Sparks

I cannot believe you are having to guess, and since it would take many paragraphs to catch you up, lets just say he is righting many wrongs done to himself, and to the American people. In short, he is trying to repair the country from the massive damage of the prior administration, and only has 2 practical years to get the majority of the work done. The first 100 days of his presidency are key to fixing much of it, so he is on the move. If you want to understand this plan, look up Project 2025, or Agenda 47. These plans were written by conservatives like Heritage Foundation. I suggest you go to the source instead of Liberal Media interpretations of it.

Good point. It's interesting that so far Trump is going after the evil gangs, and the most dangerous illegals. I see Trump's deportation nabbed 50 Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang members at some secret party they were having. These are people who deal in evil and law breaking, as a business. Later, the administration plans to swing back around and get the rest of the illegals.

You really don't know what's going on with Trump's actions?

Well said!

... do you mean perp walked like criminals? Aren't they criminals? Thank God for Trump, who is doing something about the criminal invasion.

I wonder if Biden was aware that by preemptively pardoning people, those people must testify if called, and may not lean on the 5th Amendment of the Constitution to remain silent. They could be held in contempt of Congress, for example, if they don't spill the beans at a hearing. I read the entire list of Executive Orders. Not a bad start on day one!

James Cameron produced a film called The Exodus Decoded in 2006. It featured the work of Simcha Jacobovici, an investigative archeologist. Simcha adjusted some time lines based on clues, and the pieces seemed to fit. It showed some of the areas you described, and reasoning for the findings. Naturally, the secular archeologists and historians slam the findings, but that alone probably makes it true.

This a political song that is directly about Socialism. I wrote this in another thread about Kamala Harris, but it applies here as well. Socialism is a direct replacement for Capitialism, and once you understand that a Socialist has to destroy Capitalism so that they might implement Socialism, it becomes clear what they are doing. Their bad policy is not a misunderstanding of good policy; they ultimately want 'equality,' for all, by bringing everyone down to the most common denominator; no rich or poor, no countries, no personal property, no religion. They want to take away things that people tend to fight about until they have world peace. The lyrics of Imagine by John Lennon illustrate this ultimate desire in song, the biggest problem being you have to crack a few eggs (kill people who disagree) to get your utopia of equality and world peace. Imagine Imagine there's no heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today... Aha-ah... Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion, too Imagine all the people Living life in peace... You... You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one Imagine no possessions I wonder if you can No need for greed or hunger A brotherhood of man Imagine all the people Sharing all the world... You... You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will live as one

It's great that you went out and researched this. David E. Martin has a special ability with patent searches, and other research. He is a master-class researcher! For what it is worth, I posted the video also, here in the forums:

... said the man who refuses to look. How would you know if you have not looked? It is entirely verifiable, but only if you take the time look at it. Also, a Whistle Blower has special access and expertise to present. It's not just Herman from the convenience store, it is someone who risks their career to point out lies about something, or the mishandling of something and has the good character to report it. You can tell when the Whistle Blower is right by their evidence, and when the government itself does not deny the Whistle Blower is right, but instead tries to say the data is "misinterpreted," yet government does not volunteer the supposedly correct interpretation, and they drop the topic. A "breakthrough infection" is used to describe when a vaccinated individual becomes infected with a virus despite having received the vaccine for that virus. It means the virus "broke through" the protection that the vaccine should have provided. It means the vaccine failed.

Congress told you where the virus came from in a recent report. Patents tell you where it came from. Funding from NIH tells you were it came from. The virus names tell you where it came from. We know where it came from, and who developed it. Here you are quoting from 2020 again.

I appreciate the offer for me to fetch the stick for you. You are right, but that is a very deceptive way to put it. The truth is that if a person naturally gets some type of virus, and lives to fully recover, their immune system will spot any re-infection and take care of it before the human host even notices a sniffle. A person might get hundreds of re-infections per day, but the body will recognize it due to 'memory,' and it will kill an infection off before it can take hold. You absolutely can ruin an immune system with vaccines, though, and this whole effect. I am sure that is what you mean to say. Sometimes a single Whistle Bl0wer is all you get. The honesty pool is very shallow in government work, but considering you won't even look into the accusation or do the math yourself with the raw data provided, who cares what you think about it? Your One.Opinion becomes irrelevant when you know nothing about it, and then claim it is speculative. How would you know without looking? You honestly sound like those officials at the Pentagon trying to explain away whatever is hovering over military bases, as safe. They claim to have no idea what those things are, but then they claim they do know they are safe. How silly. Just so you know, you cannot perform science without observing. You don't just get to claim something is garbage, but never look at it. I know the Liberal Scientific Method is to state something as fact, and then discount anything that gets in the way (an a priori fallacy), but that is not how the real Scientific Method works.

A breakthrough describes a condition of a failed vaccine, only. There is nothing to break through with your own immune system, weak or not. A breakthrough infection is a case of illness in which a vaccinated individual becomes infected with the illness, because the vaccine has failed to provide complete immunity against the pathogen (currently only viruses). -- Wikipedia Except in the case of mRNA vaccines, which are not vaccines at all and are gene therapies, and which don't work to immunize, protect, or prevent spread the disease. Everything breaks through with mRNA. Haha! You are such a Liberal! Liberals famously accuse others of doing exactly what they are doing. Why do you guys do that? How many times have I asked you to look at the Congressional report about the Plandemic and Whistle Blowers, and you have openly refused!? It is YOU who ignores facts and data! You can point your finger right at yourself on this one.

Well, not any reasonable ones that you didn't fear to look at. You should include that idea when you make claims like this. Neither are safe, nor effective.

If you are infected by a virus, and survive it, your immune system will remember the virus, and will destroy it again if it shows up again. That's what immune systems do. If you want to say that breakthrough infections happen with vaccines, you are also admitting vaccines don't work. You inject, get a good 'immune response,' are exposed to the same virus after a couple of weeks, and the vaccine fails anyway.

Yes, the if my memory serves, the president of Bayer actually said this out loud at a speech. I think it was Bayer executive Stefan Oelrich in 2021 that said mRNA shots are a gene therapy, but they were renamed to vaccine to be accepted. The main stream media went into damage control when he said it, but I heard him say it. He was clear enough.

Can you agree that "Immunity" and "Immune Response" are different? If you were injected with a legacy vaccine, and if it worked, you were likely made immune from the virus or disease.

All hell broke lose for the past 4 years, but you somehow missed it.

Hydroxychloroquine just enables antivirals to enter the blood cells easier. Zinc, for example, is such an antiviral. As to why it was not used and made more available: you cannot have an Emergency Use Authorization on something like a vaccine if there are other solutions available, so those who wanted the vaccine sold for their own personal profit, saw to it that any solutions were taken off the shelf, demonized, and licenses threatened. There are a lot of antivirals that are natural that slow down a virus' ability to replicate, such as zinc.

A RINO is just another kind of Democrat. You might as well say Democrats are the biggest problem, but somehow you never do.

Yes. Only about 6% of those who were reported as Covid deaths, were really killed by Covid. Early on, CDC quietly adjusted their numbers and actually reported the truth, but they left you to do your own math to see that truth, and the media sure didn't report the truth. In fact, the media stopped reporting deaths because the deaths were so low, and instead started reporting cases which were warped by the unreliable PCR tests. They lie with statistics.

I am afraid we do inherit original sin, but you are right in that we have plenty of our own personal sin. You can see inherited sin here, in Psalms: Psalm 51:5 (NLT) For I was born a sinner— yes, from the moment my mother conceived me. King David wrote that, acknowledging sin is inherited at birth, and that we were conceived in sin. You mentioned yourself the corrupt condition in which we are born.

Yes, you have to do the research because they don't have medical codes for malpractice and medical mistakes, but some journals already have: Medical errors are third-leading cause of death in the US So, if a liver was damaged in surgery by a doctor and is the real cause of death, the cause of death might be listed as a cardio vascular event because the heart eventually stopped. It's a little deceptive how insurance medical codes can disguise the truth. Incidentally, police act like they are in the most dangerous jobs in existence, but in reality they are not even in the top 40 most dangerous jobs. But because they keep saying it, and maybe even believe it, there is a psychological effect that sweeps the nation that make people believe being a policeman is the most dangerous job in existence.

Merry Christmas!

You didn't write anything about that.