nebula Posted March 6, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.76 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.95 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Author Share Posted March 6, 2014 NYTimes ran an article on an investigation by a number of physicists as to the universe being a computer simulation...fascinating hypothesis. The concept has been around for a while. It does appear like we do live in an Electrical DIGITAL Simulation. There's a Finite end in Largeness and a Finite Limit in Smallness (10-33cm).....and it's digitized (quanta) not analog (Time is also Digitized). That is, if you take something and keep on cutting it in half.... once you cross that threshold the whatever "loses locality"..... That is, it's connected to everything else in the Universe. And it may be from this and other factors that the Universe could be a Hologram. Surprisingly, the Bible seems to speak to that in a sense in that we are just a shadow of a larger reality. Then to start to consider the Multi-Dimensionality...4 Knowable (3-Spatial + Time Dimension) and 6 Unknowable then it starts to come together a bit. Nachmanides in the 13th Century in his Genesis Commentary stated that there were 4 Knowable Dimensions and 6 Unknowable. Now wait just one minute LOL Then......"Shadow of a Larger Reality"; Scientific American; p. 57-63, June 2005. Relax Lurkers....Just thinking out loud and speculating but I find some of it compelling. Very difficult to put it together with so many unknowns Were there an Initial 10 Dimensions before the Fall.....again, pure speculation on my part....it's possible. Then all bets are off Times 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000------> concerning constants (they are already ) LOL It's funny, if I said the chair you're sitting in is empty space and you said I'm crazy, it's not....I would be more correct that it's empty by the ratio of 1 second to 30 million years LOL. Light LOL....Wave/Particle and in some experiments, can't recall off the top of my head, it appears that @ some points when you split it....each knows what the other one is doing...What In The WORLD!!!! And then it behaves differently when it's observed....What in The World!!!!! Yes Yes, off the Deep End I have a TON of Questions for the LORD So, the Matrix is real! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enoob57 Posted March 6, 2014 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 35 Topic Count: 100 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 41,180 Content Per Day: 7.98 Reputation: 21,454 Days Won: 76 Joined: 03/13/2010 Status: Offline Birthday: 07/27/1957 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Thinking the best of reality in the infinite place 'IS' In the beginning... as God in all His endlesswonder thought this is good, this is a good place to start. With His Word then inserted in thatbeginning of concepts of whatsoever He willed it was so... when I look at the things formed fromHis Word I realize what Jesus meant:For the rich who cannot see past their own provision-Matt 19:2626 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible;but with God all things are possible.KJVFor a father who cannot find hope past the power of disease-Mark 9:2323 Jesus said unto him, If thou canst believe, all things are possible tohim that believeth.KJVTo The Son Who was to have all sin put upon Himself to save His Beloved of God-Mark 14:3636 And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take awaythis cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt.KJVSo knowing the power in His Word as it is all that we actually do know and witness everyday in thethings that are here... this is the point of creation that we should not cling to the example butTo God Who 'IS' everlasting in the increase of continuance of whatsoever You Will Father...Love, Steven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 6, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 6, 2014 NYTimes ran an article on an investigation by a number of physicists as to the universe being a computer simulation...fascinating hypothesis. The concept has been around for a while. It does appear like we do live in an Electrical DIGITAL Simulation. There's a Finite end in Largeness and a Finite Limit in Smallness (10-33cm).....and it's digitized (quanta) not analog (Time is also Digitized). That is, if you take something and keep on cutting it in half.... once you cross that threshold the whatever "loses locality"..... That is, it's connected to everything else in the Universe. And it may be from this and other factors that the Universe could be a Hologram. Surprisingly, the Bible seems to speak to that in a sense in that we are just a shadow of a larger reality. Then to start to consider the Multi-Dimensionality...4 Knowable (3-Spatial + Time Dimension) and 6 Unknowable then it starts to come together a bit. Nachmanides in the 13th Century in his Genesis Commentary stated that there were 4 Knowable Dimensions and 6 Unknowable. Now wait just one minute LOL Then......"Shadow of a Larger Reality"; Scientific American; p. 57-63, June 2005. Relax Lurkers....Just thinking out loud and speculating but I find some of it compelling. Very difficult to put it together with so many unknowns Were there an Initial 10 Dimensions before the Fall.....again, pure speculation on my part....it's possible. Then all bets are off Times 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000------> concerning constants (they are already ) LOL It's funny, if I said the chair you're sitting in is empty space and you said I'm crazy, it's not....I would be more correct that it's empty by the ratio of 1 second to 30 million years LOL. Light LOL....Wave/Particle and in some experiments, can't recall off the top of my head, it appears that @ some points when you split it....each knows what the other one is doing...What In The WORLD!!!! And then it behaves differently when it's observed....What in The World!!!!! Yes Yes, off the Deep End I have a TON of Questions for the LORD So, the Matrix is real! Yes, Mr Anderson I Reckon So Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted March 6, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.76 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.95 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Author Share Posted March 6, 2014 Creation theology expressed in song: ~~~~ Stars From Illuminate, by David Crowder Band You should see the stars tonight How they shimmer shine so bright Against the black they look so white Coming down from such a height To reach me now, you reach me now You should see the moon in the flight Cutting 'cross the misty night Softly dancing in sunshine Reflections of this light Reach me now, you reach me now And how could such a thing Shine its light on me And make everything beautiful again And you should feel the sun in the spring Coming out after a rain Suddenly all is green Sunshine on everything I can feel it now, I feel you now And how could such a thing Shine its light on me And make everything beautiful And you should hear the angels sing All gathered round their King More beautiful than you could dream I've been quietly listening You can hear 'em now, I hear em now And how could such a king Shine His light on me And make everything beautiful And I wanna shine I wanna be light I wanna tell you it'll be all right And I wanna shine and I wanna fly Just to tell you now It'll be all right, it'll be all right It'll be all right. 'Cause I've got nothing of my own to give to you But this light that shines on me shines on you And makes everything beautiful, again. It'll be all right, it'll be all right. http://www.jango.com/music/David+Crowder+Band?l=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 No, self influence is not possible. Do you believe you would be a Christian if you had grown up in China? All Things Are Possible And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible. Mark 10:26-27 Many of China's churches are overflowing, as the number of Christians in the country multiplies. In the past, repression drove people to convert - is the cause now rampant capitalism? It is impossible to say how many Christians there are in China today, but no-one denies the numbers are exploding. The government says 25 million, 18 million Protestants and six million Catholics. Independent estimates all agree this is a vast underestimate. A conservative figure is 60 million. There are already more Chinese at church on a Sunday than in the whole of Europe. The new converts can be found from peasants in the remote rural villages to the sophisticated young middle class in the booming cities. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14838749 With God Is any thing too hard for the LORD? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son. Genesis 18:14 How many Christians are in China? The lack of credible statistics on how many Christians are in China today have led to estimate that vary widely. At one end, some Bible organizations claim that there are as many as 200 million Christians in China already, not without the hope of encouraging continued flow of support for their many programs for aiding the Christians in China. At the other end, the Chinese Communist Party most recently reported 18 million as the number of baptized Christians in China's Three Self churches in 2004. To conservatively estimate how many Christians are in China today, let's start with the 18 million figure (the number of baptized Three Self church Christians in 2004). http://www.billionbibles.org/china/how-many-christians-in-china.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheniy Posted March 12, 2014 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 223 Content Per Day: 0.06 Reputation: 27 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/07/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted March 12, 2014 I think this is one of the first threads I posted in when I joined this site last month, but my view of Genesis 1 was very limited. I spent most of my life seeing the first chapter of the bible as just an account of creation that must (MUST) be accepted as word-for-word-literal, so I never allowed myself to look deeper. I've since rejected the need to see it as such (not that I can't view it as literal, but it's no longer a necessity). I had recently stumbled onto the idea that the specific 7 day creation week was meant to parallel the 7 day jewish work week (which I posted here last month). Since then, seeing the different ideas of people here and really diving into the Word, Genesis has exploded with new meaning. Like a big bang. haha. My belief is that God is telling His people, "This is how I turned the darkness into a new dawning!" more so than "Look at what I can do in 24 hours!" Here is why. While the last interpretation may give you a sense of the bigness of God, it also makes Him seem, well, "out there", unapproachable. The first gives a sense of the nearness of God, like the gentle hands caressing an injured bird an healing its wings. Instead of God's magnificence being the "big power", His magnificence is being the healer, the deliverer, the restorer - like we see Jesus when He walked this earth. When darkness is surrounding me and my life is in chaos, I don't need the Great Cosmic Being who created a septillion stars and innumerably more planets in 24 hours, I need the God who is attached to my chaos, darkness, and void, and will bring me into His light, make order of the chaos, and bring new life out of the void. Knowing God for His power did not make the people fall in love with Him. In fact, they kept disrespecting His power time and time again (grumbling, complaining, disobeying). So what would be the most likely scenario of what was in His heart - another description of His power, or a description of His love, healing, and deliverance, traits that would more likely draw His people to love Him? In Genesis 1:2, the Spirit of God moved over the earth. This is the Strong's definition for the word "moved". The Spirit of God moved over the earth like an eagle broods over or cherishes her young. There was love and tenderness, not just creative power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolken Posted March 12, 2014 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 3 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 405 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 98 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/27/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted March 12, 2014 Sheniy - I had recently stumbled onto the idea that the specific 7 day creation week was meant to parallel the 7 day jewish work week (which I posted here last month). Since then, seeing the different ideas of people here and really diving into the Word, Genesis has exploded with new meaning. Like a big bang. haha. I love Chesterton's use of "sufficient delicacy" as it can relate to reading and understanding, and this certainly applies quite well to Genesis 1. It is interesting that Bible scholars too can view with different interpretations. Though one should be open minded when studying Gen. 1 ultimately we will arrive at our particular interpretation/perspective, or hopefully so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 12, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Sheniy - I had recently stumbled onto the idea that the specific 7 day creation week was meant to parallel the 7 day jewish work week (which I posted here last month). Since then, seeing the different ideas of people here and really diving into the Word, Genesis has exploded with new meaning. Like a big bang. haha. I love Chesterton's use of "sufficient delicacy" as it can relate to reading and understanding, and this certainly applies quite well to Genesis 1. It is interesting that Bible scholars too can view with different interpretations. Though one should be open minded when studying Gen. 1 ultimately we will arrive at our particular interpretation/perspective, or hopefully so. ============================================================================= Hey Tolken, Don't know who Chesterton is or any delicacies It is interesting that Bible scholars too can view with different interpretations. Well there is no 'Private" interpretation.... (2 Peter 1:20) "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation." And please don't say this only speaks to 'Prophecy". That is too say..."there are no Private interpretations of Prophecy but many of Scripture" There is only ONE TRUE interpretation of THE WORD....That's the PLAIN WORD OF GOD. "Bible Scholars" have "different Interpretations" for the same reasons that Joe Coffee and Betty Breadmaker have ..... they conjure and impose meaning to the text that's not there to conform to an "a priori" World View derived from Humanistic Thought and balanced to what "They Think" is right or "Just" or to conform to the latest "science" theory. Though one should be open minded when studying Gen. 1 ultimately we will arrive at our particular interpretation/perspective, or hopefully so. GOD is not the Author of Confusion. Your scenario above would result in what? Absolute confusion and relativism.....IMHO, I don't think that's what GOD had in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted March 12, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.76 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.95 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Author Share Posted March 12, 2014 I think this is one of the first threads I posted in when I joined this site last month, but my view of Genesis 1 was very limited. I spent most of my life seeing the first chapter of the bible as just an account of creation that must (MUST) be accepted as word-for-word-literal, so I never allowed myself to look deeper. I've since rejected the need to see it as such (not that I can't view it as literal, but it's no longer a necessity). I had recently stumbled onto the idea that the specific 7 day creation week was meant to parallel the 7 day jewish work week (which I posted here last month). Since then, seeing the different ideas of people here and really diving into the Word, Genesis has exploded with new meaning. Like a big bang. haha. <snip> In Genesis 1:2, the Spirit of God moved over the earth. This is the Strong's definition for the word "moved". The Spirit of God moved over the earth like an eagle broods over or cherishes her young. There was love and tenderness, not just creative power. Cool! I'm glad this thread has blessed you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolken Posted March 12, 2014 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 3 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 405 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 98 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/27/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted March 12, 2014 (edited) Enoch2021 - Don't know who Chesterton is or any delicacies GK Chesterton is a treasure and was a great influence on CS Lewis, Tolkein, among many others. The point being that one can read Genesis, or scripture in general, and gain a shallow but sufficient understanding or with "sufficient delicacy" (delicacy as in sensitivity of perception and discrimination) study the Word in greater depth and understanding. Enoch2021 - "Bible Scholars" have "different Interpretations" for the same reasons that Joe Coffee and Betty Breadmaker have ..... they conjure and impose meaning to the text that's not there to conform to an "a priori" World View derived from Humanistic Thought and balanced to what "They Think" is right or "Just" or to conform to the latest "science" theory. This is obviously not true at all, unless of course you are confessing to "conjuring and imposing" as well? Edited March 12, 2014 by Tolken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts