Jump to content
IGNORED

Spiral Galaxies: (A Challenge to the Paradigm?)


Enoch2021

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Seeker
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,033
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   67
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  12/26/2013
  • Status:  Offline

What did I do?  Am I supposed to know how old your daughter is?  On multiple occasion you have mentioned 7th grade science book, it seems a fair assumption that your daughter could be in the 7th grade.   I know that lower grades books are not updated as often, but that is not true of college level books.  I not long ago finished graduate school and our text books had references to events that took place in the previous year.
 

 

After countless people told you on another thread this very fact, then I Posted it.....

 

(Isaiah 45:7) "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."

 

You went on and still said...... GOD didn't create Evil or Darkness.

 

 

And countless people have told you that this does not refer to moral evil, that the word is better translated as "calamity".   Multiple people told you this, including Shiloh, whom you normally trust in areas of the scripture.  I guess in this area your desire to prove me wrong overcomes even that trust. 

 

The God of the Bible is not capable of creating moral evil because only someone with the capacity for evil can create evil, the God I worship does not have the capacity for evil. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The researchers are still looking for answers. . .  I don't think they are ready to abandon the age of the universe yet. I can't find that 2004 article in New Scientist.  Where did you find it?  I could only find a reference to it in AiG.

 

Sure, just ignore me.

 

I posted earlier a comment. I found the first article, but the only thing I found with the 2004 article is a summary in AiG

 

~

 

Yeap~!

 

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.89
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

I posted earlier a comment. I found the first article, but the only thing I found with the 2004 article is a summary in AiG

 

 

Are you talking about the Dr. Francis article ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.89
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

 

:huh: =  to the whole post

 

Reality is perplexing enough

 

The next replies to me directly.... just consider them NO Comment.

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Seeker
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,033
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   67
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  12/26/2013
  • Status:  Offline

 

I posted earlier a comment. I found the first article, but the only thing I found with the 2004 article is a summary in AiG

 

 

Are you talking about the Dr. Francis article ?

 

 

I too looked for it and could only find the AIG reference.  Hopefully Enoch will be so good as to supply us with the whole thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,046
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   194
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  09/25/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/30/1960

I posted earlier a comment. I found the first article, but the only thing I found with the 2004 article is a summary in AiG

Are you talking about the Dr. Francis article ?

Yes, I'd like to get it from the horse's mouth
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.89
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

 

 

I posted earlier a comment. I found the first article, but the only thing I found with the 2004 article is a summary in AiG

Are you talking about the Dr. Francis article ?

Yes, I'd like to get it from the horse's mouth

 

 

I tried everything to pull it up...stopped every single time.  I definitely didn't get it from AIG

 

Maybe he got "Expelled"??  Sure wouldn't be the first one....check the video:  Electric Universe

 

Have you tried the Yellow Pages  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  18
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  588
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   82
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  11/22/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/12/1969

 

 

 

 

===========================================================================

 

Now this is much better Jerry.  This is a few posts without any Overt/Implied Insults.  I Like It!!!!

 

 

Just want to clarify where you stand.  Do you believe what you are proposing precludes the universe being 13+ billion years old?

 

Yes, part of it.

 

 

How old do you think the Unverse is and how did you come to that conclusion?

 

6-10,000 years Old......  From Genesis.

 

Thanks, I had assumed you were a young earth guy, but wanted to confirm.  Any cognitive dissonance using science from folks who believe the universe is 13+ billion years old to bolster your case for young earth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.89
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

 

 

 

Jerry you are officially out of the dog house.  THAT'S 4 POSTS!!!!!!!!!   :hurrah:

 

Could you rephrase this....

 

Any cognitive dissonance using science from folks who believe the universe is 13+ billion years old to bolster your case for young earth?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.89
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

Speaking of videos,  this is quite illuminating:

 

Universe-Episode1-The Cosmology Quest- The Electric Universe and Plasma Physics

 

Some Heavy Hitters in this

 

 

Watch this!!  Let's here some comments....I can't wait      :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...