PlanetChee

I like the scriptures you shared here.

True. Britains allowed the government to take their right to self defense away. How does a nation of free people do that? Especially when in the world those citizens know there is a cult ideology that would have them dead because they are not Muslim. And then to be disarmed and later have that same government allow members of that murdering cult into your homeland by the thousands. It's an invasion. No wonder Muslim terrorists are becoming so bold. Who's going to stop them? Not even the police are armed.

I think it is about inserting a totalitarian control into nations that adopt this green nonsense plan. Control of persons movement, consumerism, privacy. They have smart houses now that are computer controlled and for the rich. There's smart thermostats that a lot of utilities I've heard about around the nation are having people install. This cuts down on "waste" of electricity. Eventually it'll all move to that. Government will control everything in the name of environmental conservatism. Smart cars for instance come out every year. ON-STAR and those companies like it have complete control of your car. New cars have even been hacked. And the hackers have steered the car into an accident. EZPass tracks your movements and keeps a log. Smart Phones are being given away now by carriers if you buy one of their plans. Smart Phones can eavesdrop on you. Film you. Record audio. Last year a guy was arrested for murder. He'd killed this man and he as telling this buddy of his all about it. His Smart Phone "butt dialed" 911 while he was relating the details of his first degree murder of this gang banger he'd had beef with. And of course as they do, 911 recorded the whole thing. A gang banger doesn't have 911 on speed dial on his smart phone. And unless his butt has appendages it doesn't reach out and dial 911 on its own. He was a suspect police were looking at during their investigation. And then his phone calls 911 while he's confessing to a buddy about the murder they're looking at him for? Right. Samsung TV's can tune in and listen to you at home. They claim it's for marketing purposes that they can do that. If they can tune in on audio what good is that if they can't put a face to the voice? I would say they can see you too. We're slowly being converted to a government control of everything. And the excuse is it is for our own good. Or the good of the planet. If it was about the good of the planet solar panels would be installed on the White house roof by now. And on the congressional building. The SCOTUS.

Sure I have. They're not as dangerous as people make out. I swam with sharks in the water on the gulf coast too. No problem.

That's because they make money making the rules for the rest of us to obey. Lobbyists are the middlemen in such transactions. It's green energy alright. Folding green. And high dollar perks as reward. Al Gore piped up and condemned President Trump pulling out of this accord. That's a man who's Tennessee ranch pulls enormous electric bills to light it. And Gore was awarded the Nobel peace prize for his plagiarized fiction movie, inconvenient truth. Boy was that the right title. The inconvenient truth that he stole clips from the Hollywood movie, "Day After Tomorrow", to show the ice melt. And he's not got the nerve to be producing a sequel.

True. They don't have men like Churchill in Britain today. God be with the British people. Their government made them sitting ducks . Lambs to the slaughter for a terrorist cult intending to own their lands. I can't imagine parliament will convene and give guns to the citizens. They're going to let it be and suffer the consequences.

True. And they're not ecumenical either. How many churches or synagogues exist in Saudi Arabia?

It's reported that in Australia Muslims there are voicing objection as they take offense that their Muslim children have to sing the Australian national anthem. Slowly but surely what is often called creeping Sharia enters a nation where Muslims are in large number. Islam does not teach assimilation into a culture where the Muslim immigrants have transplanted themselves. Or entered as refugees. When refugees are typically by law in most countries are to return to their homeland once conflict has abated. How often do we read that has happened with refugees in America ? There are Iranian refugees on TV now celebrating their latest season in a reality TV show. And they're all very rich. I can understand the fear that suggests this as a solution. General Flynn called terrorist Islamists like unto a creeping cancer that metastasizes when its cells, people, enter into a country. He knows what Islam is and he's right. What do we do about the terror that is here? And has already advanced itself in domestic strikes? Internment camps would set off a civil war I believe. Then again maybe that is what's going to ultimately happen. One thing I noticed about Donald Trump's campaign, and I did vote for him, because Hillary was not an option and I've voted since I was 18. Near the end of his campaign he started to invoke the phrase, law and order. Over and over again at different stops on the trail. Here's a thought I'm throwing into the ring. If you want to change a country's civil identity, its national identity, in our case a free democratic Constitutional republic, how do you do that "overnight"? Martial law . How is that accomplished? Create an enemy that threatens the free Democratic republic's citizens and way of life. That threatens national security. Implement martial law to hold down the threat. The enemy within cannot become victorious in overthrowing millions of armed citizens determined to stay free. We'd fight. But the enemy empowered can use the guise of national protection and the necessity of abandoning rights in order to be made safe from that enemy within. September 11th, 2001 provided opportunity to see how that works. After the USPA , U.S Patriot Act, was passed into law at a record rate for a bill supposedly written weeks after the attacks, man on the street reporters were asking citizens what they thought about the limits it imparted against their civil rights. One woman I'll never forget because what she said was exactly what that creator of enemies would hope to find in millions of Americans. She said, if I have to give up a few of my rights and freedoms to feel safe in my home country I'm OK with that. And yet, installing fear is a recipe to then install a fear remover. Humans are self-absorbed by nature. Survival is paramount in our minds. If not ours, then our family. And that's why what's being suggested by this Fox host rings as a warning. Maybe a precursor for law and order in the face of a national threat that we never saw coming. Those who don't learn from history. (warning Godwin's law charge in 3,2,1....) Has anyone watched the 1998 film, The Siege?

Happening now in Manchester England. Terrorists will not stop the universal voice that is music! God be with the people of freedom. And God's justice find and stop the demons of allah. Amen.

God be with the USA.

No, it is not. I'll tell you why. America has been under a perpetual declared state of national emergency since the 30's. Obama extended that order in 2016. It is illegal to threaten or imply threat against the life of the President or VP of the U.S..18 U.S.C. 871 - THREATS AGAINST PRESIDENT AND SUCCESSORS TO THE PRESIDENCY §871. Threats against President and successors to the Presidency (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. SCOTUS decision Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project. Incitement to an act of terrorism is against the law under the U.S. Patriot Act. It isn't covered under free speech. America has been threatened by the Islamic State. ISIS. Domestic terror acts by their operatives on domestic soil are evidence they and their operatives are here. A woman in Oklahoma was decapitated by a Muslim terrorist while at work. He attempted to decapitate a female coworker after and was shot by the off duty officer who was also the company CEO. He lived. Domestic terrorists serving the Islamic State are a clear and present danger in America. Incitement under Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, is illegal. Holding up the head of our President, bloody and ripped , is considered incitement. Displaying the results of a murderous assault on Donald Trump, decapitated is an act, a display, in a manner demonstrated by ISIS terrorists in the homeland and abroad. And that is illegal. That is incitement. Burning a picture isn't the same thing. Holding up a representation of Donald Trump dead , bloody, decapitated, is sending the message that is how he should be. It is incitement to kill.

Not even remotely the same thing.

No, you apparently don't get it. Maybe the U.S. Code, Federal law, that has been posted about in threads like this will help you to get it. You don't have the right to make a death threat or imply death against the President of the United States of America. You should know that.

You really can't say that. This isn't a free speech issue. Death threats aren't covered under free speech articles in the Constitution. Don't believe it? Walk up to a cop and hold up the effigy of a cop's head with a police uniform hat on it. This hatred that is shown by the rapidly declining in morals Left isn't surprising. They did everything in their power as a private entity, the DNC, to get the icon of criminality on the last presidential ballot. Thank God eternally she lost! However, the hatred and depraved indifference for this immoral call for President Trump's decapitation by a D-list hate rhetoric woman who calls her embarrassing spectacle comedy, upholds personally and on stage everything that is condemned in scripture. And the hate filled rhetoric and spread of slander , gossip, and malice against our elected President and his family , is expected of one like that. One who is dead in her sin. But it is a violation of God's grace, the rebirth from that spirit in this world that compels that type behavior, and the scriptures the Father gave us that direct us to respect and obey and honor those authorities he put in power over us. I wouldn't worry about Kathy Griffin being given grace, she's an atheist and not worthy of it. It is up to God to put her in his grace. Rather, I think the issue on display in the church is one that calls for Christians to remember their baptism and recall God's grace and therein cease spreading slander, false witness, expressing condescension, and promoting hatred and division among the Ekklesia for the express purpose of assailing President Trump, his family, and the United States of America.

A personal opinion is fine. But Federal law is something other. And with her celebrity she can incite the act by implying through the effigy model that is 1. what she wants done. 2. to be done. 3. is deserved by Trump.

Yes, calling grace be shown to a woman that stands for everything Christianity opposes, and that makes a death threat against our President . While that same woman after her fake apology vows not to stop attacking Trump nor his family including his 12 year old son. Then those same callers refuse grace to the man Griffin wants dead. And do not condemn her death threat. That's really something to read. And that's just on Christian forums. The features morph in self-identified Christians I've seen in person who spew hatred against Trump are a sight! Seriously.

Good for the Czech's. That Muslim terrorists detonate themselves in crowds this Metro police instruction is rather stupid.

Latest Britain needs a Second Amendment–Britain needs legal gun ownership ADAM GARRIE 1 hour ago Terrorism in the west can be stopped. It requires a change in foreign policy, robust police numbers and a well armed responsible citizen base. The current and possibly outgoing British Prime Minister thinks that old fashioned East German style censorship will somehow prevent terrorism. This ludicrous and counter productive proposal has been thoroughly picked apart by The Duran. Full Article Theresa May is a Communist on free speech–Jeremy Corbyn a pragmatist about terrorism London police are armed only with a baton and mace. Until or unless a special armed service group arrives at a violent scene first responder police are at a loss to stop it with lethal force themselves. During London Attack some Police Officers Ran Away June 4, 2017

This is likely why they're targeting Europe. The populace are unable to fight back with arms.

Quite honestly the level of hatred I've seen in my area boggles the mind when it is spewed by those who say they're also in the grace of God and in Christ.

Unable to simply answer. Thank you.

dbl

She doesn't know what she did was wrong. Listening to her after her transparent false act of contrition is evidence of that. God's grace surrounds Donald Trump. And I asked you do you support someone sending the message our President is dead?

My statement reflected her effigy and the message she sent with it. She implied Donald Trump was dead. She held up his (effigy) head that was bloody and severed at the neck. That's a threat against the president under federal law. Do you support someone sending the message our President is dead?

A Muslim CNN employee outraged over measures to insure the national security of America against terrorist Muslims. I'm shocked. President Trump should put the ban into effect and let all the left detractors twist with outrage that he's determined not to let America become as incendiary as Europe. No court can step over or on his order. He has the right to secure this nation and does not need permission.