He giveth more grace Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 123 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,049 Content Per Day: 0.32 Reputation: 267 Days Won: 9 Joined: 10/22/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 I like Ann Coulter, but is her message being lost in her aggressiveness. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/video/ann-coulter-gets-censored-live-tv Coulter is an attractive Mississippi lady who love hunting, I have been is parts of Mississippi that are plain back-woodsy, she must be from one of those places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~candice~ Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 5 Topic Count: 955 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 11,318 Content Per Day: 1.89 Reputation: 448 Days Won: 33 Joined: 12/16/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 As if what she SAID she called him was any better? Egads! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He giveth more grace Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 123 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,049 Content Per Day: 0.32 Reputation: 267 Days Won: 9 Joined: 10/22/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 19, 2012 As if what she SAID she called him was any better? Egads! Right, she needs to tone it a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~candice~ Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 5 Topic Count: 955 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 11,318 Content Per Day: 1.89 Reputation: 448 Days Won: 33 Joined: 12/16/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 More than a little. Some may call me a sexist, I don't care, but when a WOMAN starts acting like a shockjock, it is even more unclassy than when a man does it, and just foul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He giveth more grace Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 123 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,049 Content Per Day: 0.32 Reputation: 267 Days Won: 9 Joined: 10/22/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 19, 2012 When a pundit is that aggressive they are delegated to insignificance, they cheapen the message, the message is sullied (my favorite word ;=) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 This happened a few months back but, still, she showed no class or judgement at all. Get a clue, Coulter; it looks even worse on you than your boyfriend, Bill Maher. Never could stand this woman but she's always been, at least, able to conduct herself well in interviews and her vocabulary is certainly not limited to locker room references. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Durnan Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 121 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,782 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 49 Days Won: 1 Joined: 06/14/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 Conservative talk-show diva Ann Coulter censored? But why not UltraLibDem & socialists Bill Maher and Joy Behar? Or on many occasions socialist Barb Walters and scores of others? Glaring double standard here? I love it! Oh, I love it! Keep in mind that the vast majority of censorship is pefornmed by UltraLibDems who exclude moral & religious values from textbooks and assigned reading, and impose the opposite. Liberaldom strives to exclude virtually all conservative views & values everywhere, claiming such an approach is pluralistic & inclusion of such values consitutes imposition of morality. Even a cursory glance at the condition of public schools reveals that somebody's morality aleady has been imposed to the detriment of students whose test scores have radically declined and whose incidents of violence, venereal disease and unwanted pregnancies (hence massive doles of aborticide) have increased. It all reminds us that the proper prefix for Washington (and environs) wit could very well be nit- Thanx loads, but like Coulter, I'd much rather be (relatively) free to say my piece publicly and, as a Christian lawfully, where my views can be debated, accepted or dismantled by opponents. You have not converted a man because you have silenced him. Conversions cannot happen without dialogue. Freedom of the press, I would remind you, is of very little use to the ordinary citizen as an individual. The UltraLibDem News-Media-Elite are fair, balanced & objective. And pigs fly too! Mark it down...Bigot: Simply omeone winning an argument with a Liberal. Please give me Ann Coulter over the aforementioned ultra- liberal stalwarts by at least a thousand to one. It's time & past time that a truly progressive society covered up some of its cesspools and started planting a few flowers.....beginning perhaps in its UltraLibDem & pro-Eurocentric Obama World. So kindly proceed Ann, Joy & Bill! If I disagree politically, I'd be glad to openly debate you. Why be 'Politically Korrect' when you can be right? Methinks a remedy for offensive speech is not automatic censorship but more speech, corrective speech from the bed-rock of traditional Judeo-Christian values. Ah, that's a keeper for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 Conservative talk-show diva Ann Coulter censored? But why not UltraLibDem & socialists Bill Maher and Joy Behar? Or on many occasions socialist Barb Walters and scores of others? Glaring double standard here? I love it! Oh, I love it! Keep in mind that the vast majority of censorship is pefornmed by UltraLibDems who exclude moral & religious values from textbooks and assigned reading, and impose the opposite. Liberaldom strives to exclude virtually all conservative views & values everywhere, claiming such an approach is pluralistic & inclusion of such values consitutes imposition of morality. Even a cursory glance at the condition of public schools reveals that somebody's morality aleady has been imposed to the detriment of students whose test scores have radically declined and whose incidents of violence, venereal disease and unwanted pregnancies (hence massive doles of aborticide) have increased. It all reminds us that the proper prefix for Washington (and environs) wit could very well be nit- Thanx loads, but like Coulter, I'd much rather be (relatively) free to say my piece publicly and, as a Christian lawfully, where my views can be debated, accepted or dismantled by opponents. You have not converted a man because you have silenced him. Conversions cannot happen without dialogue. Freedom of the press, I would remind you, is of very little use to the ordinary citizen as an individual. The UltraLibDem News-Media-Elite are fair, balanced & objective. And pigs fly too! Mark it down...Bigot: Simply omeone winning an argument with a Liberal. Please give me Ann Coulter over the aforementioned ultra- liberal stalwarts by at least a thousand to one. It's time & past time that a truly progressive society covered up some of its cesspools and started planting a few flowers.....beginning perhaps in its UltraLibDem & pro-Eurocentric Obama World. So kindly proceed Ann, Joy & Bill! If I disagree politically, I'd be glad to openly debate you. Why be 'Politically Korrect' when you can be right? Methinks a remedy for offensive speech is not automatic censorship but more speech, corrective speech from the bed-rock of traditional Judeo-Christian values. Ah, that's a keeper for sure. Sorry, Arthur, but I disagree. Coulter showed lack of judgement and lack of class. Let's get this clear ONE more time; it doesn't matter what 'the other side' does. Doing exactly the same thing is NOT a moral victory. Freedom of speech is great and I defend it but there are people who simply have to be muzzled because they can't control their mouths. Remember, what's acceptable at 11:00 P.M. isn't at 11:00 A.M.; at least not here in the U.S., so it really does depend on what time one says the offensive thing whether they are censored. Btw, spouting Socialist rhetoric won't get you censored in this country either. It's that freedom of speech thing again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Durnan Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 121 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,782 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 49 Days Won: 1 Joined: 06/14/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 Hi, Morning Glory! Always great to hear. Well, okay, okay, I read you, but please publicly state that you'll also publicly rebuke the Behars, Mahers, the Axelrods, etc. too with your same holy vigor, yes? Coulter is simply responding to Liberaldom's hebitudinous, 'anything-goes' stances....and with, in our estimation, more much ringing (statistical) substance than momentum. In any Land of Liberty without the freedom to perhaps offend, freedom ceases to exist. She quickly turned the Far-Leftist "The View-Crew" into, well, bumbling idiots. Mass infantilism, anyone? Life's highest values are not - as I know you well know - animal urges, women-to-be-used-without-concern-or-consent and then casually abandoned, or the heinous destruction of aborticide, or sexually-sick characters as worthy paradigms of conduct; or perversion, bestiality as the norm, or relationships divorced from true love, commitment, morality & responsibility. Such malevolent inanity is like walking the pitcher, ah, worse still, the vestibule of hell itself. Coulter is essentially against the UltraLibDem 'Logo of Life': Live fast, Die young, Leave a good-looking corpse! Are you sure you don't know the way to the nearest Exit? She is to be congratulated for speaking the facts against remorseless amoralism seeping thru the popular culture like a contagion - with records to back her up - and impossible to be denied by the "Call-It-As-It-Isn't" View-Crew. One thing I do definitely know: Coulter doesn't read tea-leaves; she addresses undeniable goings-on, yes indeed, with ruthless candor. M.G., M.G., don't grin loopily! Have a ttremendous day all day today in beautiful West Houston(?) TX! God Bless America! God Bless Rick Perry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted March 19, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2012 Hi, Morning Glory! Always great to hear. Well, okay, okay, I read you, but please publicly state that you'll also publicly rebuke the Behars, Mahers, the Axelrods, etc. too with your same holy vigor, yes? Coulter is simply responding to Liberaldom's hebitudinous, 'anything-goes' stances....and with, in our estimation, more much ringing (statistical) substance than momentum. In any Land of Liberty without the freedom to perhaps offend, freedom ceases to exist. She quickly turned the Far-Leftist "The View-Crew" into, well, bumbling idiots. Mass infantilism, anyone? Life's highest values are not - as I know you well know - animal urges, women-to-be-used-without-concern-or-consent and then casually abandoned, or the heinous destruction of aborticide, or sexually-sick characters as worthy paradigms of conduct; or perversion, bestiality as the norm, or relationships divorced from true love, commitment, morality & responsibility. Such malevolent inanity is like walking the pitcher, ah, worse still, the vestibule of hell itself. Coulter is essentially against the UltraLibDem 'Logo of Life': Live fast, Die young, Leave a good-looking corpse! Are you sure you don't know the way to the nearest Exit? She is to be congratulated for speaking the facts against remorseless amoralism seeping thru the popular culture like a contagion - with records to back her up - and impossible to be denied by the "Call-It-As-It-Isn't" View-Crew. One thing I do definitely know: Coulter doesn't read tea-leaves; she addresses undeniable goings-on, yes indeed, with ruthless candor. M.G., M.G., don't grin loopily! Have a ttremendous day all day today in beautiful West Houston(?) TX! God Bless America! God Bless Rick Perry! Yes, Arthur, I most certainly DO condemn Maher, Behar and all those types. The reason I don't usually do so unless prompted is because I DON'T WATCH OR LISTEN TO THOSE SHOWS, ever! How would I even know what they say? The View? I've only seen snippets on the news, never the show, but it looks like dumb made-for-women tripe to me. My point is that Coulter wasn't talking about any of them; she was talking about John McCain! While I disagree with him on a lot of things, does he really deserve to be called such names? No, she did herself a disservice and trashed a decent man....for what purpose? Publicity? And don't get me started on Coulter's own history of affairs....she's no choirgirl and she needs to clean up her own act if she expects to be heard on moral issues. Btw; I'm in South Houston not West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts