God places it on our hearts ,when we are to apologise.

[johnthebaptist]

29 minutes ago, clancy said:

Are you sure you aren’t trying to have the “ last word”...???

When your response requires a response, I'll respond. If someone treats me disrespectfully, I might respond.

[Guest clancy]

3 minutes ago, johnthebaptist said:

When your response requires a response, I'll respond. If someone treats me disrespectfully, I might respond.

I was just joking Bro.???

[johnthebaptist]

16 minutes ago, clancy said:

I was just joking Bro.???

We can have a contest to see who gets the last word.

[johnthebaptist]

3 minutes ago, Josheb said:

Got scripture for that?

Got a rule in the tou you saying that? 

If you are going to insult me on this forum, I think you should expect me to respond.

Edited April 6, 2021 by johnthebaptist

[johnthebaptist]

9 minutes ago, Josheb said:

Post has been reported. 

What I expect is for folks to stay on topic and keep the posts about the posts. 

 

For the record: I  haven't "insulted" anyone.

You misquoted me by emboldening and underlining the "you" in my quote, twice. I didn't do that. However, I won't turn you in.

[johnthebaptist]

9 minutes ago, Josheb said:

No, john, I was highlighting how the post reads. 

Don't use the word "you" if "you, the reader" isn't the intent. I did not take any offense at all from the post. Neither did I misquote anything. I highlighted portions of what was stated to raise some awareness about how the post reads. This is a text-based medium. All we have is the text. We don't have the intent or motive unless either is stated. The post was off-topic and now the posts are getting further and further away from the topic, more defensive, and adversarial, and talking about "rights" and a bunch of stuff further and further afield of the original point being made. 

I'm trying to help. 

Pay attention because several brothers and sisters are trying to help. The original point of dispute was bait, john. It didn't come with a neon sign announcing itself. I wasn't the one who posted the bait. I have no conflict with you. Is the original point of dispute that was occurring with an entirely different poster recalled? Is the original interest in the point remain? If so then what's stopping a return to the topic of discourse? 

Because I am not the obstacle . 

Go back a couple of pages to the point of original disagreement. Remake the point. Or don't. 

You quoted me, but you altered the quote. Learn from your mistakes.