WorthyNewsBot Posted October 23, 2017 Group: Bots Followers: 3 Topic Count: 39,879 Topics Per Day: 6.45 Content Count: 44,410 Content Per Day: 7.18 Reputation: 986 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/06/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted October 23, 2017 (Worthy News) - Its most recent misstep occurred this week when its social media team tweeted this misleading headline: "Fact check: No, the Clintons were not paid millions by Russia." .@foxandfriends "Russia sent millions to Clinton Foundation" — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 19, 2017 He is not wrong, and the Newsweek article acknowledges as much. It acknowledges that former President Bill Clinton received a generous $500,000 speaking fee in 2010 from a Kremlin-linked bank with ties to Uranium One, a Canadian uranium company that had mines in the U.S. The Newsweek article also acknowledges a separate New York Times report that showed Uranium One's chairman donated approximately $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation in four separate installments as his company was being acquired by a Russian nuclear energy firm called Rosatom. [ Source (Read More...) ] View the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmbld Posted October 23, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 48 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 2,491 Content Per Day: 0.54 Reputation: 1,457 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/23/2011 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/02/1971 Share Posted October 23, 2017 Lol reality is not real! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted October 23, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.68 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted October 23, 2017 (edited) This is the world we now live in, the world of "alternative facts". Russia did give money to the Clintons, they gave it to the Clinton Foundation... It is not unlike when people said that Trump never filed bankruptcies, just his companies did. We see this sort of thing all the time now, going back to what the meaning of "is" is... Edited October 23, 2017 by Running Gator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts