kat8585 Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 1,360 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 7,866 Content Per Day: 1.23 Reputation: 26 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/22/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/18/1946 Author Share Posted September 21, 2007 , and it would be much cheaper just to send them to a GP. It would be much cheaper in the long run to deport them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forrestkc Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 114 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 4,015 Content Per Day: 0.60 Reputation: 8 Days Won: 1 Joined: 12/15/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted September 21, 2007 , and it would be much cheaper just to send them to a GP. It would be much cheaper in the long run to deport them. And how do we do that? It would be much cheaper if the Cheap Labor Conservatives quit busting labor up and started supporting real penalties on companies that hire illegals. If there were no jobs for them here, they would not be here, its as simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliyahuw Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 2 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,263 Content Per Day: 0.20 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/11/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/17/1961 Share Posted September 21, 2007 He should be treated regardless. However, what Hillary is proposing is that in the event he has the income to afford health insurance, he should be required to have it, if he cant necessarily afford it, then he would qualify for tax credits to help him pay for it. What is wrong with that? And how is it any different now other than, were not getting taxed to death! He would get treated no matter what and get billed for it. if he paid it then fine, if not the taxpayor pays it. sounds like the only difference is that we eliminate the government as the middle man which is ALWAYS the best way to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliyahuw Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 2 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,263 Content Per Day: 0.20 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/11/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/17/1961 Share Posted September 21, 2007 , and it would be much cheaper just to send them to a GP. It would be much cheaper in the long run to deport them. And how do we do that? Easy, wait for them to gather at a protest rally, surround them and as they leave ask for identification. Any question as to whether their here legally, detain, verify then line em up at the border and march them back across. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfw Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Junior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 0 Topics Per Day: 0 Content Count: 109 Content Per Day: 0.02 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/31/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted September 21, 2007 I have always been opposed to universal health care. Something I believe Jay Leno said sums it up pretty well: "Let's put the Government in charge of health care. After all, they've done so well with Welfare, Social Security, education, the national debt..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtwo Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 21 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,144 Content Per Day: 0.18 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/24/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1978 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Okay... yes, you'd be FORCED to have health insurance. Why is nobody asking "why?" Why is coerced health insurance coverage so very vital to this plan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forrestkc Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 114 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 4,015 Content Per Day: 0.60 Reputation: 8 Days Won: 1 Joined: 12/15/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted September 21, 2007 Okay... yes, you'd be FORCED to have health insurance. Why is nobody asking "why?" Why is coerced health insurance coverage so very vital to this plan? Because, hospitals are forced to treat you even if you don't have coverage. Then, the costs of treating you gets passed on to those with coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliyahuw Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 2 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,263 Content Per Day: 0.20 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/11/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/17/1961 Share Posted September 21, 2007 Okay... yes, you'd be FORCED to have health insurance. Why is nobody asking "why?" Why is coerced health insurance coverage so very vital to this plan? Simple, When they force everyone onto a government plan, then they gain control over the population. Look how well they have done with welfare. the dems get the welfare vote, they usually get the SS vote cause they scare the hell out of the seniors every election by claiming that the republicans are out to do away with their social security. its nothing more than to guarantee that the dems survive as a political party. Nothing more than that. Its all about power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forrestkc Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 114 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 4,015 Content Per Day: 0.60 Reputation: 8 Days Won: 1 Joined: 12/15/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted September 21, 2007 Okay... yes, you'd be FORCED to have health insurance. Why is nobody asking "why?" Why is coerced health insurance coverage so very vital to this plan? Simple, When they force everyone onto a government plan, then they gain control over the population. Look how well they have done with welfare. the dems get the welfare vote, they usually get the SS vote cause they scare the hell out of the seniors every election by claiming that the republicans are out to do away with their social security. its nothing more than to guarantee that the dems survive as a political party. Nothing more than that. Its all about power. Ok wait a second. For one, there are about 7 million people on welfare. Few of them vote, and welfare, contrary to popular belief, is a tiny percentage of federal outlays. As to Social Security, conservative Republicans are fundamentally opposed to it. They always have been, and anyone that sees merit in the program, or benefits from it, should rightly be concerned about those Republicans that are and always have been fundamentally opposed to it. Finally, Hillary's plan is basically the same plan that Romney, a Republican, pushed and signed into law as governor of Massachusetts. The reason why you should be required to have health coverage is the same reason you are required to have auto insurance. The reason being is that if you don't have health coverage, and you get sick or injured, the rest of us get to pick up the tab. Otherwise, your going without health insurance has the potential and in some cases high likelihood of infringing upon the rights of others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papasangel Posted September 21, 2007 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 70 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1,513 Content Per Day: 0.19 Reputation: 39 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/19/2002 Status: Offline Birthday: 08/27/1959 Share Posted September 21, 2007 heck why don't we just do away with health insurance completely. Just put doctors and nurses on salary in the goverment and require them to see so many patients per day. That would make more sense than hillarys plan. That way free medical care for all.. POP,,,,,,,,,, I like dreaming...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts