, very mild pain, { not too hot..... for the baby whom was was not a Roman Catholic. The Vatican website also describes how that St. Augustine elaborated on the pain that the baby would feel as he detailed - comparing of the baby who was not Roman Catholic with the pain that was suffered by adults who were punished for their mortal sins. in conclusion - Pius VI pronounced that it is perfectly fine to teach that babies who died with the guilt of original sin are punished but only punishment of " complete lack of the Beatific Vision " called (“punishment of loss”), - but not sensible pains not - ( the punishment of "fire" ). Pius VI resolved this matter " In the bull “Auctorem Fidei” (1794) " the Pope condemned the teaching that places babies into hell fire and flames and pain who have not baptized and whose sins are ONLY the sin of " ORIGINAL SIN " Pius VI also called """ ‘ Limbo of Children "" was not the same punishment as the punishment of the condemned as - punishment of fire.... The website - goes on to clarify that the Vatican declines to label this as LIMBO ‘ Limbo of Children and explains that - Limbo, was the common Catholic teaching until the mid-20th century. The Vatican and Pope in essence - teaches that the term " LIMBO ‘ Limbo of Children "" is a term directly connected to a painful hell and eternal flame of hell for unbaptized babies and that although the unbaptized baby will die and go to a punishment, but the punishment was not the same punishment as the punishment of the condemned who will burn in eternal flames - punishment of fire.... The Vatican also promotes this teaching but also not until " IN THE 20 th CENTURY " the Church Authority has clarified only recently in the 19th and 20th centuries - saying that the eventual fate of the unbaptized innocent baby who is not catholic, their final destination / judgment day determination / judgment and eventual fate after purgatory will be based upon God's mercy. and this is not called Limbo any longer, - after nearly 2000 years of limbo confusion there still is unresolve for those babies who have minds incapable of understanding Jesus as if Jesus is incapable of redeeming and saving or even understanding the mind of a little child without first punishing the child for the adults failure to baptize the child in Catholic Tradition. the child's undeveloped mind is punished in death and this Catholic punishment will be the salvation to the child.