Jump to content

Enoch2021

Royal Member
  • Content count

    3,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Enoch2021 last won the day on September 19

Enoch2021 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,017 Excellent

4 Followers

About Enoch2021

  • Rank
    Royal Member
  • Birthday 12/26/1963

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Missouri
  • Interests
    The Word of GOD!
    Microbiology/Biochemistry
    /Physics/Genetics
    Young Earth Creationist

Recent Profile Visitors

1,863 profile views
  1. Question that needs answering

    I'm not derailing; he commented, he needs to SUPPORT those comments. It's just that simple. Thanks for your concern.
  2. Predictions

    The Earth doesn't Orbit the Sun. It's Stationary... Non-Spinning "Immovable": (1 Chronicles 16:30) "Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be NOT-MOVED." (Psalms 93:1) "The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it CANNOT BE MOVED." (Psalms 96:10) "Say among the heathen that the LORD reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall NOT BE MOVED: he shall judge the people righteously." (Joshua 10:12) "Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon." If it was the Earth that was moving, Why didn't Joshua say: "EARTH STAND STILL" ?? And it doesn't 'rotate' either: Not "Spinning": For the Coriolis Effect to Exist, you MUST HAVE (i.e., the "Necessary Conditions"): 1. Two differing Frames of Reference (One Rotating Coordinate System (Non-Inertial) --- The Earth and One Non-Rotating Coordinate System (Inertial)-- The Atmosphere ...and anything in it)... "CC.12 The Coriolis Effect: When set in motion, freely moving objects, including AIR [Atmosphere] and WATER masses [Clouds/Water Vapor], move in straight paths while the Earth continues to ROTATE INDEPENDENTLY. Because freely moving objects ARE NOT carried with the Earth as it Rotates, they are subject to an apparent deflection called the “Coriolis effect.” To an observer rotating with the Earth, freely moving objects that travel in a straight line appear to travel in a curved path on the Earth." Segar, Douglas A; Introduction to Ocean Sciences, 2nd Edition: Critical Concept Reminders -- CC.12 The Coriolis Effect (pp. 313, 314, 323, 324), ISBN: 978-0-393-92629-3, 2007. http://www.wwnorton.com/college/geo/oceansci/cc/cc12.html In other words, anything not "Tethered" to the Earth is 'Freely Moving'. 2. The Object in question not Physically Attached to the Rotating Coordinate System appears to deflect (i.e., Moves Independently of the Rotating Coordinate System) from the vantage point anywhere on the rotating coordinate system -- aka: the 'Coriolis Effect'. So, if the Coriolis Effect Exists (with Respect to the Earth), then a Flight from Charlotte North Carolina to LA (Non-Stop) traveling @ 500 mph (Air Speed) --- with both locations roughly 35th degree N Latitude, (i.e., both 'allegedly' spinning @ 860 mph ) should be ~ *1.5 hours!!* (But it's ~ *4.5 hrs!!*) Charlotte to LA Flight: Air Speed 500 mph. Ground Speed: 500 mph + 860 mph "Alleged" rotation speed = 1360 mph. So in my example: 1. Two differing Frames of Reference: (Earth and Atmosphere -- and everything in it) 2. The Plane in the Atmosphere is "Freely Moving" (not attached) to the Rotating Coordinate System and is flying in a straight path. In other words, Based on the Law of Non-Contradiction each (The Coriolis Effect and the Charlotte Flight at 1.5 hours) are either: Both TRUE or Both FALSE. The Flight is most assuredly FALSE!! In conclusion, the Earth is *NOT* "Spinning"; ERGO..."The Ball" goes by way of the DoDo Bird or you're a Stationary Ball Geo-Centrist. Voila. The only way the above can be refuted is if you're of the position that the Atmosphere 'spins' with the Earth. So then: 1. Please explain how the Coriolis Effect can EXIST when the NECESSARY CONDITIONS for it to EXIST are Two Differing Coordinate Systems (Reference Frames) -- One Rotating --"Earth" and One Non-Rotating-- the "Atmosphere" and everything in it...? 2. Show the Experiment where 'Gases'/Gas rotate in Lock-Step with a Rotating Solid Body just 5 cm above the surface, then provide the mechanism....? 3. Please explain "EAST/North/South" Surface Winds...? (Bonus Question: How you can have different wind speeds and directions simultaneously at differing elevations of the atmosphere while the atmosphere is collectively 'spinning' East, in Unison "The Same"...?) btw, These are Contradictory Statements: 1. The Atmosphere 'spins' in Lock-Step with the Earth. 2. The Existence of "EAST/North/South" Surface Winds. Which do you think is FALSE? MOREOVER, following the 'yarn'... Every Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere traveling horizontally from the equator to the center of rotationMUST HAVE differing Tangential Speeds; and every Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere rising in elevation from each respective horizontal Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere MUST HAVE differing Tangential Speeds (In fact, the higher the elevation... the faster they'll need to travel to keep up !!); and all of this rolling along at differing speeds... in Unison, EAST?? This is so far beyond Preposterous Ludicrousness Absurdity, 'evolution' (whatever that is??) and Multiverses... are BLUSHING!! AND, does anyone know how far up this 'Increasing Speed' Rope-A-Dope Fairytale Spinning Atmosphere ENDS?? I'd like to see that...it'll give a Whole New Meaning to Guillotine "WIND SHEAR"!! Goodness Gracious People. ps. Are the Gas Molecules attached to each other by: Velcro?? Glue?? Pixie Dust?? Other?? And where is the energy coming from for the continuous "Shot in the Arm" injections needed to keep each successive Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere higher elevation brethren in tow? Alice in Wonderland is more tenable than the "Spinning-Ball" religion. Sir Isaac Newton was a Free Mason (SEE: Lucifer Worshiper) and didn't believe in the 'gravitational' nonsense to begin with... In a letter to Dr. Richard Bentley on Feb. 25th, 1692, Isaac Newton says: "Tis inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact... “That gravity should be innate inherent and essential to matter so that one body can act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without mediation of anything else by and through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me SO GREAT AN ABSURDITY that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it." Scheurer, PB., Debrock, G: Newton's Scientific and Philosophical Legacy, 1988, p.52 The Pseudo-Scientific Community doesn't follow Newtonian 'gravity' anyways... "...Einstein created his GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY —which provides OUR MODERN UNDERSTANDING of gravity —with the express purpose of expunging nonlocality from physics. Isaac Newton's gravity acted at a distance, as if by magic, and general relativity snapped the wand in two by showing that the curvature of spacetime, and NOT AN INVISIBLE FORCE, gives rise to gravitational attraction." Musser George: How Einstein Revealed the Universe's Strange "Nonlocality"; Scientific American, November 2015. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-einstein-revealed-the-universe-s-strange-nonlocality/ And 'general relativity' was PUMMELED by 3rd Graders at recess before Quantum Mechanics chopped it's head clean off. There are No "Planets" just "Lights in the Sky". Please provide Scientific Evidence of what's causing the retrograde motion of 'planets' in the "Heliocentric" (aka: Sun Worshipping) Model... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...? b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...? c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...? d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? And 'models' are demonstrable Pseudo-Science... Please show "models" in the Scientific Method...? (and not "Ball-Stick" Airplane 'Models' Either !!! lol)...? "A model is used for situations when it is known that the hypothesis has a LIMITATION ON IT'S VALIDITY." https://www.thoughtco.com/hypothesis-model-theory-and-law-2699066 Allow me to translate: "Pseudo-Science"...There is no such animal as a Scientific Hypothesis with 'limited validity' it's tantamount to a woman being 'A LITTLE' PREGNANT !! REAL Scientific Hypotheses are either CONFIRMED or INVALIDATED, PERIOD...End of Story!! Furthermore, Scientific Hypotheses do not exist in PERPETUITY or wait for more DATA !!! 'Data' comes *FROM* Experiments - ( Hypothesis TESTS). A "Model" is conjured when the 'alleged' Hypothesis is UN-TESTABLE!!! That means, there never was an 'ACTUAL' Scientific Hypothesis to begin with !! They conjured a "Just-So" Story and passed it off as "science"; Crocheting is more Scientific !! Scientifically Validate... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...? b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...? c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...? d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? 1.) It is. 2.) Why? Here, take a shot at these... Flat: 1. "The salar de Uyuni in the Bolivian Andes is the largest salt flat on Earth, exhibiting LESS THAN 1 M OF VERTICAL RELIEF over an area of 9000 km2" ..."Longer wavelengths in the DEM [Digital Elevation Model] correlate well with mapped gravity, suggesting a connection between broad-scale salar topography and the geoid similar to that seen over the oceans." Borsa A. A., et al: Topography of the salar de Uyuni, Bolivia from kinematic GPS; Geophysical Journal International Volume 172, Issue 1, p. 31-40 http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/172/1/31.full This is a Geometrical Flat Plane. You can have a myriad of Topographical Features on a Sphere: Mountains, Ridges, Saddles, Spurs, Depressions, ect ect; Ya know what you CAN'T HAVE (??) ... "A Geometrical Flat Plane" And this one is over *"9000 km2"!!!!* Therefore, how can you Blindly Adhere to a Sphere that has one of it's Foundational Tenets "Vertical Drop" and yet at the SAME TIMEhave a FLAT PLANE with less than *1 METER VERTICAL DROP* over 9000 km2, pray tell?? ** The Entire Globe Charade is actually OVER right here. 2. Sea Sparrow (NATO): "Bistatic, semiactive seekers in the nose of a missile receive a reflected signal from a target that is being “illuminated” with an RF signal transmitted from a fire control radar on a stand-off platform (e.g., aircraft, ship). Such systems REQUIRE that the platform maintain LINE OF SIGHT (LOS) to the target until it is engaged by the missile. Ship-based standard missile (SM) and NATO Seasparrow AAW missiles are examples of such a semiactive mode." http://m.eet.com/media/1111959/819_radar3.pdf Range is MORE THAN 35 Miles ( http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/evolved-sea-sparrow-missile-essm/ ). The target is "Illuminated" with a 2 inch Pencil Beam (RF) which has to be maintained "Painted" on the target until detonation. At a more than generous 80 Feet Elevation above Sea LEVEL (Tracking Radar Height), the target should be hidden behind 385 Feet of Curvature. Please explain how you can have Line of Site (LOS) 35 Miles Away on a "Spinning-Ball" by showing how an 2" RF Pencil Beam can penetrate 385 Feet (117 METERS) of Target Hidden Height through a WALL OF WATER 24 MILES in Length...?? (ps. 35 miles is "Low Balling": (The 'Official' Max Effective Range is Classified ---- i.e. it's MUCH MUCH greater than 35 Miles!). 3. Flight: Since the Earth is, as we're TOLD, a Sphere 25,000 miles in circumference... radius 3959 miles, then Pilots traveling @ a typical cruising speed of 500 mph --- to simply maintain altitude, would constantly have to adjust their altitude downwards, (to Compensate for the Curvature) and descend 2,777 feet over half a mile every minute !!! 500 miles2 x 8 inches/12 inches = 166,666 Feet of curvature ---Total Drop needed in one hour to Maintain Altitude. 166,666 feet/60 minutes = 2777 feet per minute altitude descent to Maintain Altitude. A flippin Roller Coaster would be placid serenity(!!) in comparison. The nose of the plane on a typical flight would never get above horizontal, save for takeoff. 4. Vacuum of Space: 1. How do you have a GAS PRESSURE (Atmospheric Pressure) WITHOUT a Container...."TO BEGIN WITH" ?? When... "The "PRESSURE OF A GAS" is the force that the gas exerts on the WALLS OF IT'S CONTAINER". http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/180pressure.html Basically, explain how you can have a "Tire Pressure"... WITHOUT THE TIRE !!! 2. How can you have a Vacuum (Outer-Space) attached to a Non-Vacuum (Earth) WITHOUT a Physical Barrier in the same system simultaneously, without Bludgeoning to a Bloody Pulp... the Laws of Entropy (2LOT) ?? a. In other words, How are you still Breathing and adhering to the fairytale 'Narrative'... BOTH, at the same time?? b. Then, Define the Law of Non-Contradiction...? c. Then, please list each fairytale associated with "Outer-Space" that gets taken out back to the Woodshed and Bludgeoned Senseless as a result of the fairytale "Vacuum of Space" VAPORIZING....? 3. Have you ever heard: "Nature Abhors a Vacuum", by chance? Why is that...? If you can't provide Coherent/Substantive Falsifications of the 5 PROOFS (#5 is "Not Spinning" mentioned previously) above then your Spinning Globe Earth Position is UNTENABLE. It's just that simple. Capisce? It actually doesn't and lines up perfectly with Scripture. regards
  3. Question that needs answering

    Why'd they think that? What if the entire plane was encircled with ice beyond which it was too inhospitable to go? Well it was the Bible which told them it was Flat/Non-Spinning/Domed and Geocentric in the first place... Flat: (Isaiah 40:21-22) "Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth? {22} It is he that sitteth upon the CIRCLE of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:" (Proverbs 8:27-28) "When He established the heavens, I was there, When He inscribed a CIRCLE ON the face of the deep, When He made firm the skies above, When the springs of the deep became fixed, "Circle" = "chuwg" Strong's Hebrew Definition # 02329... 1) circle, circuit, compass. The Problem ... (Isaiah 22:18) "He will surely violently turn and toss thee like a BALL into a large country: there shalt thou die, and there the chariots of thy glory shall be the shame of thy lord's house." "Ball" = "Duwr" Strong's Hebrew # 01754... 1. Ball 2. Ball, Circle. If God, through Isaiah... wanted to tell you the Earth was a BALL "Sphere", he would have simply SAID SO... ("duwr"). And, how can you "Inscribe" a "Sphere" ON anything, pray tell?? "Face of the (whole) Earth" is used 35 Times in Scripture; can you show us the Face of a Sphere...? (Job 38:4-7) "Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. {5} Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? {6} Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; {7} When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" How can you "STRETCH THE LINE" on a " Curved " Foundation? The ISV just comes out and 'Plane-ly" says it... (Isaiah 40-22 ISV) "He's the one who sits above the disk of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers. He's the one who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to live in". Non-Spinning "Immovable": (1 Chronicles 16:30) "Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be NOT-MOVED." (Psalms 93:1) "The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it CANNOT BE MOVED." (Psalms 96:10) "Say among the heathen that the LORD reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall NOT BE MOVED: he shall judge the people righteously." (Joshua 10:12) "Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon." If it was the Earth that was moving, Why didn't Joshua say: "EARTH STAND STILL" ?? DOMED: (Genesis 1:6) "And God said, Let there be a FIRMAMENT in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters." (Genesis 1:7) "And God made the FIRMAMENT, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so." (Genesis 1:8) "And God called the FIRMAMENT Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day." (Genesis 1:14) " And God said, Let there be lights IN the FIRMAMENT of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:" Firmament = Strong's # 07549 // eyqr // raqiya` // raw-kee'-ah // from 07554 ; TWOT - 2217a; n m AV - firmament 17; 17 1) extended surface (solid), expanse, firmament 1a) expanse (flat as base, support) 1b) firmament (of vault of heaven supporting waters above) 1b1) considered by Hebrews as "solid" and supporting 'waters' above. Brown-Driver-Briggs: רָקִיעַ noun masculineGenesis 1:6 extended surface, (solid) expanse (as if beaten out; compare Job 37:18); — absolute ׳ר Ezekiel 1:22 +, construct ׳רְ Genesis 1:14 +; —ᵐ5 στερέωμα, ᵑ9 firmamentum, compare Syriac below √above; — 1 (flat) expanse (as if of ice, compare כְּעֵין הַקֶּרַח), as base, support (WklAltor. Forsch. iv. 347) Ezekiel 1:22,23,25(gloss ? compare Co Toy), Ezekiel 1:26 (supporting ׳י's throne). Hence (CoEzekiel 1:22) 2 the vault of heaven, or 'firmament,' regarded by Hebrews as solid, and supporting 'waters' above it. Dr. Michael S. Heiser (Renowned Bible Scholar)... "The issue is how “literal creationists” are actually only selective literalists (or, as I would call them, “inconsistent literalists”). If one was truly consistent in interpreting the creation description in Genesis 1 at face value (along with other creation descriptions in both testaments), you’d come out with a round, flat earth, complete with solid dome over the earth, and earth supported by pillars, with Sheol underneath, etc. But creationists who claim the literal mantel don’t do that, since the results are clearly non-scientific. My view, as readers know, is that we ought to simply let the text say what it says, and let it be what it is. It was God’s choice to prompt people living millennia ago to produce this thing we call the Bible, and so we dishonor it when we impose our own interpretive context on it. Our modern evangelical contexts are alien to the Bible. Frankly, any context other than the context in which the biblical writers were moved to write is foreign to the Bible. So, who’s the literalist now?" http://drmsh.com/interpreting-genesis-1-literalist/ How can you have "Pillars" and a "Cornerstone" on a Sphere? regards
  4. Spiritual Condition - Churches

    1. "Science" isn't an ENTITY or a RESULT, it's a Method: The Scientific Method. If you talk about "Science" in "church"?? Why would you? It's tantamount to bringing up Gasket Sealing at a Rib-Eye Conference. How does it go, someone's talking about how Christ is the Way, Truth, and the Life and you chime in with what is the Dependent Variable?? (I doubt that you even know what it means to begin with). It's Non-Sequitur... on Nuclear Steroids!! And forgive me but, What on Earth does this mean... 2. they hear "to believe the Bible about science" ?? To believe the Bible about science?? The Bible doesn't speak to The Scientific Method ("Science"). However, it does speak directly to Pseudo-Science... (Timothy 6:20) O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called. Is that what you're talking about? (most assuredly Rhetorical) 3. The Flat/Non-Spinning/Domed Geocentric Earth (or the 'Spinning-Ball' religion) isn't "Science" to begin with. To know with absolute certainty that HE Created a Flat/Non-Spinning/Domed Geocentric Earth is to just take God at His Word. Would you like ~65 Examples?? As for the OP specifically, I live Smack Dab in the middle of what is called "The Bible Belt" (Central Missoura). I have been in and out of at least 50 "churches" in the past 10 years. They are literally infested with the Paradox (brought to you by the serpent): 1. Take God at His Word, OR... 2. Believe the Nonsensical Buffoonery from the Pseudo-Sciences -- ( astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, paleontology, geology, anthropology, archaeology, evolutionary biology (lol), theoretical physics.) ...That's Pontificated from Rooftops, over and over and over and over and over again. Both can't be True. Ya see, the majority of people know with absolute certainty that there is "A CREATOR" because they can 'Fog a Mirror' (and God has shown them: See: Romans Chapter 1). HOWEVER, Indoctrination (no matter how moronic ) from Diapers is an EXTREMELY Powerful influence and tactic...most can't break-away. So many "Mind Numbingly" attempt to reconcile The Word of God with "Science" (aka: Pseudo-Science) which breeds utter chaos and discord!! It'd be easier reconciling Married Bachelors. 99.99999999999% of the Problem is Right Here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^. Let's Reason Together, shall we?? God has already warned and told you that satan is the most beautiful and WISEST of all his Creations. Moreover, God has given you satan's Two Common Tactics... 1. Create Doubt ("Hath God Said...??"). 2. Outright Denial of The Word of God ("...you will not surely die".) There's nothing new under the sun. So, put yourself in satan's shoes: The Creator of the Universe has just Declared War on You (YIKES !!!) See: Genesis 3, and the vehicle of your destruction is the 'seed of the woman' (Jesus Christ). So what are you gonna do?? I don't know bout you, but practically and tactically my 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/180,000th ect act is gonna do everything in my power to CORRUPT THE SEED OF THE WOMAN. 'duh' Right? (See: Genesis 6, Flood, Entire Old Testament). satan tried and failed miserably but the end is not yet (Another Topic). He knows that his 'goose is cooked' and since he hates MAN with a passion, he's gonna do everything in his power to take as many down with him as he can, so it's back to the Ole Tried and True... 1. Create Doubt ("Hath God Said...??"). 2. Outright Denial of The Word of God ("...you will not surely die".) We already know he and his minions are the "Powers Behind" all the Empires (Governments) of the World, Right? Cause again, GOD TOLD YOU !!! (See: Daniel Chapter 10) So do you think that satan and his minions behind the World's Governments are gonna focus their attack on: A. The Maytag Repairman et al. or B. ALL the Upper Echelon of: The Higher Institutes of Learning (Infiltrating Public Schools), Media, Seminaries, Hollywood, ect ect ... Maybe employ some 'Artistic Licence' with Secular History a bit? ???????? pssst... WAKE UP !!!!! Hope it Helps Have a Nice Day.
  5. Is Time Infinite?

    Good thing I didn't fall into any of them. Then it's a good thing I didn't say we were present with him. Well then it's a good thing I didn't fall into that "defiled heresy" and destroy anyone's faith. Yep. This is where I was going initially, but we didn't get to the "Define Existed...?" part. I take Extra Special Care not to. Post the Scripture(s)...? Define Existed...? While this is most assuredly True... I'd still like to see your answers to the questions above. True regards
  6. Is Time Infinite?

    This is Factually Incorrect. "Time" isn't a Dimension, it's merely the Conceptual Medium in which all events take place in this universe. Dimensions (Length/Width/Height) can be Physically Measured..."Time" cannot be Physically Measured. (A Clock doesn't count ) regards
  7. Discontinuity of the flood boundary

    Well obviously I used "Learning" as in Gaining Knowledge. To be extremely technical about it, you don't "Learn" Obedience in much the same way as you don't "Learn" to be quiet...you just "Shut Up"; it's an act of Volition, not a gain in knowledge. regards
  8. Is Time Infinite?

    OK. Oh yes, it surely will be Interesting! Looking Forward to it. I'll loft the first volley (with your assistance, if you don't mind)... Yep. So if you were created in "TIME" and Time has an End; Ergo... YOU MUST also END. However, if you were NOT Created in TIME, then... TIME holds no sway over you. SO, your entire appeal: "I am going to live in heaven forever with my Lord, but I had a beginning." rests on the CORRECT answers to these... Define You (Please be Uber Specific)...? Then, Validate your Beginning...? When/Where...? Scripture to contemplate before responding: (Ephesians 1:4) "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:" (Jeremiah 1:4-5) "Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, {5} Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." regards
  9. Is Time Infinite?

    Really? Define You (Please be Uber Specific)...? Then, Validate your Beginning...? When/Where...? regards ps. I noted you didn't address that trainwreck : "Time had a beginning, but it does not have an end." Do you have a comment?
  10. Discontinuity of the flood boundary

    You're welcome. Well then call/email/carrier pigeon 'David Deutsch' and tell him to fix his trainwreck. In the future, should we contact David Deutsch to ascertain what YOU believe?? What does this mean? Well his "Take" and your "Take" are conjured fairytales as I explicitly explained and illustrated. The Double Slit Experiment was done long before Richard Feynman popped on the scene. I Rest My Case. There's no such thing as a Virtual Particle; it's Oxy-Moronical on it's face. Married Bachelors are more coherent. Other than laugh at it, No ...since I already PUMMELED it. Then why are you still attempting to resurrect it? Can I be brutally honest? What on Earth are you TALKING ABOUT !!! Are you reading a different thread then commenting here? regards
  11. Is Time Infinite?

    That's why Mathematics is limited in it's descriptive power...in many cases, it has no relation to Reality. Engineers aren't "Scientists". Factually Incorrect on Two Fronts: 1. Everything that has a Beginning, has an End; this is Self Evident. 2. (Revelation 10:6) "And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be TIME NO LONGER:" He should probably focusing on reading the Bible instead of focusing on philosophy. Cosmology isn't Science, that's probably why Craig is a Philosopher. regards
  12. Discontinuity of the flood boundary

    1. Empirical means -- Observable, TESTABLE, Repeatable, and Falsifiable. So "Empirical Cross-Sections" is Non-Sequitur. 2. "can be deduced" and "interpolated" = "Just-So" Stories. 3. There is No "Globe". 4. Time is NOT Physical, for goodness sakes. To refute, please post the: Chemical Formula/Structure, Charge, Mass, Momentum, Spin, OR... Kcals/Joules/meV for "Time"...? Huh?? You even said....: "because someone over reacts to my use of the word 'geology' anywhere near the word 'science'." Then you said: "You were the one that said 'unfordable' gap." Yes, that was the conversation we had where I Illustrated quite explicitly that there was an 'Unfordable Gap' between geology and "Science". This had nothing to do with YEC or it's comparison with anything else. Radiometric Dating is a Demonstrable Fairytale. Well this isn't a Subjective "Agree/Disagree" Topic. So what does this have to do with the price of frogs legs in china? Why do you need to 'insert' time in, when it's the Conceptual Medium in which all events take place in this universe ? It's tantamount to 'inserting' water in to study Snowflakes; You don't need to... it's a Contingent Necessity. The 'Day Age' and 'Gap Theory' are feebly contrived Fairytales introduced to 'grease the skids'...laughingly attempt to reconcile the Mother Fairytale ... 'evolution' (Whatever that is??) with Scriptural Doctrines. Only if you're on Shrooms. Ahhh, not a Friggin Chance!! lol... The Many Worlds/Multiverse was first CONJURED then published IN a Comic Book... All-Star Comics #3 in 1940 !!! It's a Textbook Argument from Complete Ignorance (Fallacy) from the Black Lagoon and the most EGREGIOUS Violation of Occam's Razor ever CONJURED then Foisted --- on the generally incoherent and scientifically challenged public--- in the history of ground squirrel level reasoning...by introducing untold number of entities that can neither be confirmed or falsified!! "One tiny atoms quantum behavior replicates the entire universe and defines each alternative by all the possible consequences of that behavior. But at any moment within each human body, there on on the order of a billion times a billion times a billion atoms, each making quantum transitions. In the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, every human being, therefore, creates a billion times a billion times a billion alternative universes every second." Bernard Haisch (PhD Physics); The God Theory, p. 135. A TEAR JERKIN BELLY LAUGHER !!! Since the Majority of 'Scientists' --- (which they're not) have an "a priori" adherence to their fairytale religion "Philosophical Naturalism/Realism" aka: atheism... the Irrefutable Experimental Evidence in the Literal Thousands Without Exception --- of Quantum Mechanics (The most successful branch of Physics in History) stands in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to " IT ". That puts them in a very Uncomfortable Position ("VISE like")...you can either RECKON with The Scientific Evidence and adjust your World-View accordingly OR....Close your eyes, put your fingers in your ears and Say La La La over and over and let Cognitive Dissonance Rule the Roost!! Since that playground nonsense is laughed at by anyone who can 'Fog A Mirror', they MUST THEN... Float Mind-Numbing-- conjured from thin air, 'Interpretations'... Many Worlds ('Multiverses') as a 'get of Incoherent Jail Free Card' to cloak their mind numbing adherence to Fairytales with the facade of 'science' (which are merely clumsily contrived "Just-So" Stories) to obfuscate having to give coherent account for their ludicrous Scientifically Falsified stance. They're BUSTED, and they know it!!! Really?? Well Please do, Show and Tell...? You'd have better chances showing the 'influence' of Alexander The Greats Horse's Mane Color had on Aunt Jenny's late summer Tomato Haul in Tupelo Mississippi !! No, 'they' are Fairytales Can you show where I 'Agreed' with that Buffoonery? You wanna give "Many World's" Divine Purpose? This is akin to giving Phlogiston and Alice in Wonderland "Divine Purpose". Only with a heavy mix of LSD, Peyote, and Shrooms with a Grandpa's Cough Medicine kicker. regards
  13. Days of Creation - Must they be Consecutive?

    The Earth doesn't 'rotate' , it's Stationary. To Refute, then: 1. Please post the Scripture(s) denoting rotation...? 2. Or reconcile this... For the Coriolis Effect to Exist, you MUST HAVE (i.e., the "Necessary Conditions"): 1. Two differing Frames of Reference (One Rotating Coordinate System (Non-Inertial) --- The Earth and One Non-Rotating Coordinate System (Inertial)-- The Atmosphere ...and anything in it)... "CC.12 The Coriolis Effect: When set in motion, freely moving objects, including AIR [Atmosphere] and WATER masses [Clouds/Water Vapor], move in straight paths while the Earth continues to ROTATE INDEPENDENTLY. Because freely moving objects ARE NOT carried with the Earth as it Rotates, they are subject to an apparent deflection called the “Coriolis effect.” To an observer rotating with the Earth, freely moving objects that travel in a straight line appear to travel in a curved path on the Earth." Segar, Douglas A; Introduction to Ocean Sciences, 2nd Edition: Critical Concept Reminders -- CC.12 The Coriolis Effect (pp. 313, 314, 323, 324), ISBN: 978-0-393-92629-3, 2007. http://www.wwnorton.com/college/geo/oceansci/cc/cc12.html In other words, anything not "Tethered" to the Earth is 'Freely Moving'. 2. The Object in question not Physically Attached to the Rotating Coordinate System appears to deflect (i.e., Moves Independently of the Rotating Coordinate System) from the vantage point anywhere on the rotating coordinate system -- aka: the 'Coriolis Effect'. So, if the Coriolis Effect Exists (with Respect to the Earth), then a Flight from Charlotte North Carolina to LA (Non-Stop) traveling @ 500 mph (Air Speed) --- with both locations roughly 35th degree N Latitude, (i.e., both 'allegedly' spinning @ 860 mph ) should be ~ *1.5 hours!!* (But it's ~ *4.5 hrs!!*) Charlotte to LA Flight: Air Speed 500 mph. Ground Speed: 500 mph + 860 mph "Alleged" rotation speed = 1360 mph. So in my example: 1. Two differing Frames of Reference: (Earth and Atmosphere -- and everything in it) 2. The Plane in the Atmosphere is "Freely Moving" (not attached) to the Rotating Coordinate System and is flying in a straight path. In other words, Based on the Law of Non-Contradiction each (The Coriolis Effect and the Charlotte Flight at 1.5 hours) are either: Both TRUE or Both FALSE. The Flight is most assuredly FALSE!! In conclusion, the Earth is *NOT* "Spinning"; ERGO..."The Ball" goes by way of the DoDo Bird or you're a Stationary Ball Geo-Centrist. Voila. The only way the above can be refuted is if you're of the position that the Atmosphere 'spins' with the Earth. So then: 1. Please explain how the Coriolis Effect can EXIST when the NECESSARY CONDITIONS for it to EXIST are Two Differing Coordinate Systems (Reference Frames) -- One Rotating --"Earth" and One Non-Rotating-- the "Atmosphere" and everything in it...? 2. Show the Experiment where 'Gases'/Gas rotate in Lock-Step with a Rotating Solid Body just 5 cm above the surface, then provide the mechanism....? 3. Please explain "EAST/North/South" Surface Winds...? (Bonus Question: How you can have different wind speeds and directions simultaneously at differing elevations of the atmosphere while the atmosphere is collectively 'spinning' East, in Unison...?) btw, These are Contradictory Statements: 1. The Atmosphere 'spins' in Lock-Step with the Earth. 2. The Existence of "EAST/North/South" Surface Winds. Which do you think is FALSE? MOREOVER, following the 'yarn'... Every Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere traveling horizontally from the equator to the center of rotationMUST HAVE differing Tangential Speeds; and every Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere rising in elevation from each respective horizontal Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere MUST HAVE differing Tangential Speeds (In fact, the higher the elevation... the faster they'll need to travel to keep up !!); and all of this rolling along at differing speeds... in Unison, EAST?? This is so far beyond Preposterous Ludicrousness Absurdity, 'evolution' (whatever that is??) and Multiverses... are BLUSHING!! AND, does anyone know how far up this 'Increasing Speed' Rope-A-Dope Fairytale Spinning Atmosphere ENDS?? I'd like to see that...it'll give a Whole New Meaning to Guillotine "WIND SHEAR"!! Goodness Gracious People. ps. Are the Gas Molecules attached to each other by: Velcro?? Glue?? Pixie Dust?? Other?? And where is the energy coming from for the continuous "Shot in the Arm" injections needed to keep each successive Cubic Nanometer of atmosphere higher elevation brethren in tow? Alice in Wonderland is more tenable than the "Spinning-Ball" religion. regards
  14. Adam and Eve as Genealogical vs Genetic Ancestors

    Exactly! regards
  15. Is Time Infinite?

    That's not a 'Belief', it's a Stone Cold Fact and is an immutable consequence of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. It's called Maximum Entropy..."The Heat Death" --- The Big Chill. 1. Define "Celestial Objects"...? 2. Technically, there is no "Space". 3. Are you Appealing to the Fairytale "Inflation"? Correct. But that "Heat Death" is billions of years in the future. The Lord will end it much much sooner. Correct. regards
×