Search the Community

source: marriagedivorce.com/article.html TWO BASIC ETHICAL QUESTIONS ASKED BY CHRISTIANS In discussing the subject of divorce, Christians find themselves asking two important questions: 1. Is a Christian ever justified in seeking divorce? 2. Once divorced, may a Christian re-marry? In an attempt to answer these important questions, we submit the following: The Three Main Schools of thought amongst Christians on the subject of Divorce and ReMarriage are: Position 1 If one of the partners in the marriage bond is guilty of adultery then on the authority of Matthew 5:31,32 and Matthew 19:1-9, the innocent party has Scriptural grounds for divorce and subsequent remarriage. However, if the guilty party repents and seeks forgiveness, then forgiveness should be extended, and every endeavor should be made to re-build the marriage relationship. Position 2 If one of the partners in the marriage bond is repeatedly guilty of adultery, and seems to be unrepentant and not willing to change, then forgiveness should be granted but reconciliation is not expected. The innocent party, in this instance, has Scriptural grounds for divorce and remarriage on the authority of Matthew 5:31,32 and Matthew 19:1-9. We at High Calling Ministries NZ hold to the following position: Position 3 If one or both of the partners in the marriage bond are guilty of adultery, this does not give the innocent or guilty parties Scriptural grounds for divorce. Marriage is to be regarded as a binding life-long covenant, which can only be terminated by the death of one of the partners. Contrary to popular opinion, none of the following are Biblical grounds for divorce: * Adultery * Homosexuality * Fornication * Abuse * Unfaithfulness * Alcoholism * Desertion * Prostitution * Cruelty * Insanity * Sodomy Etc…………. The marriage vows made to each other before many witnesses, the minister and God, are binding and hold each other accountable for better for worse, till death do us part. Each partner in this marriage bond is to realize that, as opposed to being a contract which has escape clauses and penalty clauses; marriage is a sacred covenant which binds the couple together with an unbreakable vow made to God. The Exception Clause The references in Matthew 5:31,32 and Matthew 19:1-9, when read in the NIV Bible and many other versions, state that marital unfaithfulness is Biblical grounds for divorce. This is deduced from the clause in the King James and other older versions, where the wording read “except it be for fornication”. The NIV translators considered this to be equivalent to “marital unfaithfulness”, which is not an accurate translation of the original Greek text. The Greek word Porneia means fornication (i.e. pre-marital sexual relationships). The Biblical Hebrew Custom When culturally understood this phrase “except it be for fornication”, refers to the Hebrew custom of courtship/engagement before marriage and allows for breaking the “engagement” in the event of fornication (i.e. pre-marital sexual relationships). This is the position that Joseph and Mary found themselves in, as recorded in Matthew 1:18-20. Joseph was espoused (or engaged) to Mary and before they came together in marriage, she was found to be pregnant. Joseph thus contemplated exercising his legal rights to put his wife away by giving her a bill of divorcement. In the Hebrew customs, she was considered to be his wife during the time of the binding epousal period, even though they had not officially come together in the covenant of marriage. The exception clause is only found in Matthew’s gospel, as this was written primarily to Jewish believers, and is regarded as the Kingdom Gospel. Mark 10:10-12 and Luke 16:18 address the subject of divorce and re-marriage, but do not include the exception clause. The reason for this is that both Mark and Luke were written with more Gentile readership in mind than Matthew’s gospel. In the ancient Greek/Gentile and Modern Western cultures we do not adhere to the 9 to 12 month’s bind espousal period and thus, the gospels of Mark and Luke naturally omit the exception clause, as it is irrelevant. Further Biblical Explanation about Betrothal/Espousal Betrothal/Espousal -Divorce of a betrothed wife. Betrothal among the Jews in Biblical times took place nine to twelve months before marriage. The bride being in all respects bound as a wife, she could be freed only by death or divorce, under the same divorce laws as the married woman. During the espousal period of between nine to twelve months before the marriage proper took place, the woman who was betrothed or espoused was regarded as the man’s wife, and he as her husband, even though they had not sexually come together or made their marriage vows. Deuteronomy 22:23 (Sleeping with a betrothed/espoused damsel was regarded as with sleeping with another man’s wife). Matthew 1: 18-21 (Mary was only betrothed/espoused to Joseph when she was found pregnant. They were not properly married and thus, according to Hebrew custom he could put away his espoused wife by giving her a writing of divorcement. Death (not divorce) was the penalty for adultery in Old Testament times. Leviticus 20: 10 (A man committing adultery with another man’s wife must be put to death). Leviticus 18: 20 (Adultery defiles a man and makes him ritually unclean) Deuteronomy 22: 22 (A man and a woman committing adultery: both must die)