Jump to content
IGNORED

Can a good christian also be a politician?


opportunitykenny

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.35
  • Reputation:   6,612
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

5 hours ago, opportunitykenny said:

So if a good christian also be a politician, HOW and WHERE?

There is a difference between "politician" (manipulator) and legislator or administrator.  We have the examples of Joseph and Daniel as men involved in the government of Gentile nations, yet maintaining their integrity. So yes, a good Christian can be involved in governance without compromising his Christianity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  105
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   63
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/23/2016
  • Status:  Offline

5 minutes ago, Ezra said:

There is a difference between "politician" (manipulator) and legislator or administrator.  We have the examples of Joseph and Daniel as men involved in the government of Gentile nations, yet maintaining their integrity. So yes, a good Christian can be involved in governance without compromising his Christianity.

From what source do you derive your definition of politician? (manipulator)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.35
  • Reputation:   6,612
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

1 minute ago, Blue Lotus said:

From what source do you derive your definition of politician? (manipulator)

General observation is more than enough. Politicians generally make all kinds of promises to get votes, but rarely deliver. Remember the promises of Obamacare?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  105
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   63
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/23/2016
  • Status:  Offline

11 minutes ago, Ezra said:

General observation is more than enough. Politicians generally make all kinds of promises to get votes, but rarely deliver. Remember the promises of Obamacare?

And yet, such a blanket indictment insults those Christians that can be in politics and working for the good. 
Case in point, Donald J. Trump. 
Did you vote for him? 

He's not a career politician but he has assumed the highest responsibility in the field of leadership politics.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.35
  • Reputation:   6,612
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Just now, Blue Lotus said:

He's not a career politician...

There's your answer. Also he will take just $1/year as his salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  105
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   63
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/23/2016
  • Status:  Offline

12 minutes ago, Ezra said:

There's your answer. Also he will take just $1/year as his salary.

When the salary is $400,000.00 per year, is that a good thing? Or unconstitutional? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.35
  • Reputation:   6,612
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

5 minutes ago, Blue Lotus said:

When the salary is $400,000.00 per year, is that a good thing? Or unconstitutional? 

Absolutely. Since he is taking $1/year that indicates that he is taking a "salary".  When he is refusing to take $400,000 (or whatever) he is telling the world that he is not there for himself but for the country.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/13/confirmed-donald-trump-says-will-take-1-salary-president/

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  105
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   63
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/23/2016
  • Status:  Offline

10 minutes ago, Ezra said:

Absolutely. Since he is taking $1/year that indicates that he is taking a "salary".  When he is refusing to take $400,000 (or whatever) he is telling the world that he is not there for himself but for the country.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/13/confirmed-donald-trump-says-will-take-1-salary-president/

Breitbart isn't typically credible. Further, it isn't , or whatever. 2001 the presidential salary increased to $400,000.00. So it is very specifically that amount. As well as a $50,000.00 expense allowance. 

U.S. Code › Title 3 › Chapter 2 › § 1023 U.S. Code § 102 - Compensation of the President

 

Is it  thing? Or is he trying to usurp the U.S. Code? Because he thinks he can? He can take the $400,000.00 and put it into a private project fund for when he leaves office. Imagine 1.6 million at the end of a first term and what that could do for lets say a veterans cause in 2021. 

The point being he should think to play by the rules if he's going to be the highest office of rule in America. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.35
  • Reputation:   6,612
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

45 minutes ago, Blue Lotus said:

The point being he should think to play by the rules if he's going to be the highest office of rule in America. 

It is exactly because Trump does NOT play by the rules that he became the President. In fact, he is going to throw out many of the "rules" that have been destroying America.  You should be grateful that he is not taking $400,000 or whatever from the public coffers to line his pockets.  Instead you are raising objections. Unbelievable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.35
  • Reputation:   6,612
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

57 minutes ago, Blue Lotus said:

Breitbart isn't typically credible.

Bretibart is more credible than any of the MSM, but if you prefer the MSM, thats your prerogative.  Just dont say that Breitbart is not credible because that would be more fake news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...