Jump to content
IGNORED

Women as preacher


Jacqueline

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  123
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,111
  • Content Per Day:  0.39
  • Reputation:   35
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/29/2002
  • Status:  Offline

I wear a covering to signify my willingness to Accept my place in the headship. That place is under my husband who is under Christ who is under God.

:emot-highfive::):) Papasangel!!! Good for you!!

Not to mention - the Scripture specifically says the Angels are watching you - why would they be watching to see if you have the natural hair that God gave you?? :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  79
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/06/2004
  • Status:  Offline

:wub: They (the angels) would be watching because in the time of the Bible, shaved or cut hair signified a prostitute--hence the reason a distinction is made between long hair as "good" and short hair as "bad".

1 Cor 11--an footnote indicating an alternate translation of the Greek:

5 And every woman who prays or prophesies with no covering on her head dishonors her head

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  199
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  711
  • Content Per Day:  0.09
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/27/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/28/1989

Ok, I didn't read the topic from the beginning, but how did we come from why women supposedly can't teach in church, to hair? Here's my idea, someone may have posted a reply to this already but:

QUOTE(Super Jew @ Dec 29 2004, 02:40 PM)

QUOTE(Cherub_Rocket @ Dec 29 2004, 03:56 PM)

QUOTE(Super Jew @ Dec 29 2004, 01:52 PM)

but the bible doesn't say much about them preaching from a pulpit.

From my perspective, it does...

women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says.

1 Corinthians 14:34

Read it in the entire context. It talks about them getting permission from their husbands.

At home, yes, but not at church...

"As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home..."

1 Corinthians 14 33-35

I do not believe women are called to be pastors.

Could be wrong, but I can only go by the convictions I have.

That DOESN'T nessesarily mean that women can only but preach at home if they ask their husbands, BUT to ask their husbands at home if they can teach at church. I believe that women CAN be preachers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  79
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/06/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Hehe--it is confusing, I guess--we got here because WorkInProgress and I both believe women are not to teach, and now we are debating HOW submissive we are to be! LOL--I love the way these forums go all over a topic!

KC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

suzanne is right ,Jesus makes it plain not to allow it. However women have been instrumental in leading people to the lord(Iam one A GRANDMOTHERS PRAYER) I also believe the reason is the power women have over men .The garden is a perfect example.Hope that helps..FRED

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am not sure if this was addressed yet; is hard to wade through all the posts.

What I believe the scripture is referring to when Paul says to the women to keep silent is that certain women were questioning the speaker in the meeting. Or speaking out comments. Paul is addressing the issue of respect for the speaker. Hence, if they want to know anything they should ask their husbands at home.

As far as the comment that women should be silent as the law says also, let's look at this scripture:

Gal 3:25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Paul seems to contradict his own words with this.

My thoughts on this is that we are to be "in the spirit" concerning everything from submission to our husbands, to preaching, witnessing, whatever. In the Spirit there is neither male or female so if we are preaching in the spirit it matters not to Holy Spirit who or what gender is the vessel He is using. He is looking for those who will be subject to Him.

In the Spirit we know how to treat others. We know it is not polite to interrupt. Paul also said in another place to let everyone speak one by one. And others would judge the message whether it was from God or not.

Our present ways of having church are not according to the scriptures. May be the reason for the confusion of issues. We are a "living" body of Christ. If we are living, moving, and having our being in Him, there will be no divisions of opinion of what is right or wrong. So our problem is not law or not be preached; or authority of men and women; our problem is ARE WE IN THE SPIRIT AND FOLLOWING HIM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahsway, I think you are dead on in your beliefs.

The verses talking about head coverings are figurative to the authority of men and women. Women are to have their heads covered (be under man's authority) in order that the "proper order" that Paul speaks of is demonstrated.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Whoa, S.J. I totally disagree.

They are no more 'figurative' then the parts about women not teaching are 'only for then'. :thumbsup:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I found an article that explains my position on the matter very well.

First, we need to understand why this chapter was written. Paul had received a letter from the Corinthian church regarding many problems it was encountering. This epistle was written to help straighten out some confusing issues. One of these was the question of whether a woman should veil, or cover, her head in church since the custom was that most women kept their heads covered in and out of the church. The reason this was a much discussed issue was that one of the oral Jewish traditions dictated that when entering the temple for worship, the males, or "heads of the house," were to wear the Jewish tallith, or veil. According to the Jewish tradition this was a sign of reverence toward God and a condemnation of sin. Paul was very strongly against all Jewish legalism (circumcision being one of these) being imposed on new Christian converts. He was also opposed to the veiling or covering of men because they were no longer under any condemnation or guilt since Jesus took that away through His sacrifice.

Now the question had come up over women veiling or covering in church. What would he say for them to do? Paul seized the opportunity to teach them by presenting a spiritual analogy that would enable them to arrive at their own conclusion. We find Paul's conclusion to their question of women veiling in verse 16, "But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God." He simply says this is a custom of the women, but it is not a church ordinance. This explanation clarifies the matter for us today, but we will miss a beautiful spiritual application if we fail to look at these verses further as every portion of the Scriptures contains some deep and eternal principle applicable to every age. We can see that Paul is using an analogy here. He is not discussing a cloth covering, or veil, when he speaks of a woman having her head covered, because in verse 15 he clearly says a woman's hair is given to her for a covering. "But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering."

What kind of covering does he mean? He is not speaking of a literal covering at all, but a spiritual covering. Let us see what this spiritual covering is. Isaiah 30:1 says, "Woe to the rebellious children, saith the Lord, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin." We can see here that the Spirit of God is our covering. He warned those that sought any "covering" other than His Spirit. This should speak plainly to us that our covering is not to be found in men.

Another verse that tells us about God's covering is Psalm 104:1-2, "Bless the Lord, O my soul. O Lord my God, thou art very great; thou art clothed with honour and majesty. Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain." We see that God is covered in honor, majesty and light. Where light is, there is no darkness and evil; where honor is, there is truth.

The covering God is talking about is the Spirit of Truth and Light. With an understanding of this covering, we can now look at verse 4 of 1 Corinthians 11 and see that it says, "Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head." Verse 3 tells us who his head is, "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; ...and the head of Christ is God.'' If Christ is man's head and God is Christ's head, then if the man covers Jesus so that the light of God cannot be seen in Him, it is a dishonor for Christ. The Bible speaks that we are to let our light shine, not to cover it.

"Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven'' (Matthew 5:14-16).

If men are going to prophesy, pray and minister in the church, then they are not to dishonor their head, Jesus. They must let the light of God shine through them. Men are not to "cover" God's glory and majesty, but let it come forth from them. This light will go forth with truth and honor.

In the Old Testament it was a shame for men to cover their heads; that is why the Jewish tallith was worn (to represent the shame and guilt of their sins). Jeremiah speaks of men covering their heads because of their shame. "Because the ground is chapt, for there was no rain in the earth, the plowmen were ashamed, they covered their heads" (Jeremiah 14:4). Whenever men do not allow Christ to flow out of them, but cover their head (Christ), it is a shame. Men do not have to defend their position as long as Christ is flowing from them, as Jesus will "cover" for them. They don't have to "cover" for Him. The Lord will justify those that are shining for Him. The Lord's mercy, love, kindness and goodness should be evident in those men who are in the ministry. They will be gentle to their wives, considerate and loving if they are truly letting God shine through them. Christ is the man's head and should not be covered, or it will bring dishonor to the Lord.

Now what about women? 1 Corinthians 11:5 says, "But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven." Who is the married woman's matrimonial head? Of course, her husband, the man. Now the list in verse 3 is not a chain of command because although God is at the top He shares His glory equally with Jesus, even though He is His head. The same should be true in the marriage relationship. If a man is truly the "head" after the pattern of Christ, he will support and lift his wife up to his own level of authority. The true "headship" is won by self-sacrificing love which is how Christ won His Church, not by rule and domination. The woman's head is to be "covered." How does she cover her head, that is, her husband? One way she is to cover him is by the words of her mouth.

David realized that the words we speak produce a blessing or a curse. Psalm 140:7 and 9 says, "O God the Lord, the strength of my salvation, thou hast covered my head in the day of battle...As for the head of those that compass me about, let the mischief of their own lips cover them."

If a woman's lips do not confess the Word of God and truth over her husband, she will be "uncovering" her head. If a woman tears her husband down with ugly and degrading words, and her lips speak negative things against him, she will find in her "day of battle" she will not be covered by the Lord. David was covered because he spoke those things pleasing to the Lord.

Women who pray or minister in public should not degrade their husbands in their private lives as this is a shame before the Lord. It brings shame to their matrimonial "heads." Women should not uncover their "heads" as the Scripture says it would be the same if she were to go about with her head shaven. No woman would purposely shave her head, yet women are doing this spiritually when they expose their husband's faults, malign them or degrade them in any way. We are to cover our husband's weaknesses, not "uncover" them. There is a story in the Old Testament about Noah that shows us how displeased God is when His men are exposed and not covered.

"And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant" (Genesis 9:20-27).

Noah's son, Ham, discovered his father's nakedness, but instead of covering him, he went and told his two brothers. Shem and Japheth not only refused to look on their father in his exposed state, but covered him as well.

As wives, we should cover our husband's faults and failures, not expose them to others. It's a shame to leave our "heads uncovered." We know that because man and wife are one flesh, for either of them to hurt or expose the other, it is the same as if they were doing it to themselves. We can see that after Noah discovered what had happened, he pronounced a curse upon the son of Ham (Canaan) and a blessing upon Shem and Japheth. When wives uncover their husband's nakedness, they actually bring a curse against their heads and their marriages. A woman cannot talk about her husband without it affecting her because she, in essence, is talking about herself. If women expect God to bless their marriages, then they must "cover" their heads. A woman who is guilty of exposing her husband becomes uncovered too. The Lord cannot bless her with His anointing when she walks out uncovered by God. Husbands and wives are to lay their lives down for each other.

In conclusion, God is our covering spiritually, for both the man and the woman. Both husbands and wives should cover one another in prayers and with their devotion and loving deeds. The Lord is always teaching us about heart attitudes in the New Testament of the Bible and many of the parables of Jesus and the illustrations of Paul were used to point out these very things. Paul's conclusion to the question of women veiling in I Corinthians 11:16, "But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God." He simply says this is a custom of the women, but it is not a church ordinance. Therefore, if in some cultures, the women are still covering their heads and it is their custom, it would not hurt us to honor that custom if we go there to preach by covering our head if we are a woman. (This could also pertain to our dress as western women when we are in a foreign land. We should restrain from wearing short dresses and shorts. Personally, I don't think wearing skimpy clothes is a good witness, even in our own country, as it doesn't represent Godly dress.) The people we are preaching to in foreign lands might be more open to receive our message if we are considerate of their customs. Paul made this statement:

1 Corinthians 9:20-22 "And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; 21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some."

Source

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Thank you!!! God just used you to truly humble THIS WOMAN!!! AMEN AND AGAIN I SAY AMEN!!!! It is sooooo hard when the Lord shows us our faults and it could not be any plainer this day than the rain that is falling outside...In His service and love, Jina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest hubertdorm
Am not sure if this was addressed yet; is hard to wade through all the posts. 

What I believe the scripture is referring to when Paul says to the women to keep silent is that certain women were questioning the speaker in the meeting.  Or speaking out comments.  Paul is addressing the issue of respect for the speaker.  Hence, if they want to know anything they should ask their husbands at home.

As far as the comment that women should be silent as the law says also, let's look at this scripture:

Gal 3:25  But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

Gal 3:26  For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

Gal 3:27  For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

Gal 3:28  There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Gal 3:29  And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Paul seems to contradict his own words with this. 

My thoughts on this is that we are to be "in the spirit" concerning everything from submission to our husbands, to preaching, witnessing, whatever.  In the Spirit there is neither male or female so if we are preaching in the spirit it matters not to Holy Spirit who or what gender is the vessel He is using.  He is looking for those who will be subject to Him. 

In the Spirit we know how to treat others.  We know it is not polite to interrupt.  Paul also said in another place to let everyone speak one by one.  And others would judge the message whether it was from God or not.

Our present ways of having church are not according to the scriptures.  May be the reason for the confusion of issues.  We are a "living" body of Christ.  If we are living, moving, and having our being in Him, there will be no divisions of opinion of what is right or wrong.  So our problem is not law or not be preached; or authority of men and women; our problem is ARE WE IN THE SPIRIT AND FOLLOWING HIM?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I agree that Christ is able and willing to use either gender and any nationality to spread the gospel through the workings of the Spirit. However, I do not believe Galatians 3 contradicts any of Paul's words regarding his instructions for women to remain silent. In Galatians, Paul is addressing a predominate problem in the church dealing with circumcision and the Law of Moses. We are sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, not through the law or by geneology or race. All are equal in His sight. No one has reason to boast.

Think about this: If Galatians 3 literally meant that genders were of no consequence to the Lord, homosexuality would be an impossibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, It seems I have to put two cents in everywhere lately. I truly believe a woman should not have authority over a man. I can only go by my own convictiona and am by no means trying to offend anyone. God did things for a certain reason, He said it I believe it. It is true quite a few churches allow women pastors not our church but other "liberal" denominations. I am not trying to offend anyone and if I have I apologize in advance. The Bible says a woman cannot Pastor a church so I believe it. Also it is hard for a man to follow a woman because that is not how God intended it be. In that aspect I too am extremely old fashioned. I believe the womens lib movement was indeed a stepping stool for satan to infiltrate even further into some church denominations. Again no offense intended. Not to stray too far is there such a thing as a liberal Christian? In the service of our great Great God and King Christ Jesus, Jina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...