The_Patriot21 Posted March 30, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,710 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,526 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted March 30, 2017 Just now, ruck1b said: Did you actually read the story. I even helped put and posted why what waa stated and what you are saying makes no sense. Read the article...thanks. I did...and I pointed out, why its really not that big of an extra expense, because those secret service agents, get paid the same regardless of their location. In fact, many may in fact be local-already live there. Contrary to popular belief, the secret service isnt JUST based in washington DC. I read the article...just because you don't agree with my viewpoint is no reason to make it personal....debate the subject, not the person please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruck1b Posted March 30, 2017 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 24 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 352 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2015 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 Over 100k a day is not much of an extra expense eh.???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted March 31, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,710 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,526 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted March 31, 2017 1 minute ago, ruck1b said: Over 100k a day is not much of an extra expense eh.???? again though the liberals are first off, including the cost of the Secret Service agents-and unfairly, I might add, because they get paid the same regardless of where they are or what they are doing. I imagine if you subtracted their wages, it would be a significantly lower amount. And the extra beyond that isnt that great, even if you include the wages of the secret service agents, it makes no difference, its a relatively low amount compared to many, many things the government wastes money on, and protecting the first family is very, very important, and yes, their sons well being should be taken note. Had this been the obamas, no one would be saying a word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted March 31, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted March 31, 2017 11 hours ago, The_Patriot2017 said: Had this been the obamas, no one would be saying a word. Oh I think you would be saying something. And all the other anti-Obama posters would be saying something. Yep (this is not personal I am trying to be funny) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 54 minutes ago, LadyKay said: Oh I think you would be saying something. And all the other anti-Obama posters would be saying something. Yep (this is not personal I am trying to be funny) Yes and we did question some of their lavish expenses and how much it cost to fly Michelle Obama by herself from Hawaii to DC on an airliner when she stayed longer in Hawaii after Obama came back from Christmas vacation. But we did not demonize Obama about it and pretend that the Obama's were bilking us more than any other president in history. The fact is that having a president comes with a huge price tag and always has. That has never been a problem until anti-Trumpers decided to use that as a platform to smear Trump. And that is all it is. It's not a legitimate criticism; it's just a smear tactic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruck1b Posted March 31, 2017 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 24 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 352 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2015 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 11 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: But we did not demonize Obama about it AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Just now, ruck1b said: AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA .. We criticized, but we did not demonize. I guess some cannot distinguish between those two things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruck1b Posted March 31, 2017 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 24 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 352 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2015 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 Just now, shiloh357 said: We criticized, but we did not demonize. I guess some cannot distinguish between those two things. I distinguish facts from alternative facts tho...carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruck1b Posted March 31, 2017 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 24 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 352 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2015 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 In anycase who is demonizing Trump. Good try tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Just now, ruck1b said: I distinguish facts from alternative facts tho...carry on. I have not seen any evidence that supports that assertion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts