Jump to content
IGNORED

The Parable of The Rich Man & Lazarus


bcbsr

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,979
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   2,112
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/23/2018
  • Status:  Offline

My pastor explained a parable was, ...Jesus used an illustration that the listeners were very familiar with, sowing seed, building a house, where the house is built, losing an object, ...the people listening to this teaching, just like us today, did not know what happens to someone after death, ...until Jesus taught about it in the actual lives of these two men..., so yes, because the poor man's name is mentioned, Lazarus, ...then it means his name is written in the Lamb's book of life, whereas the rich man's is not, ...it's an actual story.

Personally, I believe the largest and the longest on going prayer meeting ever, ...is in Hell, ...the rich man's concern for his brothers shows us that he never thought he would end up there, ...especially those that died in the Cults, ...who thought "they" had the Truth and are now face to face with the men and women who were the founders of their "particular" cult!

I'm not saying God will grant their prayers, ...but He certainly can hear them. Psa 139:8

Think about it, ...what else can they do now that they are there?

Lord bless  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  100
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  41,429
  • Content Per Day:  8.00
  • Reputation:   21,580
  • Days Won:  76
  • Joined:  03/13/2010
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/27/1957

Hell contains only the wrath of God and rightfully so as those there rejected His Son...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  23
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/15/2019
  • Status:  Offline

On 10/2/2019 at 5:43 PM, wingnut- said:

He never tells us it is a parable though.

Hello wingnut. I tried to find the equivalent Hebrew word for parable in the OT and came up with H4812, which is used mostly in Ezekiel of the Prophets concerning the people of Israel and Judah.

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H4912&t=NKJV
4912 mashal apparently from 4910 in some original sense of superiority in mental action; properly, a pithy maxim, usually of metaphorical nature; hence, a simile (as an adage, poem, discourse):--byword, like, parable, proverb.

I can look at this as Jesus actually talking:

Eze 12:22 “Son of man/adam, what is this proverb<4912> that you people have about the land of Israel, which says, ‘The days are prolonged, and every vision fails’?

Eze 20:49 Then I said, “Ah, Yahweh Elohim ! They say of me, ‘Does he not speak parables<4912>?’ ”

=========================

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G3850&t=NKJV

3850. parabole  from 3846; a similitude ("parable"), i.e. (symbolic) fictitious narrative (of common life conveying a moral), apothegm or adage:--comparison, figure, parable, proverb.
G3850 παραβολή (parabolē) occurs 50 times in 48 verses

MATTHEW 13: 13 Therefore I speak to them in parables<3850>, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. 14 And in them the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled, which says: 'Hearing you will hear and shall not understand, and seeing you will see and not perceive; 15 for the hearts of this people have grown dull. Their ears are hard of hearing, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, so that I should heal them.' "

===============================

I find the view of this commentator quite interesting, as he implies the previous parables, along withe this one, are as 1 complet parable.  Also it should be noted the audience Jesus was speaking to, the common Jews along with the corrupt Jewish Rulers listening, primarily the Pharisees. This parable is only in Luke and Lazarus is only used in Luke 16 and 2 chapters of John.

http://www.kingdombiblestudies.org/abraham/abrahams_bosom.htm

The story of the rich man and Lazarus is without doubt one of the most misunderstood of all the stories in the Bible. Is it a parable, or an actual statement of facts concerning life beyond the grave? It is strenuously denied by most evangelists that this story, as told by Christ, could be a parable. They hold that this is not a parable because it starts out in narrative form. It is argued, because it reads, “There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day,” that Christ is speaking here of an actual incident that took place. But in the parable of the prodigal son, in the fifteenth chapter of Luke, the narrative introduction is found also, for it says, “A certain man had two sons...” Yet it is generally conceded that the story of the prodigal son is a parable and all the fundamentalist preachers love to preach from its beautiful figures, thus applying it as a parable.

Quote

Usually, when the story of the rich man and Lazarus is considered, its setting is ignored. At the time the story was told Jesus had just eaten dinner with a Pharisee, at which time He not only healed a man with dropsy, but gave some pointed advice about how to give a dinner party. When He left the house, great throngs followed Him. Many of this great company were publicans and sinners who drew near to hear His teaching, and mingled with them were a great number of the scribes and Pharisees. The scribes and Pharisees complained openly and bitterly against Jesus, condemning Him because He received sinners into His company and ate with them. Against this background of biting criticism Jesus stood and gave the teachings found in chapters fifteen and sixteen of Luke. There are five stories which follow consecutively. It is well known, of course, that chapters and verses were not in the original scriptures. We are at liberty to change them when they do not synchronize with other scripture. Any arrangement of chapter and verse division that clarifies or harmonizes other scripture, is more authoritative than that division that beclouds other statements of the Bible.

At the beginning of Jesus’ discourse in chapter fifteen of Luke the statement is made that “He spoke this parable unto them, saying,” (Lk. 15:3). The Greek is very definite in making the word for parable clearly a singular noun. It is “the parable this..” This statement is followed by five separate stories, the first of which is the story of the lost sheep, and the last is the story of the rich man and Lazarus. You see, the teaching in chapter sixteen is but the continuation of the discourse in chapter fifteen, without interruption. Now, which of the five stories He gave them in this sermon was called a parable? The only one of the five which is prefaced by the claim, “And He spoke this parable unto them,” was the story about the lost sheep. Was the lost sheep the only one that could be called a parable? And yet, any preacher or believer that I know will answer that the story of the lost coin, as well as the prodigal son, were also parables. Then why was the singular used - “this parable”?

It should be clear to any thinking mind that all these stories were ONE PARABLE, like the facets of a diamond, as they turn each scintillates with new brilliance. Each was illustrating a view point of one great truth, and together they compose a whole. And this parabolic discourse of Jesus is continued into chapter sixteen of Luke, including the story of the rich man and Lazarus. The truth is that all five stories are each a fractional part of the complete parable, and when we read, “He spoke this parable unto them,” this embraces the entire collection of symbol-pictures which in their completeness constituted the parable which He spoke.

It is a careless assumption and an unfounded assertion to argue that the story of the rich man and Lazarus is not a parable![/quote[

==========================================

http://www.herealittletherealittle.net/index.cfm?page_name=Lazarus

As this passage and the parallel Scripture in Mark 4 clearly state, Yeshua spoke to the people in parables to hide the spiritual meaning of what he was saying. He only intended for his disciples to understand what the parables truly meant. It is no wonder, then, that so many have misunderstood what Yeshua was teaching with the parable of Lazarus and the rich man.

Quote

Let's start by getting some background information on the situation in which Yeshua told this parable. Luke tells us that all the tax collectors and sinners were coming to the Messiah to hear what he had to say (Luke 15:1). This made the Pharisees and scribes jealous and they complained, vehemently criticizing Yeshua for receiving sinners and eating with them (Luke 15:2). They were likely envious of his growing fame, afraid that his popularity would diminish their own authority and prestige.

So the Messiah first spoke a trio of related parables (the lost sheep, the lost coin, and the prodigal son) to those gathered around him. They were designed to show the tax collectors and sinners (as well as the Pharisees) that God was concerned for them and that He would seek out the lost and welcome them into His family when they repented and turned back to Him.

The self-righteous Pharisees and scribes, acknowledged by Yeshua as the legitimate religious teachers of the Jews (Matt. 23:1-3), should have been the ones telling these people of God's love for them. They should have been the ones teaching these sinners, exhorting them to return to God and receive His love and forgiveness. However, because of their faith in their own righteousness and their contempt for these tax collectors and sinners who didn't measure up to their standards, the Pharisees and scribes excluded them and considered them accursed (John 7:49).

Afterward, speaking primarily to his disciples but with the Pharisees (and probably the crowd) still listening in, Yeshua related the parable of the unjust steward (Luke 16:1-13). The Pharisees, who were "lovers of money" (Luke 16:14), realized that the Messiah was alluding to them with this parable and took offense. They scoffed at Yeshua. The final part of his response to the derision of the Pharisees and scribes was the parable of Lazarus and the rich man.

Edited by InChristAlways
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  100
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  41,429
  • Content Per Day:  8.00
  • Reputation:   21,580
  • Days Won:  76
  • Joined:  03/13/2010
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/27/1957

I find all this is it a parable or is it not quite contrary to reason … for if Jesus said a specific name of a person and that it was not so it is lie plain and simple and if the events in them were not all true it is lie... need I remind anyone

Heb 6:18-20

18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:

19 Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into that within the veil;

20 Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
KJV

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...